This is related to Pizzagate because her case is undoubtedly linked to a global child-trafficking industry. Needless to say, Madeleine McCann is the single-most famous mission persons case worldwide. Any substantial information relating to what happened to her in 2007 and what the current situation is, will therefore be relevant to the Pizzagate movement.
[Paragraph removed]
Unfortunately, I cannot provide for any source-able information since this matter is evidently highly suppressed by the authorities, specifically being on the part the British Government. If I could, I would. Pretty much any and all information about Maddie is the same old regurgitated nonsense that we've heard verbatim for 13 years. I for one say no more; it's time for disclosure and, therefore, action.
What I will answer to here is based upon my own personal experience with Madeleine herself. That is to say, I am in direct contact with her at this very moment. She's alive and she's listening. As such, I invite this here community to ask me any questions about this matter and I will diligently do my very best to answer them as factually and honestly as I possibly can.
Go ahead, Eagles.
I'm dumping this now, it is a legitimate email to the British police...
http://misc.spacefrontiers.co.uk/Maddie.txt
Okay, I'm putting this here as well since it's been buried. I would appreciate if people would read this before forming an opinion.
I accept the credibility aspect of this because it's virtually impossible for me to substantiate it without medical proof of a brain scan or an indisputable recording of such a thing occurring. Both of which I am confident can be produced, but do not currently exist.
I also respect the desires of the administration of this domain and the autonomous actions of those it employs. Thus, without regard as to my personal feelings on matters of moderation, rules are rules and I for one will do my utmost to align with them.
I'm done discussing the validity of an active pheromone and the manner in which it works. That's all matter of opinion and, admittedly, subjective.
My objections are not about the decision-making of the staff or people's personal opinions. I am rather greatly concerned about being accused of and thus contest that I am acting out of malice. I have said it before and I will say it again; I never have and never will attack an outlet or individual in respect of legitimate research and discussion relating to the welfare of the victims of trafficking. That would be an outrage and I am absolutely not the kind of guy to do such a thing.
I also contest that what I have experienced is on the part of being mentally unwell. I am genuinely experiencing these smells, I really am. This is unheard of, I expect that even those within psychiatry would find no prior example of this to work from.
It is also not research, it is entirely an honest account of my experiences during the past six months.
I have presented this out of a moral sense of necessity. I have submitted it here because this particular sub-verse is renowned for investigative research and discussion into what is, in my opinion, a blatant global trafficking industry (which I am even more convinced of now). I am an advocate of this movement; everybody involved in exposing these crimes has my utmost respect and thus I will never, ever do a single thing to attack them. I am not like that.
Exhibit whatsoever opinions you will regarding the credibility of my testimony. But please, do not attack my person by asserting it matter of fact that I am attempting to derail legitimate and lawful civil action as is being effected on this sub-verse. Please do not insult me by palming this all off as a lack of capacity because I have openly acknowledged that I am affected by a very common condition.
That is what I find unfair, not people's opinions or one's experience in handling the content of the domain.
In a nutshell, please don't proffer arbitrary and unqualified clinical advice or assertions.
view the rest of the comments β
NinaSparrow ago
Idk how much u know or if u can say, but..
Is she, at the very least, being somewhat decently taken care of, in terms of food & shelter?
Or is it more like an utterly horrific "children kept in cages", satanic rituals, etc. type situation? π₯Ίπ
Hmm.. I wonder if she means "G", as is George Soros? π€
Vigilia_Procuratio ago
Back in November when I first reached her, the first thing she sent me was an SOS and she was regularly sending it over the course of that day. Once she realised I was trying to help her, she stopped sending it. From the second day, she has not sent once since. She has not since suggested that she is in trouble, but I know that she is right now but she will not acknowledge it.
I don't think she eats a great deal, but I'm guessing that's down to her own choice. She does eat, yes, I regularly smell Middle Eastern food. But she hardly sleeps.
I am entirely confident that she is not being hurt, but she is being exploited no less.
No, it's not "G" for "George". I've asked her quite a few times why she would do what that network is telling her to do, and she would simply respond with "G". It's pretty obvious what that means.
NinaSparrow ago
Thank you.
You must be in close proximity to her, at least to smell middle eastern food? Right? Or did I read that wrong?
Stockholm syndrome is no joke, my God. It is amazing to know she is alive & at the same time horrifying to know she has likely been living in hell for 13yrs.
Thank you for your answer & for being here.
Vigilia_Procuratio ago
You read it wrong. It works instantly and remotely, anywhere in the world. No idea how it travels so fast, but we're talking about real-time communication no matter the distance.
We can smell what we're eating, smelling or any hormones we're giving off. That's how I know that she smokes cigarettes and takes drugs. Suffice to say, I can smell her having sex.
Yes, she's conditioned and seemingly doing what she's been used to doing since she was very young.
ORDOTEMPLIINTERNETIS ago
Am I understanding correctly, you can smell her due to proximity, yet you think they monitor her (thoughts?) from afar?
Neural link and brainwave monitoring is quite possible technologically, and reoccurs in the realms of MK Ultra and greater agenda to much not to be a handlers M.O. Does she believe this is the case?
Vigilia_Procuratio ago
Thoughts, no. At least I've got no reason to suspect that. It's about hormones.
They're not monitoring her, they're with her. She has company.
ORDOTEMPLIINTERNETIS ago
Copy that. I am glad you have 'higher contact' with her. You may be her lifeline.
Vigilia_Procuratio ago
Indeed. But I can't do this alone, which is precisely why I'm doing this. It's pretty clear that the authorities have no intention of helping her, as was the case 13 years ago and so it continues. The only option is thus forcible public disclosure.