Relevance: What could be more relevant than the discrediting of SRA and children being abused? Children's veracity and memories are central to combating the widespread victimization and this woman has made a living casting doubt and insisting everything is a lie. The book Satan's Silence that she co-authored with Michael Snedeker:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debbie_Nathan

examined and aimed to debunk the wave of satanic ritual abuse allegations that took place beginning in the 1980s.

She is now on Twitter, hysterically tweeting about immigration and concentration camps.

Hello and welcome to this edition of SPOTLIGHT ON. Today it’s on Debbie Nathan, a woman who has taken the entire subject of psychology, ritual abuse, and children speaking for themselves on by the power she has granted herself. It has to be that because she has absolutely no credentials to be speaking on anything except maybe being a globalist whore. Here’s her bio taken from the above Wikipedia link:

Nathan was born in 1950 into a Jewish family in Houston, Texas. She received her B.A. from Temple University in 1972, after first attending Shimer College, a very small Great Books college in Illinois.[7] She went on to receive a master's degree in linguistics from the University of Texas El Paso.

Nathan taught English as a second language at Brooklyn College, then moved to Chicago in 1980, where she began her journalism career at the Chicago Reader. She returned to El Paso in 1984 to work for the El Paso Times, then became a freelance journalist. In 1998, she took a job writing for the San Antonio Current, then moved to New York City in 2000.[8] Nathan is a board member for the National Center for Reason and Justice, non-profit organization that aids people likely to have been falsely accused and/or convicted of harming children.

Do you see any advanced degrees in behavioral psychology, children's development, family dynamics. No BS, MS, PhD, PsyD degrees‎, nonetheless, she's thrown herself in there as an authority. Believe that was Pelosi's definition of a Wrap-Up Smear. Tell a lie, have an authority give it credibility, and you something everyone will be repeating. Well, apparently, Ms. Nathan provided that credibility for being a leftist, raving lunatic feminist.

Before I get underway, I want to say that I believe we've veered off the very effective methodology of turning spotlights on those involved in supporting the elite cabal. It happened wonderfully when applied to James Alefantis and his squad (that's the new buzzword for posse), and I would like to see more of it done. This is the resurrection of old school pizzagate and Debbie, my girl, you're tagged ''it'' for today. It’s in shining lights on people we make the rats scatter. We can also make new connections by seeing who they support and who supports them.

I came across Ms. Nathan's name when doing research on another subject. I came across an article on Michael Aquino and the nefarious Presidio Day Care Scandal.

https://ritualabuse.us/ritualabuse/articles/the-dark-tunnels-of-mcmartin-dr-roland-c-summit-journal-of-psychohistory/

The Dark Tunnels of McMartin Dr. Roland C. Summit Journal of Psychohistory

FALSE ARGUMENTS

The subject of ritual cult abuse of children is so loathsome and provocative that it is at risk of being regarded only in extremes. Those drawn into believing that there is such a thing become fascinated and terrified by its limitless implications while those who remain skeptical seem determined to quash and disqualify any evidence that it might exist. ...

Having met Ms. Johnson in February, 1984, I am convinced of the first option. Judy Johnson was quite sane and emotionally contained even as she described the improbable complaints of her child “He doesn’t like to talk about being buried alive or about large animals or that he was sodomized by a lion”. (3) Such complaints were unheard of in 1984, but they made more sense as older, less credulous children in the Netherlands (1987), England (1988) and North Carolina (1989) made quite independent observations that the wild animals had zippers on their costumes. …

With the above example of how the human mind can interpret what a child says given, it then recites physical evidence of the McMartin case including the excavation of those tunnels. He also says this:

At this point in the vastly larger, festering issue of ritual abuse, there is little hope of hard evidence for anything, especially for specific, ultimately trivial issues of individual criminal culpability. Frank Fuster’s conviction served best to excite more ingenious efforts toward blaming the victims. In the absence of a published tunnel report, the last word in print remains with award-winning Debbie Nathan:

