Wrong. Consent is the communication that you desire an action from someone that, absent consent, might be considered an act of aggressive violence. The age of the consenter has no bearing on someone's ability to give consent, except as it correlates with an inability to communicate. A 12 year old is perfectly capable of communicating consent, absent any mental defect, to sex, as is a 25 year old.
Nobody is asking you, I ask someone to do it and if we both agree that your head needs to be crushed its two consenting opinions, you yourselfe said thats all what it needed.
view the rest of the comments →
Niggardly_Jew ago
Not rape. Typical kike trick to manipulate semantics.
gamepwn ago
25 and 12 year old is rape. Fuck you.
Niggardly_Jew ago
Wrong. Rape is forced sex; consensual sex is not rape.
gamepwn ago
There is no consensual sex between a 25 and 12 year old asshole.
Niggardly_Jew ago
Wrong. Consent is the communication that you desire an action from someone that, absent consent, might be considered an act of aggressive violence. The age of the consenter has no bearing on someone's ability to give consent, except as it correlates with an inability to communicate. A 12 year old is perfectly capable of communicating consent, absent any mental defect, to sex, as is a 25 year old.
HeavyBrain ago
Strange how I can't give consent to buy booz and guns at age 12, despite clearly communicating that I want to get trashed and shoot at beer cans.
Niggardly_Jew ago
You can't "give consent" to buy something
Whether or not someone will trade with you depends on their voluntary action, not yours.
HeavyBrain ago
I guess you are right.
BRB finding someone who gives consent to crush Niggardly_Jew's skull.
Niggardly_Jew ago
And if I consented to have my head crushed, then it would be a strange form of suicide, not murder.
Just like when a 12 year old consents to have a penis stuffed inside of her, its sex not rape.
HeavyBrain ago
Nobody is asking you, I ask someone to do it and if we both agree that your head needs to be crushed its two consenting opinions, you yourselfe said thats all what it needed.
Niggardly_Jew ago
Wrong. I said that the consent of the one who owns the property (in this case, me) is required.
HeavyBrain ago
But I own the will and the other guy owns the means and you infringing on our consent doesnt work because its 2 against 1.
Niggardly_Jew ago
I'm really disappointed. I've always thought of you as at least reasonable. But I guess I was wrong.