Hi guys!
So my husband showed me these videos this morning that blew my mind, as they cover PG info re: JA/Comet & his insta page & the horrific comments by many (a few I do not recall seeing at all) I couldnt find it on YT, so hope these insta links are ok?
BUT, then it goes into a whole new "spin off" of PG, so to speak, & shows one of the SAME commenters from the JA/Comet/Insta directly involved in the new stuff.
I am super busy this morning or I'd go into more detail. I'll be back to go thru them again & see what ya'll think.
Looks like it could be pretty big. He said that Owen Shroyer posted these videos and they were immediately taken down.
I pray u all are doing well & staying safe out there.
Blessings & Love,
N.S. 🐦
Video #1:
https://www.instagram.com/tv/B_FyJfPgUyp/?igshid=p4izu0mvwy4x
Video #2:
https://www.instagram.com/tv/B_F9q2kgT6-/?igshid=9m0m6csgxjwd
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
These are pretty well done. Part II contains an interesting rabbit hole that leads from a Vietnamese No Smoking sign on the wall behind Obama and Anthony Bourdain to a bunch of hidden web pages featuring kids in their underwear on the site of a French lingerie company and an American kids' clothier named Crazy Pants. Those claims need to be replicated.
What bothered me was his warning at the beginning of Part I and later in the video, not to Google any terms featured in it like BH Kids because doing so was "illegal". That's what CNN said about researchers accessing Podesta's emails on Wikileaks. Total BS.
Furthermore, Part I contains factual errors which will de-legitimize anyone sharing this video:
This video needs to be fully vetted. I'm giving it the "Unverified" flair for now.
Yuke ago
The JA/Antinous thing is important in all of this because he chose to use this as his profile pic, which in itself is very suggestive, but he also chose ANOTHER Antinous pic as his profile pic on another occasion. That makes it very much beyond coincidental and alludes to him being a figure of admiration for him.
Only guessing here but I imagine many see themselves in the Hadrian/Antinous dynamic, starting out as Antinous and as they age they themselves become the Hadrian figure, and so on.
As for the Biljana Djurdjevic art, I don't know the individual names off the top of my head, but there are images inside of his house that show them there, so he does own at least one.
Vindicator ago
Yeah, Podesta had a Djurdjevic in his Kalorama livingroom. Yesterday, I tried to confirm whether any of the really notable ones -- the boy that looks like Anderson Cooper, the girls kneeling in the tiled room/pool in their underpants with their hands behind their backs, the "dentists" series -- belonged to him as shown in the video but I could not find out who owns them.
Tony definitely does not own a Kim Noble painting. She was notable because she depicted a scene with a man raping a small child on a napkin, which appears to correlate with John Podesta's "handkerchief with a pizza related map" email. Confusing the two is understandable, but if we want to be taken seriously by the skeptical, we need to be accurate. It's really too bad that the video has these mistakes, because otherwise it would be a powerful thing to share. :-(
eucalyptus_spearmint ago
Thank you, it's what I've been saying all along and been downvoted for my troubles. Accuracy is key! Proof is essential. Thanks for fighting the good fight, Vindicator.
Vindicator ago
Thanks, Euc. It's really our whole point of being here. We're the one place that really vets stuff.
It's been crazy seeing all the old disinfo and debunked material being recycled since the Plandemic broke out.