You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

Thanks for posting this, @theooeht. I'm going to give this our "Accuracy in Question" flair for now, due to the sketchy nature of the blog you've linked as the source for the claims about her investigating DHS and CPS corruption. It's got all the markers of a fake news site. We're probably being trolled, like we were with the Asian attorney that was shot in Atlanta a couple years ago.

It's very suspicious they do not link to any verifiable source for the claims about the grant or that she was investigating it. And here's what you find when you go to the "About" section of the site:

In an effort to effect change, the SPEAK PROJECT team has done our best to expose the errors in the psyops by revealing the entire story behind the intel. We’ve created messages that resonate with everyone and tweeted them out to the masses. We’ve written articles to teach people and raise the vibration of the planet, hoping to break out from this dome under which we’ve all been living.

I am happy to remove the flair if we can corroborate the claims from the first link via more reliable sources.

theooeht ago

Holy Christ did I find validation! It's explosive. She actually was in on an investigation that involved Medicaid/Obamacare/Healthcare money and all this leads to the Clinton Foundation. It also leads to uncovering the war being waged that I didn't know anything about. It goes back to Sessions, his appointing Huber, planefuls of documents (remember Assange's PAPER PLANES?), and gigabytes of information.

You have to read the entirety of the two links put under EDIT at the bottom of the OP.

I really think this should be Shared, but it's not my decision.

Thanks!

Vindicator ago

Great work! I've changed the flair to "Potential Lead" because I think folks ought to do more digging on her to see what additional threads can be teased out.

She was originally elected as a Democrat, but switched parties. Makes me wonder if she found out something.

theooeht ago

Yes, me, too.

Or it could mean she was privy to a lot of stuff. The fact that she switched soon after being elected made me think it was that possibility rather than others.

If you read what she supported, it's everything the Dems don't support. Like Righ to Life, etc. I'm also wondering if something can be gleaned from the election she lost. Was she targeted? She could have done even more good had she been in office. Then there's another avenue that I haven't opened up yet. It might be fruitful.

Thanks for the Potential Lead flair. I really do hope people dig into this because there are some really good diggers on this forum.

Blacksmith21 ago

So I'm straight:

  • She went Dem to R
  • There is a sourced connection to charities used to funnel money through a Clinton front.
  • Other grants required a minimum number of "Rescues" from CPS departments in AR.
  • Murdered found wrapped in a blanket. A woman would be easy to overpower, roll up in a blanket, and double tap. It keeps the mess and the evidence way down.
  • The DOJ planes seen in Little Rock leaving with pallets of documents is related to an investigation of the money laundering scam?

theooeht ago

Yes.

Everything is tied together, and her not backing down on the resignation when senator probably got her targeted for her Senate seat first. But, like Nancy Schaefer, she wouldn't stop. With the DOJ coming down hard, probably didn't want any loose ends ... or maybe she knew something. Could also be they thought she was vulnerable to blackmail or coercion? When she wouldn't buckle ... blanket... gun....

And the body was found outside the home. It's another good way to cut down on DNA.