What does the hankerchief email prove exactly? Nonsense like this is just like an excuse to believe in pizzagate, it doesn't make sense nor does it prove the allegations behind pizzagate in any way.
What is the probability it means something similar as the other weird emails about children for entertainment or pizza in "poor health" that is not expected to survive?
Yes, you take the same handful of e-mails cherrypicked out of thense of thousands especially for this, that don't even use the same supposed codewords,
you insert and modify words and invent new straw man version of quotes so that it can help you take them out of context.
Pizza in poor health and not expected to survive
What is this? This does not exist.
Please give me this wikileaks e-mail.
You can fact check it:
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/
For your entertainment, kida 6, 7 and 11 will definitely be in that pool
"We plan to heat the pool, so a swim is a possibility. Bonnie will be
Uber Service to transport Ruby, Emerson, and Maeve Luzzatto (11, 9, and
almost 7) so you’ll have some further entertainment, and they will be in
that pool for sure. "
You are cherry picking a quote from an e-mail where in the context of inviting people at a visit to a farm, a woman "Tamera Luzzatto" mentioned her grandchildren or somehow related "Ruby, Emerson, and Maeve Luzzatto"
going the opposite of common sense and taking it out of the context of how boring parents talk about their kids, and interpreting in a deranged way where that woman is offering those children for a gang bang.
There is nothing pedophilic in that e-mail and the only eason to interpret it in such a sinister way is just so that you can make pizzagate work.
Yeah I think that instead of that woman using some grandma talk that sounded weird which is exactly why that e-mail was cherry picked, it's much more probable that women offered her grandchildren for sex and the children's mother and father were totally ok with it.
Come on dude...if you're reading that e-mail trough the suspicion of pizzagate looking to find anything that can be interpreted as pedophilic, you're obviously gonna interpret it that way. But looking at it unbiased, you have no reason to do that.
The handkerchief e-mail example is more baffling. Are you suppose to imply that instead of simply something like this:
i.imgur.com/PaoJ8nY.jpg
Podesta left some handkerchief stained by semen after abusing children and some realtor offered to mail it back to him, to which he replied by: "It's mine, but not worth worrying about"?
All these examples are the product of pizzagaters cherry picking and looking at things trough the biased pizzagate lenses, and interpreting everything in a way that fits that narrative, no matter how absurd those interpretations are.
Wikileaks published over 20,000 pages of emails. If the Podesta e-mails contained code words that an elite child sex ring used to communicate, you would expect to find dozens of examples of the same code words and establish a pattern.
Yet you pizzagaters always refer back to the same handful of cherry picked e-mails that don't even use the same supposed code words. One talking about a handkerchief, one about the game of dominoes, one about hot dogs and so on.
You could go through ALL of my tens of thousands of emails and find nothing to "cherry pick", to use your words.
Unless you don't use your e-mail to comunicate with people, I highly doubt that. Those people used their e-mail to comunicate to one another. If I went trough your last 10,000 messages, I'm sure I'd be able to cherry pick lots of quotes that I could then take out of context.
Or talk of dominoes on pizza? or dominoes on pasta?
Or pizza related napkins with maps on them?
Those 2 e-mail examples do not talk about dominoes on pizza or pasta, nor about pizza related napkins with maps on them. You're inventing shit again so that it is easier for you to take it out of context.
And are based on the same taking cherry picked shit out of context strategy.
Did you even read my response to the handkerchief e-mail?
The handkerchief e-mail example is more baffling. Are you suppose to imply that instead of simply something like this:
i.imgur.com/PaoJ8nY.jpg
Podesta left some handkerchief stained by semen after abusing children and some realtor offered to mail it back to him, to which he replied by: "It's mine, but not worth worrying about"?
There's nothing stopping you from interpreting those few cherry picked e-mails in the most absurd possible way you'd like. The problem is that this is pure speculation that you have no way of proving, and it's basically useles.
Also, Wikileaks published over 20,000 pages of emails. If the Podesta e-mails contained code words that an elite child sex ring used to communicate, you would expect to find dozens of examples of the same code words and establish a pattern.
Yet you pizzagaters always refer back to the same handful of cherry picked e-mails that don't even use the same supposed code words. One talking about a handkerchief, one about the game of dominoes, one about hot dogs and so on.
I quoted the exact email wording and YOU ADMITTED it sounded like they were selling sex from their childten.
