Didn’t see a single thing worthy of suspicion in this account. Let’s be sure not to make something out of nothing. Normal people being put under the microscope of a bunch of online randoms does nothing good for this movement
I’d say Jeff smith certainly has some suspicious behavior but knowing somebody doesn’t justify suspicion.
Not alone anyways. Just think you should have a justifiable reason before sending a bunch of internet folk to dig up everything they can on a normal guy.
Do you think Valerie Wiseman is suspicious because of her obvious ties to Pegaus Museum and her odd comment about Pizzagate? Or is James Alefantis suspicious because of all facts about him and surrounding him? And a few good others you will find and obviously directly connected to this account of jamesblamesyou. I've posted him because a lot of core Pizzagate guys were liking his activity and he posted pedo van meme - that's why I thought he's interesting. Honestly I don't know if he's normal guy or not, in this case I'm very careful about what I'm saying, I'm doing this for research purpose.
Do you think if there are at least 4 or 5 ( beside mentioned ) accounts from core Pizzagate crew liking activity of this man then digging into his activity is justified? I think it is, I'm not even labelling him as pedo, I have similar case of Michael Giacalone who's not only connected but interestingly he's using nickname similar to owner of darkweb pedophile site. This is research stuff so it's not conclusive.
view the rest of the comments →
DontDelete ago
Didn’t see a single thing worthy of suspicion in this account. Let’s be sure not to make something out of nothing. Normal people being put under the microscope of a bunch of online randoms does nothing good for this movement
Heisenberg123 ago
There's a lot of suspicious ties of this guy to core ( most suspicious ) Pizzagate crew. That's why he's here on Voat.
DontDelete ago
Like what
Heisenberg123 ago
Look closely at my post and research findings back from 2016 - especially about Jeff Smith and Valerie Wiseman.
DontDelete ago
I still don’t see anything suspicious.
Heisenberg123 ago
In Jeff Smith or him being connected to Jeff? ;)
DontDelete ago
I’d say Jeff smith certainly has some suspicious behavior but knowing somebody doesn’t justify suspicion.
Not alone anyways. Just think you should have a justifiable reason before sending a bunch of internet folk to dig up everything they can on a normal guy.
Edit: add on
Heisenberg123 ago
Do you think Valerie Wiseman is suspicious because of her obvious ties to Pegaus Museum and her odd comment about Pizzagate? Or is James Alefantis suspicious because of all facts about him and surrounding him? And a few good others you will find and obviously directly connected to this account of jamesblamesyou. I've posted him because a lot of core Pizzagate guys were liking his activity and he posted pedo van meme - that's why I thought he's interesting. Honestly I don't know if he's normal guy or not, in this case I'm very careful about what I'm saying, I'm doing this for research purpose.
DontDelete ago
I do think they’re suspicious. The reasons i think they’re suspicious are not present in this guys case as far as i can tell.
Heisenberg123 ago
Do you think if there are at least 4 or 5 ( beside mentioned ) accounts from core Pizzagate crew liking activity of this man then digging into his activity is justified? I think it is, I'm not even labelling him as pedo, I have similar case of Michael Giacalone who's not only connected but interestingly he's using nickname similar to owner of darkweb pedophile site. This is research stuff so it's not conclusive.