You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

think- ago

Sorry, are we looking into each death that has not been ruled to be a death by natural causes now - ´ really don't see any Pizzagate relevance here in this case. Maybe better post to v/GreatAwakening. Thanks.

theooeht ago

Are you a moderator?

Who are you again?

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

Are you a moderator?

She was, for quite awhile.

You must be new here.

Do you think that the users of v/pizzagate don't have a right to ask you how the death of someone who has not been directly linked to any of the previous submissions might be relevant? Or that we can't suggest that you post it to a more relevant sub?

Show us how this woman is tied in, won't you?

@Vindicator @think-

theooeht ago

I think maybe she shouldn't be calling people "pedophile enablers" for starters. She really does have a big mouth. You will agree on that, won't you?

I'm not sure if another member should question whether a post should be under a subverse. I'd have to think about it. I do feel members should be able to ask questions ... definitely. As to what she has to do with it, the background given ticks all the boxes of someone being involved in pizzagate ... including the link I just posted about Uzbekistan, the country where she was to host a trade summit, being one of the purveyors and violates of children for sex trafficking. That is a huge connection do you not think? Because if you don't, I might remind you that everyone thought it a big deal when Podesta hosted summits. The same with all the rest of the crew.

In terms of other connections, as I said in the OP, that I was posting it because it ticked the boxes and that I would try to go digging for additional information. It's what I did with the Linda Collins-Smith post. While I looked @Vindator flared it with an accuracy query and I had no problem with that. I fully understood and was prepared for it to be taken down or left up with the flair. So if this .... this rude skank person said something along those lines and asked @Vindicator to get involved in the flair ... again no problem.

And now that I've had time to think, no, I don't think an OP owes an explanation to a member about what subverse they put a post in. IF the post doesn't belong there, it's a moderator's job. So the member certainly can tag them if they wish.

think- ago

I think maybe she shouldn't be calling people "pedophile enablers" for starters.

I think it is appropriate to call someone 'pedo enabler' who says it's ok to employ pedos as long as you don't socialize with them after work.

And regarding your post - it is clearly forum sliding, and has nothing to do with Pizzagate, judging from what you wrote in your OP.

We have covered all major institutions in our Pizzagate research. They all have incredibly high numbers of employees. If we start digging up newspaper articles about every person who worked for them and died, we'll end up with a cluttered thread, where the really relevant post get buried.

Your post f.i. pushed the posts about the arrest of 'Dr Pizza' down the thread.

Like it or not, I care for this board.

Have a nice day.

@shewhomustbeobeyed @Vindicator @Crensch @SandHog

shewhomustbeobeyed ago

Waste of time. You've been blocked because I asked questions.

Twiddletwat here doesn't like being questioned. Maybe because it's a forum sliding troll. idk

I think it is appropriate to call someone 'pedo enabler' who says it's ok to employ pedos as long as you don't socialize with them after work

Did this idiot say that? If so I'm glad I missed it when responding, I might have gotten mad.

think- ago

Yep .