Are you even reading my replies? I said that:
Or talk of dominoes on pizza? or dominoes on pasta?
Or pizza related napkins with maps on them?
Those 2 e-mail examples do not talk about dominoes on pizza or pasta, nor about pizza related napkins with maps on them. You're inventing shit again so that it is easier for you to take it out of context.
I wasn't referring to the Tamera Luzzato e-mail there, nor have I admitted that they sound like they were selling sex from their children, I specifically said that only by looking at it expecting to find something pedophilic, would you interpret it that way.
So replying to this saying that you quoted the exact Tamera Luzzato e-mail doesn't make sense.
There is nothing "out of context" about that questionable email.
No there isn't. The only thing out of context is the deranged and illogical imagination of pizzagaters.
Also, the reason why you are only quoting the Tamera Luzzato e-mail, and constantly use it as a reply to claims talking about the other e-mails, is probably because those other few cherry picked e-mail examples are even more obviously taken out of context and make even less sense.
No, there is nothing to "cherry pick" from my emails
If I went trought the last 10,000 messages from your corespondence I'm sure I'd be able to find tons of quotes to cherry pick and take out of context.
Also, AGAIN:
Wikileaks published over 20,000 pages of emails. If the Podesta e-mails contained code words that an elite child sex ring used to communicate, you would expect to find dozens of examples of the same code words and establish a pattern.
Yet you pizzagaters always refer back to the same handful of cherry picked e-mails that don't even use the same supposed code words. One talking about a handkerchief, one about the game of dominoes, one about hot dogs and so on.
The cherry picked e-mail argument, in order for it to work was accompanied by lies about "FBI discovered pedophile code words" being found there, where pasta = little boy, map = semen etc.
Dance all you like
LOL Distort facts and take "cherry picked" quotes out of context and interpret them in bizzare irational ways all you like, that won't get you anywhere. That's pure speculation that you have no way of proving and it's basically useless anywhere outside your conspiracy theory circle.
I encourage you to take your deranged interpretations of those few cherry picked e-mails to law authorities, see how that goes for you.
I am not going to let you dance to the other pedo emails as a way to avoid the first pedo email.
LOL As if I didn't addressed it and debunked it multiple times :))
Your fake news disinfo tricks will not work on me.
You mean reason and facts won't work on you.
And YES YOU DID ADMIT IT SOUNDED LIKE THEY WERE SELLING SEX. Just a few replies ago above in this thread...your words quoted below....
"it's much more probable that she was offering her grandchildren for sex and the children's mother and father were totally ok with it."
LOL now your doing the exact same thing to me. Cherry picking a quote and taking it completely out of context =)) Jesus you pizzagaters are thick.
"Yeah I think that instead of that woman using some grandma talk that sounded weird which is exactly why that e-mail was cherry picked, it's much more probable that she was offering her grandchildren for sex and the children's mother and father were totally ok with it."
This is an ironic statement implying that obviously the second scenario is way more improbable.
Yes I absolutely did, as seen here where I showed that "pizza in poor health and not expected to survive" doesn't exist and pointed out that there isn't anything pedophilic in the Tamerra Luzzatto e-mail, and you are simply speculating a deranged scenario which you have no way of proving.
view the rest of the comments →
Shadowlight ago
LOL!
How does a guy shooting a hard drive in a pizza place prove that Podesta is innocent from those pedo emails of his?
PGIsRetarrdeddAF ago
Another pizzagate invention.
i.imgur.com/IiECyY2.jpg
The bullet hit way above from where the hard drive is situated.
Take a fact:
Spin the story to:
Be gullible and don't fact check.
Also
Is a straw man.
Shadowlight ago
I read the emails myself fuckfacs.
Pizza related napkin with a map on it?
Pizza in poor health and not expected to survive?
Dominos on Pasta or Pizza?
For your entertainment, kida 6, 7 and 11 will definitely be in that pool?
Yeah, go fuck yourself pedoprotector.
PGIsRetarrdeddAF ago
What does the hankerchief email prove exactly? Nonsense like this is just like an excuse to believe in pizzagate, it doesn't make sense nor does it prove the allegations behind pizzagate in any way.
Shadowlight ago
What is the probability it means something similar as the other weird emails about children for entertainment or pizza in "poor health" that is not expected to survive?
