I've heard many people saying that they've reconsidered Pizzagate since Epstein got arrested, and people realized that he was indeed providing rape slaves for a lot of rich and famous people.
I think this is the reason that the DDOS attacks on Voat are still ongoing. Imagine how many people would check our posts and our archive if they were able to access Voat.
We had about 450 visitors on v/pizzagate after Epstein got arrested, now we have about 25 on average.
And the ones who stay are tough...........think some people are using visitors IP addresses for hacking.....have seen notices in red that they are saved ........hacking not mentioned . It is called doxxing..............But I got a bad threat with a recent hack.
We need to come up with another way to get the word out that we're sitting on the motherload. Twitter is probably the solution -- screencap the submissions, post on Twitter.
yeah you do I was one of those redditors linking to voat and helping bring traffick over and wake people up. When you guys made it so only voat users could see content I was like thank god I have this account I made one day but never really used to I could still stay informed.
What sucks though is that then people cannot click the links.
Basically, OPs would have to put all links at the bottom of the post, so that people without Voat account can read the linked articles or watch the videos.
And I don't have a Twitter account, although I regularly read tweets.
I can only refer to what I wrote above, never took screenshots though.
We used to have about 150 visitors usually before the Epstein story broke, then after his arrest it went up to 450 visitors, since the DDOS attacks started, and Voat got closed down for all people who don't have an account, we have about 25. :-(
Is Twitter really that effective at informing people? For posting updates & developments? I mean forgive me, I never registered except for two minutes to message a celebrity & then deleted the account, but how does the structure of Twitter really work? Do people flock to dedicated accounts that regularly post? Do people find these accounts by comments on famous tweeters? Do we barrage famous twitter handles, in the same way we do now? Or is all the info contained in popular tweet's comment chains, acting like an image board? Are memes & infographics the best way to wake people, as in the way QAnon intended us to use? Where do most Twitter users visit each day? Is there a home page with trending tweets, then their selected feed? I'll assume we cannot count on controlled Twitter to give us any fair leeway in regards to trends, so do we just raid? Do we set up our own dedicated handles? Do more handles help, or less for quality? Do more hashtags help, or less for simplicity?
Been seriously considering this same problem, how in the heck to communicate as the deplatformed...
Reddit's conspiracy subred is hitting some MAJOR traffic lately, ever since Epstein, but I don't have the numbers now. They do roundtables, cover a fifth more topics than we do, have more posts per minute than you can read, and are very up-to-date with headlines. Say what you want about corrupt mods & their bad history, there's so many users active right now and I've seen surprisingly level-headed vets & newcomers get their due attention, staying on point & being intelligently self-critical when needed. I'd say they're a mix between us & Twitter right now, they don't do as in-depth research, but are more social-friendly & straightforward. Should reddit be considered too?
I would say Twitter is the main battleground, because it's where Trump has chosen to take on the MSM and the rest of Social Media, causing Trump supporters to be there. Those supporters and their real life personal networks are the way around the censorship (or "underneath" it, if you will).
The problem with Twitter is that it compartmentalizes you based on what kind of content you post so you basically end up in an echo chamber no matter what. Twitter should definitely be utilized but reddit is important as well, large subs regularly have Epstein related top posts these days and there’s a new r/Epstein subreddit full of people who genuinely don’t know shit about anything going on. As long as you don’t use the word “pizza” people will hear you out.
I was pretty impressed with the huge influx of reddit refugees that flocked to voat after that qanon sub got abruptly shut down over there.
The overall temperment seemed to consist of somewhat gullible (naive?) people, but generally intelligent, engaged, and willing to listen to many sides of a topic.
view the rest of the comments →
think- ago
I've heard many people saying that they've reconsidered Pizzagate since Epstein got arrested, and people realized that he was indeed providing rape slaves for a lot of rich and famous people.
I think this is the reason that the DDOS attacks on Voat are still ongoing. Imagine how many people would check our posts and our archive if they were able to access Voat.
We had about 450 visitors on v/pizzagate after Epstein got arrested, now we have about 25 on average.
Lansing-Michigan ago
And the ones who stay are tough...........think some people are using visitors IP addresses for hacking.....have seen notices in red that they are saved ........hacking not mentioned . It is called doxxing..............But I got a bad threat with a recent hack.
Vindicator ago
We need to come up with another way to get the word out that we're sitting on the motherload. Twitter is probably the solution -- screencap the submissions, post on Twitter.
Clairvoyance ago
yeah you do I was one of those redditors linking to voat and helping bring traffick over and wake people up. When you guys made it so only voat users could see content I was like thank god I have this account I made one day but never really used to I could still stay informed.
think- ago
What sucks though is that then people cannot click the links.
Basically, OPs would have to put all links at the bottom of the post, so that people without Voat account can read the linked articles or watch the videos.
And I don't have a Twitter account, although I regularly read tweets.
Vindicator ago
I know. I wish the Putt would whitelist the archive sites so we could archive stuff -- then the links would work.
think- ago
Ask him maybe?
Vindicator ago
If I can get solid statistics showing how badly we've taken a hit, absolutely.
think- ago
Thank you.
I can only refer to what I wrote above, never took screenshots though.
We used to have about 150 visitors usually before the Epstein story broke, then after his arrest it went up to 450 visitors, since the DDOS attacks started, and Voat got closed down for all people who don't have an account, we have about 25. :-(
Otto- ago
Is Twitter really that effective at informing people? For posting updates & developments? I mean forgive me, I never registered except for two minutes to message a celebrity & then deleted the account, but how does the structure of Twitter really work? Do people flock to dedicated accounts that regularly post? Do people find these accounts by comments on famous tweeters? Do we barrage famous twitter handles, in the same way we do now? Or is all the info contained in popular tweet's comment chains, acting like an image board? Are memes & infographics the best way to wake people, as in the way QAnon intended us to use? Where do most Twitter users visit each day? Is there a home page with trending tweets, then their selected feed? I'll assume we cannot count on controlled Twitter to give us any fair leeway in regards to trends, so do we just raid? Do we set up our own dedicated handles? Do more handles help, or less for quality? Do more hashtags help, or less for simplicity?
Been seriously considering this same problem, how in the heck to communicate as the deplatformed...
Reddit's conspiracy subred is hitting some MAJOR traffic lately, ever since Epstein, but I don't have the numbers now. They do roundtables, cover a fifth more topics than we do, have more posts per minute than you can read, and are very up-to-date with headlines. Say what you want about corrupt mods & their bad history, there's so many users active right now and I've seen surprisingly level-headed vets & newcomers get their due attention, staying on point & being intelligently self-critical when needed. I'd say they're a mix between us & Twitter right now, they don't do as in-depth research, but are more social-friendly & straightforward. Should reddit be considered too?
Vindicator ago
I would say Twitter is the main battleground, because it's where Trump has chosen to take on the MSM and the rest of Social Media, causing Trump supporters to be there. Those supporters and their real life personal networks are the way around the censorship (or "underneath" it, if you will).
EyesLikeTheSky ago
The problem with Twitter is that it compartmentalizes you based on what kind of content you post so you basically end up in an echo chamber no matter what. Twitter should definitely be utilized but reddit is important as well, large subs regularly have Epstein related top posts these days and there’s a new r/Epstein subreddit full of people who genuinely don’t know shit about anything going on. As long as you don’t use the word “pizza” people will hear you out.
Onetime1 ago
I was pretty impressed with the huge influx of reddit refugees that flocked to voat after that qanon sub got abruptly shut down over there.
The overall temperment seemed to consist of somewhat gullible (naive?) people, but generally intelligent, engaged, and willing to listen to many sides of a topic.