Given the rest of the poem it appears to be about grieving the loss of the stillborn. And describing the feasting on ashes of loss may be a way to drive that home.
I've corrected some of my miss-takes on this case due to mistaken identity. The guy you are talking about is a different person, but has the same name as the person OP posted about.
Also, yes comments don't generally cross the same bar as submissions unless those comments are being used to confirm/help whether or not a submission itself does/can cross that bar. In this case no, yours didn't claim to do that outright. But still it's important for those who may read the thread briefly, to correct the record on mistaken identity within comments such as yours with the poem, so that they don't assume that the poet was part of a murder/suicide. Not a great time to have that name :-/ and be an author (especially of that poem).
I messed up on the submission when I found out it wasn't the poet. I assumed he wasn't a child author either (I read too fast) so had to bad track on comments I made to OP. It's an understandable case of mass confusion, the only real conflict between us had to do with interpreting that poem. I focused too much on that and not catching the mistaken identity. Live and learn. Cheers, sorry for getting irritated at you.
Writing that poem is not PG. Even the murder suicide is not PG from what we've seen so far. I doubt the guy is going be given kudos as a poet for writing a poem about eating a fetus.
Just because I disagree with your jump to conclusions doesn't make what I say wrong. It's not PG unless you come up with ties to an elite cult. Or a reason someone would want the family dead (aside from a husband who was likely mentally ill).
It's not concern trolling. It's keeping up the standard of research on the board. You are too lazy to provide any links to make your case and substantiate your opinion, instead you attack someone who does. If you don't think PG should stay on topic that's your problem, just don't try to force a non related post and act like it meets the standards for submissions with lifting a finger to explain why. Oh, because he used the word "feasting" in a title of a poem. Get the fuck out.
view the rest of the comments →
Oh_Well_ian ago
How can any honest and capable Investigator wrap up a case within an hour of viewing a crime scene involving the murder of an entire family?
No previous domestic violence?
Gee... why not check the banking records, associates and friends of the father before calling him a murderer?
kestrel9 ago
It's not about eating a stillborn fetus.
Oh_Well_ian ago
I take the meaning from the title.. poetry is highly subjective as you know, so there are no universal meaning in any poem
feasting?
kestrel9 ago
Given the rest of the poem it appears to be about grieving the loss of the stillborn. And describing the feasting on ashes of loss may be a way to drive that home.
Oh_Well_ian ago
lol please... is it not simply IRONIC that the title describes Pizzagate PERFECTLY
la la la…
read the rest of this dead guys drivel..
SUICIDE WEEKEND
kestrel9 ago
I've corrected some of my miss-takes on this case due to mistaken identity. The guy you are talking about is a different person, but has the same name as the person OP posted about.
Oh_Well_ian ago
yes… I gathered that and perhaps I could have looked closer but that was the very first hit that came back, sooo..
I do believe that comments do not have to cross the same bar as submissions, though.
kestrel9 ago
Also, yes comments don't generally cross the same bar as submissions unless those comments are being used to confirm/help whether or not a submission itself does/can cross that bar. In this case no, yours didn't claim to do that outright. But still it's important for those who may read the thread briefly, to correct the record on mistaken identity within comments such as yours with the poem, so that they don't assume that the poet was part of a murder/suicide. Not a great time to have that name :-/ and be an author (especially of that poem).
kestrel9 ago
I messed up on the submission when I found out it wasn't the poet. I assumed he wasn't a child author either (I read too fast) so had to bad track on comments I made to OP. It's an understandable case of mass confusion, the only real conflict between us had to do with interpreting that poem. I focused too much on that and not catching the mistaken identity. Live and learn. Cheers, sorry for getting irritated at you.
kestrel9 ago
Post links and I will read it.
Writing that poem is not PG. Even the murder suicide is not PG from what we've seen so far. I doubt the guy is going be given kudos as a poet for writing a poem about eating a fetus.
Just because I disagree with your jump to conclusions doesn't make what I say wrong. It's not PG unless you come up with ties to an elite cult. Or a reason someone would want the family dead (aside from a husband who was likely mentally ill).
Oh_Well_ian ago
I didn't post it, faggot.
Just because I don't agree with your concern trolling... blah blah blah..
It's faggots like you that are the reason this sub has 5 people on it, when it had 1500 before.
kestrel9 ago
It's not concern trolling. It's keeping up the standard of research on the board. You are too lazy to provide any links to make your case and substantiate your opinion, instead you attack someone who does. If you don't think PG should stay on topic that's your problem, just don't try to force a non related post and act like it meets the standards for submissions with lifting a finger to explain why. Oh, because he used the word "feasting" in a title of a poem. Get the fuck out.