Dillon the Hacker is a YouTuber. He's now apparently dead.
https://heavy.com/news/2019/08/dillon-the-hacker-dead/
But nobody knows exactly what happened...Some are even accusing it of being a stunt/troll
He's the first person who ever accused Dan Schneider of being a pedo on Video (2014)
https://youtu.be/ltbzdKB8jZE
In what appears to be a fictional rant, Dillon repeatedly references Dan's Jewish Heritage. Claims he dated Ariana Grande before she was famous and personally heard stories of sex slavery and ritualized abuse of nickelodeon stars.
Archive this Video, YouTube could purge his account: https://youtu.be/ltbzdKB8jZE
I still haven't made up my mind on this whole spectacle. Whether Dillon is dead or alive, his "death" can be used to bring more attention to Dan Schneider's pedo proclivity
view the rest of the comments →
EricKaliberhall ago
Possible Disinformation flair is activated.
NOMOCHOMO ago
Nothing in my post is possible disinfo.
My post covers both possibilities (hoax/real), so nobody can accuse me of later spreading a false narrative
I am reposting MSM news stories that mention online speculation about his death being a hoax
https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/tragedy-mystery-over-dillon-hackers-19036892
The official narrative is no details have emerged regarding his death. Thus, it is a developing story.
@vindicator @shewhomustbeobeyed is this "possible disinfo" flair warranted?
Multiple MSM sites say it may be a hoax. The accusations of it being a "troll/hoax" are a necessary to fully encompass the story.
Flairing the post as "possible disinfo" (when I dont commit to either narrative) actually keeps people from reading it and considering if it is disinfo or not.
think- ago
Then you should have chosen another headline. Your headline says 'Youtube Star dead'. And yes, headlines need to be accurate, or they will get flaired.
QanadaHere ago
You are a tard. the title states exactly what the article says. Eat shit.