PGIssReetarrddedAF ago
Yes, you take the same handful of e-mails cherrypicked out of thense of thousands especially for this, that don't even use the same supposed codewords,
you insert and modify words and invent new straw man version of quotes so that it can help you take them out of context.
What is this? This does not exist.
Please give me this wikileaks e-mail.
You can fact check it:
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/
This quote does not exist either.
Shadowlight ago
Here, I will give the same reply I did to your other retarded email....THE EMAILS EXIST, AS SHOWN BELOW.
Are you actually arguing over EXACT phrases???
Desperation much?
Here is an exact quote.
"We plan to heat the pool, so a swim is a possibility. Bonnie will be
Uber Service to transport Ruby, Emerson, and Maeve Luzzatto (11, 9, and
almost 7) so you’ll have some further entertainment, and they will be in
that pool for sure. "
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/46736
PGIssReetarrddedAF ago
Excuse me, this does not exist:
wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/?q=Pizza+in+poor+health&mfrom=&mto=&title=¬itle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=¬o=&count=50&sort=0#searchresult
You are cherry picking a quote from an e-mail where in the context of inviting people at a visit to a farm, a woman "Tamera Luzzatto" mentioned her grandchildren or somehow related "Ruby, Emerson, and Maeve Luzzatto"
going the opposite of common sense and taking it out of the context of how boring parents talk about their kids, and interpreting in a deranged way where that woman is offering those children for a gang bang.
There is nothing pedophilic in that e-mail and the only eason to interpret it in such a sinister way is just so that you can make pizzagate work.
Shadowlight ago
Nothing pedophillic but it HAD TO BE SAID, the ages of those children and it HAD TO BE SAID that they would definitely be in that pool????
Hmmmmmm
PGIssReetarrddedAF ago
Yeah I think that instead of that woman using some grandma talk that sounded weird which is exactly why that e-mail was cherry picked, it's much more probable that women offered her grandchildren for sex and the children's mother and father were totally ok with it.
Come on dude...if you're reading that e-mail trough the suspicion of pizzagate looking to find anything that can be interpreted as pedophilic, you're obviously gonna interpret it that way. But looking at it unbiased, you have no reason to do that.
The handkerchief e-mail example is more baffling. Are you suppose to imply that instead of simply something like this:
i.imgur.com/PaoJ8nY.jpg
Podesta left some handkerchief stained by semen after abusing children and some realtor offered to mail it back to him, to which he replied by: "It's mine, but not worth worrying about"?
All these examples are the product of pizzagaters cherry picking and looking at things trough the biased pizzagate lenses, and interpreting everything in a way that fits that narrative, no matter how absurd those interpretations are.
Wikileaks published over 20,000 pages of emails. If the Podesta e-mails contained code words that an elite child sex ring used to communicate, you would expect to find dozens of examples of the same code words and establish a pattern.
Yet you pizzagaters always refer back to the same handful of cherry picked e-mails that don't even use the same supposed code words. One talking about a handkerchief, one about the game of dominoes, one about hot dogs and so on.
Shadowlight ago
And why would they be emailing podesta offering their children for sex?
You could go through ALL of my tens of thousands of emails and find nothing to "cherry pick", to use your words.
So do you have emails that offer up children like that?
Or talk of dominoes on pizza? or dominoes on pasta?
Or pizza related napkins with maps on them?
PGIssReetarrddedAF ago
Unless you don't use your e-mail to comunicate with people, I highly doubt that. Those people used their e-mail to comunicate to one another. If I went trough your last 10,000 messages, I'm sure I'd be able to cherry pick lots of quotes that I could then take out of context.
Those 2 e-mail examples do not talk about dominoes on pizza or pasta, nor about pizza related napkins with maps on them. You're inventing shit again so that it is easier for you to take it out of context.
And are based on the same taking cherry picked shit out of context strategy.
Did you even read my response to the handkerchief e-mail?
The handkerchief e-mail example is more baffling. Are you suppose to imply that instead of simply something like this:
i.imgur.com/PaoJ8nY.jpg
Podesta left some handkerchief stained by semen after abusing children and some realtor offered to mail it back to him, to which he replied by: "It's mine, but not worth worrying about"?
There's nothing stopping you from interpreting those few cherry picked e-mails in the most absurd possible way you'd like. The problem is that this is pure speculation that you have no way of proving, and it's basically useles.
