Prince Andrew jets home as pictures emerge of him partying with the billionaire paedophile and Donald Trump in 2000 (pizzagate)

submitted ago by letsdothis3

The Daily Mail is going after Randy Andy in a big way. Article here: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7410073/Prince-Andrew-jets-home-Spanish-golfing-holiday-Jeffrey-Epstein-crisis-talks.html

Yesterday it was revealed lawyers for Epstein's victims were considering bringing a lawsuit to pressure Andrew to give evidence in the long-running scandal.

David Boies, chairman of a high-profile New York law firm, claims 'there is too much evidence' connecting the Duke to the paedophile financier 'for the allegations to simply go away'.

He said the prince was 'continuing to delay and obfuscate' over repeated claims he had sex with one of Epstein's teenage victims.

Mr Boies urged Andrew to agree to an informal interview, as it would be the best way for him to 'advance his interests' if he 'really has nothing to hide'.

The lawyer said he has asked to interview the prince and is willing to travel to London to make the process more comfortable for him.

But if this does not happen, Mr Boies said he would consider bringing a lawsuit to pressure him and other associates of Epstein to give evidence under oath.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

think- ago

Speaking of Trump, here is he starting at the breasts of a 17-year-old girl -

https://twitter.com/darinp2/status/1163015847687798784

kestrel9 ago

Are you implying that Trump had something to do with violating girls?

Giuffre Said Trump Did Not Abuse Her or Other Underage Girls, to Her Knowledge

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/08/what-the-unsealed-epstein-documents-reveal-about-trump.html

kazza64 ago

was there or was there not a court case where trump and epstein were accused of raping an underage girl

kestrel9 ago

There was an accuser who was a scammer, as I recall the story was first shopped around for $$$ to the tabloids and they didn't bite. And later several further attempts were made to give DT bad press before the election by attempting lawsuits, one was filed by a patent lawyer, one was where the defendant represented herself. A case was dropped, dismissed, refiled. If I recall correctly at some point the effort involved a Bush donor/bundler behind the scenes reviving the failed story/case. I don't have that info and beyond the following info, I am not going to be rehashing this already hashed out story against Trump.

Regarding the Katie Johnson accusations

It was thrown out of four civil courts, because when they tried to contact "Ms. Johnson," the address she gave turned out to be fake, as was her phone number. In fact, everything written on the document was fraudulent.

But it was enough for the Clinton machine to muddy the waters and create a false equivalency between Bill Clinton's documented real-life, authenticated victims (who've been around for decades) and Trump's shadowy, invisible, just-appeared-for-the-campaign victims . . . who conveniently melted back into the Ether after the election. link

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit-dropped-230770

:

Two earlier suits were filed over the same alleged events.

The first suit over the alleged rapes was filed in federal court in Riverside, California, in April by someone acting without an attorney and using the name "Katie Johnson." That suit named both Trump and Epstein as defendants

Subsequent news reports raised doubts about who filed the suit. Johnson claimed she had just $300 in assets and that she was living at a home in Twentynine Palms, California, but Radar Online reported neighbors said the home had been foreclosed upon and vacant since its owner died last year.

U.S. District Court Judge Dolly Gee dismissed that case in May 2016 , ruling that Johnson's complaint didn't raise valid claims under federal law. Gee, an appointee of President Barack Obama, noted that the suit cited a criminal statute that doesn't give rise to civil damages and that the civil statute Johnson cited only applies to actions based on "race-based or class-based animus."