Not going to comment on "frazzle-whatever" because I know nothing about it, really, and have never seen it.
However -- it seems blatantly obvious that DeepState sources are pushing hard on the existence of 'DeepFakes' as a prep for when they do end up dropping -- while also ignoring that similar computer technologies can look at DeepFakes "under the microscope" and detect the little glitches, blurs, whirs, and doo-dads that are the signiature of a faked video. Until we can simulate a reality, there really is no way to use CGI and NOT get these artifacts.
Obvious mental prep for blind-sheep followers that will balk at such material being submitted to a Grand Jury, because if it exists, it's never going to see the public domain. And why should it? Do you want to help glorify their actions and spread their reach, even under the pretense of absolute and unrelenting condemnation? Create a situation where Copycat SRA wannabies sprout up? Showing the videos publicly would be stomping on the victims' last moments, IMHO -- however the PUBLIC must be made aware that the videos are real and ensured (if true) that they weren't faked, have been vetted and verified by computer forensics experts with no political bias, the extent and frequency of the crimes committed, etc. The truth must be known, but a Satanist's high crimes must never be bandied about in a public atmosphere.... or they "win" their immortality through the notoriety such a public outing would bring.
Could be a little off here, but I just don't see a public rollout happening.
A) because there would be an overnight Revolution in the streets. (Most likely)
B) because viewing such material outside a criminal prosecution would be, in fact, breaking the law. (Totally true. Just don't view it. Don't even peek it. Turn the BirdBox blinders on and you're along for the ride once the Show starts -- if it starts.)
C) because of the Notoriety/Immortality thing described above. (Least likely)
'while also ignoring that similar computer technologies can look at DeepFakes "under the microscope" and detect the little glitches, blurs, whirs, and doo-dads that are the signiature of a faked video. Until we can simulate a reality, there really is no way to use CGI and NOT get these artifacts.'
Could you give me some references to this?- because I agree with you that once videos start dropping of them raping infants, they are going to use the 'muh deep fakes' execuse
view the rest of the comments →
BKAtheManScout ago
Not going to comment on "frazzle-whatever" because I know nothing about it, really, and have never seen it.
However -- it seems blatantly obvious that DeepState sources are pushing hard on the existence of 'DeepFakes' as a prep for when they do end up dropping -- while also ignoring that similar computer technologies can look at DeepFakes "under the microscope" and detect the little glitches, blurs, whirs, and doo-dads that are the signiature of a faked video. Until we can simulate a reality, there really is no way to use CGI and NOT get these artifacts.
Obvious mental prep for blind-sheep followers that will balk at such material being submitted to a Grand Jury, because if it exists, it's never going to see the public domain. And why should it? Do you want to help glorify their actions and spread their reach, even under the pretense of absolute and unrelenting condemnation? Create a situation where Copycat SRA wannabies sprout up? Showing the videos publicly would be stomping on the victims' last moments, IMHO -- however the PUBLIC must be made aware that the videos are real and ensured (if true) that they weren't faked, have been vetted and verified by computer forensics experts with no political bias, the extent and frequency of the crimes committed, etc. The truth must be known, but a Satanist's high crimes must never be bandied about in a public atmosphere.... or they "win" their immortality through the notoriety such a public outing would bring.
Could be a little off here, but I just don't see a public rollout happening.
A) because there would be an overnight Revolution in the streets. (Most likely)
B) because viewing such material outside a criminal prosecution would be, in fact, breaking the law. (Totally true. Just don't view it. Don't even peek it. Turn the BirdBox blinders on and you're along for the ride once the Show starts -- if it starts.)
C) because of the Notoriety/Immortality thing described above. (Least likely)
blacknighthigh ago
'while also ignoring that similar computer technologies can look at DeepFakes "under the microscope" and detect the little glitches, blurs, whirs, and doo-dads that are the signiature of a faked video. Until we can simulate a reality, there really is no way to use CGI and NOT get these artifacts.'
Could you give me some references to this?- because I agree with you that once videos start dropping of them raping infants, they are going to use the 'muh deep fakes' execuse