Hi guys!
So my husband showed me these videos this morning that blew my mind, as they cover PG info re: JA/Comet & his insta page & the horrific comments by many (a few I do not recall seeing at all) I couldnt find it on YT, so hope these insta links are ok?
BUT, then it goes into a whole new "spin off" of PG, so to speak, & shows one of the SAME commenters from the JA/Comet/Insta directly involved in the new stuff.
I am super busy this morning or I'd go into more detail. I'll be back to go thru them again & see what ya'll think.
Looks like it could be pretty big. He said that Owen Shroyer posted these videos and they were immediately taken down.
I pray u all are doing well & staying safe out there.
Blessings & Love,
N.S. 🐦
Video #1:
https://www.instagram.com/tv/B_FyJfPgUyp/?igshid=p4izu0mvwy4x
Video #2:
https://www.instagram.com/tv/B_F9q2kgT6-/?igshid=9m0m6csgxjwd
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
These are pretty well done. Part II contains an interesting rabbit hole that leads from a Vietnamese No Smoking sign on the wall behind Obama and Anthony Bourdain to a bunch of hidden web pages featuring kids in their underwear on the site of a French lingerie company and an American kids' clothier named Crazy Pants. Those claims need to be replicated.
What bothered me was his warning at the beginning of Part I and later in the video, not to Google any terms featured in it like BH Kids because doing so was "illegal". That's what CNN said about researchers accessing Podesta's emails on Wikileaks. Total BS.
Furthermore, Part I contains factual errors which will de-legitimize anyone sharing this video:
This video needs to be fully vetted. I'm giving it the "Unverified" flair for now.
NinaSparrow ago
Hey @vindicator - u mentioned that some of the claims need to be replicated.. did u want me to somehow create links to those claims?
Or do u think the videos are a be distraction w intentional errors?
Thank u kindly!
Vindicator ago
I think it would be really good to try to replicate the searches he did (and tells us not to try because muh illegal!). If they aren't reproducible, then we should flair this debunked or disinfo or something. I'd say that, with the errors, would be pretty good evidence this is an attempt to play pizzagate researchers.
NinaSparrow ago
Agreed!!! That whole "illegal" bit was a way retarded attempt & super obvious.