Yah, like Dorsey & Alwaleed were already on my blacklist, but this didn't seem particularly obscene at first, since they still don't allow content, but just for clarity:

*The new rule adds gray legalistic language that such pedophile content is allowed “provided they don’t promote or glorify child sexual exploitation in any way.”

“Artistic depictions of nude minors in a non-sexualized context or setting may be permitted in a limited number of scenarios e.g., works by internationally renowned artists that feature minors,”*

I don't personally have a problem with Neoclassical or Renaissance works of nude fairies featuring on twitter, but then again I don't have any stakes because I don't give a fuck about twitter as a platform or a company. I agree that the letter written to director Starr is quite an unusually purposed request though:

https://www.docdroid.net/f2HaDtR/letter-to-twitter-re-maps-redacted-1.pdf

“In our professional opinions, terminating the accounts of non-offending, anti-contact MAPs is likely to result in the opposite effect of that which Twitter may expect or intend. Rather than reducing the incidence of child sexual abuse, if anything, it increases the risk that some pedophiles will be unable to obtain the peer or professional support that they may need in order to avoid offending behavior. It is also likely to increase the stigma and isolation associated with pedophilia and thereby increase the likelihood of some MAPs acting on their sexual feelings,”