Chatting to an Anon on 8/QR. Rachel Chandler pops up. I always thought she was just some street urchin. He said she was part of the LA Times Chandler Dynasty. Never heard of that before. Quick search and up pops her wedding photos.
Check out slide 4. You couldn't make it up. It's so fucking blatant.
here https://www.vogue.com/slideshow/rachel-chandler-guinness-wedding-photos#4
view the rest of the comments →
letsdothis3 ago
How about trying our own database too https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Avoat.co+rachel+chandler+wedding&rlz=1C1CHBD_en-GBGB745GB745&oq=site%3Avoat.co+rachel+chandler+wedding&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i58.9621j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
auralsects ago
Not only does Q recycle our info but his acolytes recycle his recycling. But hey as long as you wamen can be cordial with the very civil and mature if total Trump shill @Vindickeater, that's what matters XD
siegnagel ago
I'm not talking about Q. It's up to you what you believe. I was simply on a Q board when Chandler came up, nothing more nothing less.
letsdothis3 ago
I'm one of the few calling out the recycling XD
Onetime1 ago
"Recycling" may be an accurate, yet exceptionally inappropriate description for the continuing, ever-widening ripples of information that are spreading globally.
I have seen countless instances of data that is 'old hat' to many of us who have been monitoring these affairs for decades being described as "bombshell/breaking" by folks who encounter it for the first time.
We are honored to play the vital role of information uncoverers and disseminators.