At that point, I went looking for this Debbie Nathan. It's how I discovered she'd written an article published by the Village Voice and whose traces appeared to have vanished. She complains that it's a censoring conspiracy, but is it more likely that in light of more evidence, it was taken down so that it couldn't be hacked apart? But through perseverance, here it is, posted on the National Center for Reason and Justice's site:

https://ncrj.org/get-informed-2/the-ritual-sex-abuse-hoax/ https://web.archive.org/web/20170223071409/https://ncrj.org/get-informed-2/the-ritual-sex-abuse-hoax/

Irrationality pervaded the McMartin case from the beginning. The first allegation came from a woman alter diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic. After Judy Johnson noticed one day in 1983 that her two-year-old son’s bottom was red, she told police he said something about a man named Ray at his nursery school. In the next few weeks, Johnson accused 25-year-old Buckey of donning a mask and sodomizing her child while sticking his head in a toilet; of wearing a cape while taping the boy’s mouth, hands, and eyes; and of sticking an air tube in his rectum. She also said Ray made the child ride naked on a horse and molested him while dressed as a cop, fireman, clown, and Santa Claus. Later, she claimed that the McMartin teachers, including Ray’s 57-year-old mother, Peggy, jabbed a scissors into the boy’s eyes and staples in his ears, nipples, and tongue; that Ray put her son’s finger into a goat’s anus; and that Peggy killed a baby and made the boy drink the blood. She also told the D.A.’s office than an AWOL marine and three models in a health club had raped her son, and that the family dog was sodomized as well.

Did everything in the above happen as stated? I'm not sure, but I'll bet it's not off the mark by a lot. A lot of this has been stated by other children who were proven to be victims of SRA, but Ms. Nathan knows it's all hysteria.

I went to her Twitter account and found this:

https://imgur.com/19UqndA

https://twitter.com/DebbieNathan2

Debbie Nathan @DebbieNathan2 West Texas-based, independent journalist writing mostly about immigration. Author of Satan's Silence, and Sybil Exposed. [email protected]

And here she’s reliving the Satanic Panic days and the role she played in deceiving so that perhaps some could get away with their crimes.

https://imgur.com/a/y32ZoZ0

SAFF is big proponent of hers. Here is their account: https://twitter.com/SAFFtweets

SAFF @SAFFtweets The S.A.F.F. is a not-for-profit organisation inaugurated in 1988 to protect minority religions and alternative beliefs from victimisation and suppression.

Yes, Baphomet needs protecting from victimization. No doubt.

Here is one of Nathan’s bizarre tweets. I’ll see if anything about this case is on the web:

https://imgur.com/a/wYeBoYD

Goddamn, yeah! I believe I did find. Quite a story. Just about every story found debunked it, but what's this? After a few years, there are two arrests for a story that isn't true?

http://jewishmom.com/2014/08/06/bh-another-nachlaot-pedophile-convicted/

Nachlaot Pedophile, Zalman Cohen, Convicted!

Debbie Nathan has also debunked multiple personalities vis a vis her book Sybil and that pornography is harmful:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debbie_Nathan

Pornography, published in 2007, is written as a concise "guidebook" on the subject of pornography.[15] A Canadian reviewer described the writing as "frank and cool", and made note of Nathan's assertion that no connection has been established between the use of pornography and criminal behavior, as well as her focus on the "connection between porn and shame" to define pornography

Yes, even though Ted Bundy attested to it being an integral part of what made him want to rape and kill and Elizabeth Smart’s testimony that:

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/elizabeth-smart-her-captivity-pornography-made-my-living-hell-worse-n635066

'Pornography Made My Living Hell Worse'

Ms. Nathan knows better. Or perhaps she’s the type of feminist who feels women should suffer more? Ms. Nathan is quoted on numerous sites and is featured whenever a Satanic debunking takes place. Here’s a site that I’m sure you’ll find amusing.

http://theisticsatanism.com/asp/intro.html

This one lists five key points to debunking Satanism. Number 2 is:

There is no evidence of a generations-old worldwide Satanic conspiracy. And the most influential and seminal Christian books alleging such a conspiracy, such as The Satan-Seller by Mike Warnke, have been shown to be outright frauds.

Really? Then I guess we can all pack our bags and go home.