You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

This site looks questionable to me. It bills itself as "A media wing and project of the Belgrade based NGO, the Center for Syncretic Studies, and serves as the central organ of New Resistance – Evropa, and New Resistance – North America." One of their logos is a "Y Head" double-headed eagle per Eyes Wide Shut and Rothschild fame. Folks should do deep vetting of all claims before sharing. I worry this is an attempt to convince folks their children will be taken by CPS in order to incite civil war to justify further draconian measures. Out of an abundance of caution, due to this logo, I am giving this the "Possible Disinfo" flair.

I also noticed several of the hyperlinks in the story don't actually support the claims being made.

Here's an archive of the mint press article linked in this article, which discusses Haiti and PIH in additional detail: https://archive.vn/o1IaH.

argosciv ago

Okay, I did some digging around...

The PIH -> CF connection is pretty sound, that part isn't disinfo.

The claim that PIH is directly involved in the crimes mentioned is not yet verified, perhaps there's info connecting them, I've not yet found it but I haven't followed all leads there so I'm not saying the connection doesn't exist.

The concern about the vaccine/rfid system is... well... to put it politely, at this time the evidence suggests that it's a misconception verging on sensationalism. They Corey's Digs article, aside from being impressively lengthy, does provide material which explains the process and how said process not only doesn't involve injecting a chip but also doesn't record any data about the patient without explicit opt in.

As for the "taking your children" angle, sensationalism/speculation at this point in time.

I'd go so far as to say maybe "accuracy in question" is a better flair here.

 

All of that said, fucking lol at the obvious sockpuppets trying to revive their usual accusations over in QRV.

4696294512835103 ago

Thanks for looking into this and providing your opinion on the flair. According to the title of the thread, which is the exact wording of the article, this should not be flaired with anything. The other info about taking children from homes, we know that this was done in Haiti and we know that the same woman is now working with the Amber Alert system under a different name. You just can't make this stuff up. We, parents especially, should be concerned about anything the Clintons are involved with, and even more so when their tentacles have the chance to reach into our homes and have an iota of opportunity to fracture the family unit. I don't doubt that contact tracers will remove ALL children from homes, but say a couple tests negative for COVID, but little Johnny is crying about being hungry and the contact tracers knock on the door just as Mom is getting ready to start cooking dinner, but hasn't had the opportunity to start getting the pot boiling on the stove yet. Are the contact tracers going to contact authorities, so that CPS shows up the next day? Remember this video from a former CPS worker and his warning to parents about how 5 dirty dishes in the sink is justification for removing a child from their home. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbMmWryH0vE

I say let this information be on the board without a flair and let people make up their own minds about the possible results that can stem from contact tracers and CPS. If I were a parent, I'd be figuring out a plan now just in case this information is accurate. After all, there's nothing wrong with being prepared for what could happen.

Forewarned is forearmed. This saying is defined as "prior knowledge of possible dangers or problems gives one a tactical advantage." The keyword here is "possible."

argosciv ago

Oh I didn't do it for your sake or in opposition to @Vindicator.

Your little campaign to sow division and overthrow the subverse ownership is not something I support and moreover it really stands out now that I remember the time you really caught my attention. You've been making/supporting accusations of gatekeeping for months and here in this submission you call subversive users who accuse users/mods of murder, "friend".

So no, I don't care for your speculation/sensationalism and heart-string pulling. I don't support you or your submission at all. I don't care for your "suspicions" about the ownership of this sub, given that you yourself are infinitely more suspicious (you even admit that this account you're using is an alt). I have my own line of inquiry which just so happens to have a bit of crossover with the company you raised here.

4696294512835103 ago

My "campaign" is actually a defense to what is an unjustified flair, which you agreed and suggested a different flair should be used. You even stated that there is a connection between PIH and the Clintons, but now you're saying you don't support this thread? Make up your mind, brother. Is this important information or not? I've barely posted to this forum since I decided to create a new handle because I attracted the hatred of SBBH. I'm sure you remember the pizzagate mods and janitors who were also members of SBBH, no? The overlap of Pizzagate mods and SBBH was disturbing to me, so I've came to distrust the authority here. Seeing that most were gone, I thought things would be different here, but I see this isn't the case.

argosciv ago

unjustified flair, which you agreed

I didn't use the word unjustified. "Accuracy in question" just suits better in my opinion.

You even stated that there is a connection between PIH and the Clintons, but now you're saying you don't support this thread?

That doesn't mean I support you or your submission or what you're trying to do and have been doing for months.

Make up your mind, brother.

I'm not your brother and your fraudulent magnanimity is detestable.

I've barely posted to this forum since I decided to create a new handle because I attracted the hatred of SBBH.

Lol. Who're you trying to fool, exactly?

I'm sure you remember the pizzagate mods and janitors who were also members of SBBH, no? The overlap of Pizzagate mods and SBBH was disturbing to me, so I've came to distrust the authority here.

You're really making it way too easy to identify you based on your talking points, let alone your behavior.

Seeing that most were gone, I thought things would be different here, but I see this isn't the case.

Lol.

Just fuckin' lol. B-grade attempt.

4696294512835103 ago

You can laugh at my honesty all you want. I love the way you sidestepped the SBBH overlap.

argosciv ago

Sidestepped? No. I know where it comes from and that you would deliberately misconstrue that situation says all that need be said about you.

Shoo, fly.

4696294512835103 ago

By the way, your downvotes to my replies make it obvious exactly who you are and what you represent.

Downvoting a member into oblivion is how SBBH rolls to silence someone and infringe on their free speech on the Voat platform. Simply stated: You glow, bitch.

4696294512835103 ago

I stated a fact. SBBH members were mods and janitors here. There's nothing to misconstrue. The cancer that is SBBH was here acting as an authority. While it doesn't appear that they are still here in that capacity, it's obvious their spirit remains.

Vindicator ago

I call for caution when an unknown user with a five month old, random number string account posts a scaremongering piece citing a Fort Russ article with deceptively used links and a logo featured in Hollywood's most notorious pizzagate movie and I'm the "cancer"?

That is retard-level shitstirring.

4696294512835103 ago

And I question any mod who focuses on the messenger rather than the information, especially when TWO sources have been provided.

If you are a member of SBBH, yes, you are cancer.

Vindicator ago

The one acting like SBBH, sniping from behind a sockpuppet, is you. I've never been a member of SBBH, and only commented there when they were spreading lies about Voat.

The fact you don't want the source of this information examined and have gotten super butthurt over a deserved Possible Disinfo warning makes it quite clear that was exactly the right way to handle this.

4696294512835103 ago

For the last time, I'm not the one who's concerned about the source. You are. You're so obsessed with who is bringing this information forward that you can't see the forest for the trees.

Vindicator ago

Every serious researcher on this board is concerned about sources, because we have a long history of dodgy accounts posting deceptive BS here to waste our time and discredit the mountain of real material we've accumulated on the corruption of the elite pedos. Here you are, mixing trash with stuff on PIH and Dahl, while attacking me. Almost like you work for them.

4696294512835103 ago

Everyone here is free to vet any source they want. After you flaired the thread, I maturely disagreed and posted a second source to quell your suspicions about the first source, but you were already on a determined rampage against me and my thread. While I and others have been digging on the info presented, you and others continue to chip away and resort to childish name calling. Keep at it though. You're only embarrassing yourself. The downvotes I'm getting are petty attempts at best. They are the equivalent at poking me in the eye simply because you have decided I'm not wanted here.