We are getting to the stage where anyone who supports a paedophile is lauded as 'brave', so much so that they write plays about how 'brave' they are to forgive and accept the paedophile in their life. Maddie Corman wrote a play about how brave she was to stay married to a paedophile and to allow him to live under the same roof as their three children, thus putting them at risk. No, she didn't chuck him to the curb; she monetised her 'courage' in forgiving this wonderful man, Jace Alexander, a convicted sex offender.
Hollywood's elite stepped out to support Corman on the opening night of her play 'Accidentally Brave', which was about her 'courage' in supporting her paedophile husband Jace Alexander, who was charged possessing and sharing illegal and obscene performances of sexual conduct by a child under 17. He was sentenced to 10 years probation and had to register as a sex offender. Jace was known for directing several episodes of Law and Order.
Despite years of subsequent therapy, Corman states, “Our family didn’t just stop being because something terrible happened.” 'Something terrible happened'?? Yes, in her mind the only terrible thing that happened, happened to her and her family. There's not one iota of concern for the children exploited, trafficked and raped and whose lives were destroyed in the child abuse material that her husband got off on and masturbated over.
Corman disregarded the safety of her children and allowed him to continue living under the same roof. She is a rape apologist and a paedophile supporter, and so are all the 'stars' who attended the premier. The play has a twitter account where there are stars like Ben Stiller giving her a big hug.
#AccidentallyBrave
view the rest of the comments →
carmencita ago
However, as Maddie Corman will tell you herself, this is not her husband’s story or her children’s, for that matter. This is the story of how Ms. Corman fights to keep her family together while confronting a personal tsunami. How does a person weather such a storm? At first there are questions from well-meaning friends and curious onlookers: “Did you know?” “Did he ever touch any young girls?” “What are your thoughts on porn?” Then people weigh in with a barrage of comments: “I would divorce him.” “Don’t divorce him.” “My husband died, but that’s much better than what you are going through.” There is public scrutiny, and professional and social repercussions. Finally, there is Ms. Corman’s fear that her best friend and life partner of almost twenty years will face jail time.
WHAT? Yeah, God forbid he has to face jail time. Porn? Do people even realize what that is and then showing it to a Child? They are trying to take away from the attention on her husband and him living with their Children. They are making her the main subject Not Him. In other words, Letting Him Off the Hook. Sick Sick Sick. But this is how Pedowood operates.
Piscina ago
Yes, this is NOT adult porn where there is a modicum of consent between adults (albeit mostly damaged). Children they must be drugged to be raped to do these things on camera for their 'audience' of criminals.. And that's not taking into account that most of these children are procured by abduction and/or trafficking. Did she give a moment's thoughts to the children? No.
carmencita ago
Right. These sickos care only for their own sick perverted cravings. This is the worst. Covering for her pedo hub.