Also, Wikileaks published over 20,000 pages of emails. If the Podesta e-mails contained code words that an elite child sex ring used to communicate, you would expect to find dozens of examples of the same code words and establish a pattern.
Yet you pizzagaters always refer back to the same handful of cherry picked e-mails that don't even use the same supposed code words. One talking about a handkerchief, one about the game of dominoes, one about hot dogs and so on.
Shadowlight ago
I quoted the exact email wording and YOU ADMITTED it sounded like they were selling sex from their childten.
There is nothing "out of context" about that questionable email.
No, there is nothing to "cherry pick" from my emails beacuse normal people do mot have weird ass emails like that.
Dance all you like, the reason those emails caught attention is BECAUSE THEY ARE SO HIGHLY UNUSUAL.
PGIssReetarrddedAF ago
Are you even reading my replies? I said that:
Those 2 e-mail examples do not talk about dominoes on pizza or pasta, nor about pizza related napkins with maps on them. You're inventing shit again so that it is easier for you to take it out of context.
I wasn't referring to the Tamera Luzzato e-mail there, nor have I admitted that they sound like they were selling sex from their children, I specifically said that only by looking at it expecting to find something pedophilic, would you interpret it that way.
So replying to this saying that you quoted the exact Tamera Luzzato e-mail doesn't make sense.
No there isn't. The only thing out of context is the deranged and illogical imagination of pizzagaters.
Also, the reason why you are only quoting the Tamera Luzzato e-mail, and constantly use it as a reply to claims talking about the other e-mails, is probably because those other few cherry picked e-mail examples are even more obviously taken out of context and make even less sense.
If I went trought the last 10,000 messages from your corespondence I'm sure I'd be able to find tons of quotes to cherry pick and take out of context.
Also, AGAIN:
Wikileaks published over 20,000 pages of emails. If the Podesta e-mails contained code words that an elite child sex ring used to communicate, you would expect to find dozens of examples of the same code words and establish a pattern.
Yet you pizzagaters always refer back to the same handful of cherry picked e-mails that don't even use the same supposed code words. One talking about a handkerchief, one about the game of dominoes, one about hot dogs and so on.
The cherry picked e-mail argument, in order for it to work was accompanied by lies about "FBI discovered pedophile code words" being found there, where pasta = little boy, map = semen etc.
LOL Distort facts and take "cherry picked" quotes out of context and interpret them in bizzare irational ways all you like, that won't get you anywhere. That's pure speculation that you have no way of proving and it's basically useless anywhere outside your conspiracy theory circle.
I encourage you to take your deranged interpretations of those few cherry picked e-mails to law authorities, see how that goes for you.
Shadowlight ago
I am not going to let you dance to the other pedo emails as a way to avoid the first pedo email.
Your fake news disinfo tricks will not work on me.
It is absolutely not normal to bring kids for "entertainment" and to explicitly list their individual ages.
That is not a normal email. Not at all. Nothing "cherry picked" about it.
PGIssReetarrddedAF ago
LOL As if I didn't addressed it and debunked it multiple times :))
You mean reason and facts won't work on you.
LOL now your doing the exact same thing to me. Cherry picking a quote and taking it completely out of context =)) Jesus you pizzagaters are thick.
"Yeah I think that instead of that woman using some grandma talk that sounded weird which is exactly why that e-mail was cherry picked, it's much more probable that she was offering her grandchildren for sex and the children's mother and father were totally ok with it."
This is an ironic statement implying that obviously the second scenario is way more improbable.
Shadowlight ago
You have not debunked anything.
You just keep screaming and crying "cherry picked".
The guy has weird as fuck emails including people pimping children to him.
PGIssReetarrddedAF ago
Yes I absolutely did, as seen here where I showed that "pizza in poor health and not expected to survive" doesn't exist and pointed out that there isn't anything pedophilic in the Tamerra Luzzatto e-mail, and you are simply speculating a deranged scenario which you have no way of proving.
voat.co/v/pizzagate/3809233/23738285
Or in all my other comments.
You ignoring it does not change that.
Shadowlight ago
And I am once again going to help you stay focused on one email before we go to the others.
Someone was obviously pimping children to Podesta.
It is NOT NORMAL to have emails like that, AT ALL.
There is no "cherry picking". No normal person would have emails like that.
It is obvious she was pimping children to Podesta. You even admitted it as I quoted above.