You're welcome. I've been downvoted but I stand by my remarks, as I think that even though Mr. Sanger didn't confirm Pizzagate, he is acknowledging being wrong in the past about elite pedophilia rings, and is coming around to the truth.
I know a lot of people here think that everyone who is an "important" person who denies Pizzagate must be complicit in the conspiracy, and I thought this way myself for some time, but from talking to and observing people I have noticed that some otherwise intelligent persons are simply too indoctrinated and brainwashed to consider Pizzagate to be real, and will argue against it without even considering for a split second that it could be real. This includes journalists, many of whom are young, inexperienced in the world and relatively ignorant.
With that being said, Wikipedia has shown itself to be dominated by authors who are apparently working for the wrong side.
view the rest of the comments →
Zorrilla ago
http://archive.is/bpMD5
This shows an important step in the right direction.
Vindicator ago
Thanks for adding that link, @Zorrilla.
Zorrilla ago
You're welcome. I've been downvoted but I stand by my remarks, as I think that even though Mr. Sanger didn't confirm Pizzagate, he is acknowledging being wrong in the past about elite pedophilia rings, and is coming around to the truth.
I know a lot of people here think that everyone who is an "important" person who denies Pizzagate must be complicit in the conspiracy, and I thought this way myself for some time, but from talking to and observing people I have noticed that some otherwise intelligent persons are simply too indoctrinated and brainwashed to consider Pizzagate to be real, and will argue against it without even considering for a split second that it could be real. This includes journalists, many of whom are young, inexperienced in the world and relatively ignorant.
With that being said, Wikipedia has shown itself to be dominated by authors who are apparently working for the wrong side.
Vindicator ago
I agree with you