You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

@ababcb, do we have any connection to elite abuse of kids per Rule 1? I'll give you the 24 Hour Grace flair, so you can edit.

BirdsEyeView ago

@ababcb, do we have any connection to elite abuse of kids per Rule 1? I'll give you the 24 Hour Grace flair, so you can edit.

Racine is run by the VERY ELITE Johnson family. That isn't good enough?

Vindicator ago

You are welcome to submit a post about that, or about how the guy named here connects to those folks. No one is doing that, though.

Here's a better question: why is your user name almost exactly the same one Alefantis used to troll v/pizzagate when he didn't like the attention we were giving his sick establishments?

argosciv ago

Here's a better question: why is your user name almost exactly the same one Alefantis used to troll v/pizzagate when he didn't like the attention we were giving his sick establishments?

Here's another one to follow up on that: Why would an account named similarly to Alefantis' sock join the chorus of "Everyone! Look only at Racine!"?

BirdsEyeView ago

The Johnson family practically owns Racine. They are an illumaniti family, connected to the cabal. You wrote reams of shit about Racine yourself. Whats your beef with a thread about Racine?

argosciv ago

You wrote reams of shit about Racine

Nice try, shit alt. Those familiar with my series, instead of spouting talking points like you, know that I went down my own lines of inquiry and didn't get sucked so far in to your garbage narrative.

BirdsEyeView ago

Sorry bro but I don't have a narrative. I just took a good enough look at Racine to know that the uber wealthy Johnson family runs that town and its obvious that secret societies have been in place there since its beginning. You are not even making any sense.

argosciv ago

Sorry bro but I don't have a narrative.

You are not even making any sense.

Oh but I am, and you do. Evidenced by this comment, wherein you spout a talking point identical (bar the wording) to that of those who push the narrative in question – while they're aware of the fact that my work quite clearly deviated from and abandoned their psy op narrative**.

At first I was going to say "on the off chance that you actually aren't familiar with my work...", but that ship sailed when I remembered I had seen this comment of yours earlier, wherein you display behavior and an attitude once again identical to the same 'conglomerate' of subversive users pushing various narratives including the one in question*.

* I dare you to claim that what I just said above is a defense of Trump. Go ahead, do it. See what happens.

 

Lo and behold, upon checking in further, you once again prove to be pushing the same narrative/agenda as the aforementioned 'conglomerate'.

All of this on top of your above comment where you claim I'm the one not making sense, which is – naturally – a common tactic aimed at dismissing/discrediting, in response to my pointing out that those familiar** with my work know that I did not toe the line regarding the Racine garbage.

** Spoiler: that refers to both the good people who I confer with and the subversives who have continuously waged campaigns against me for, once again, not toeing the line – which now very evidently includes you.

 

So, you see, this whole aloof / "you're not making any sense" act of yours falls apart at the seams due to no less than your own ego. You can't even hold your act together for more than a few comments before devolving to the same talking points as your cohorts and/or main account, when those you despise and target trigger you into revealing yourself.

The irony of course being this from you:

lol (mommy, somebody disagrees with me on the internet!)

Look at how you and your cohorts (or brainwashers – slim chance that you're a victim of their narrative rather than a pusher, though, given the particulars) have treated anyone who doesn't buy into the bullshit; organized brigading and harassment/stalking/smear/doxx campaigns.

@MadWorld @Vindicator @Crensch @EricKaliberhall @MolochHunter

BirdsEyeView ago

I am not gonna read all that. Whatever you say bro.

argosciv ago

You just wasted a couple of hours on searchvoat.

Actually, it was all right here in this submission, but good on you for behaving exactly like ES at every possible turn.

@MadWorld @Vindicator @Crensch @EricKaliberhall @MolochHunter

PizzaGates ago

So are you saying James Alefantis is Esoteric shade?

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

@argosciv prolly has wet brain syndrome, from all the drugs and alcohol he admittedly ingests.

It's why normal people don't listen to addicts. But for some reason other addicts seem to think he got smartz.

Since I'm the only person on Voat who has admitted to reading all of his "research", I can state without reservation, he is full of shit, and doesn't know what he is talking about over 90% of the time.

But what can you expect from someone who thinks he's a dragon, here to save the rest of us foolish mortals. pshhhh

Sad.

Vindicator ago

Interesting you would weigh in here to counter my exposure of the latest episode of Sock Puppet Theater. I thought you said you hated EsotericShade?

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

@NOMOCHOMO is NOT @DanglingGoatBalls

When you unban NOMO (after he agrees to quit being a cantankerous cunt), maybe I'll take your statement that you're "exposing" ES more seriously.

Have you tried to hash out your differences? I tried with youknowwho, never got anywhere.


I have a right to say what I think of fagos. I'll stop when he stops. Usually I just downvote his twatishness, and move on. But I couldn't this time.

If you would prefer, I can go back to calling his ass out on current submissions. I just don't want him to be brigaded for being an idiot, I just want him to stop.

Vindicator ago

So you're saying PizzaGates and BirdsEyeView are Nomo, socks, eh. Thanks!

You supposed to confirm the acting credits for this latest episode of Sock Puppet Theater?

There isn't a serious pizzagate researcher on this board who believes Nomo and ES are different, to my knowledge. I didn't get a single complaint when I banned them all, despite putting up a sticky. Not one. Other than from you. I did get a whole bunch of DMs thanking me, though.

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

So you're saying PizzaGates and BirdsEyeView are Nomo, socks, eh.

No, I'm not. Where did I say that? I said, 'ES and NOMO are different'. I don't know who BEV is.

You supposed to confirm the acting credits for this latest episode of Sock Puppet Theater?

What does this even mean? I don't know what 'sock puppet theater' is.

There isn't a serious pizzagate researcher on this board who believes Nomo and ES are different, to my knowledge.

Then you don't know much.

I didn't get a single complaint when I banned them all, despite putting up a sticky.

Anyone who complains gets accused of being in cahoots with your imaginary cabal. If not by you, then by fagos or crunchy.

I did get a whole bunch of DMs thanking me, though.

Name one who wasn't a mod.


Once again you didn't address one thing I said to you. Choosing instead to accuse me of falsehoods. Nice.

@heygeorge @MadWorld @think-

Vindicator ago

No, I'm not. Where did I say that? I said, 'ES and NOMO are different'.

Which was a direct response to a comment thread in which PizzaGates and BirdsEyeView got their panties in a wad because I pointed out that BirdsEyeView is the name of Alefantis' account. Since Nomo isn't in this thread because he is banned, it's clear you think those are his accounts. Otherwise, why would you bring him up?

And no, I am not going to share DM's. Nice try though.

I am completely stoked that NomoShade felt he had to make yet another set of sock puppets when I started spreading pizzagate research on Twitter. Made my day!

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

Interesting you would weigh in here to counter my exposure of the latest episode of Sock Puppet Theater.

So is this you admitting to being fagos? Cuz it sure can be read that way. Can't it?

Vindicator ago

This is an interesting new narrative. I doubt you'll get any traction with it, but you're welcome to try.

What logic would you use?

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

I don't think you're anyone but you. But I also didn't comment in order to "counter my exposure of the latest episode of Sock Puppet Theater." Do you honestly think that birdseyeview is the same as the old birdzeyeview alt, that was assumed to be JA? Or were you just fucking with him? I have a hard time believing you think it's the right thing for you to do, without proof. That's the problem with all the accusations being made. No proof. Vetting you, crunchy, fagos and SARSie accusations, is like trying to vet one of hojoruku's submissions. Tiring and time consuming. Wasting peoples time on unprovable shit.