2 things. . . Acosta when he made the sweetheart deal.. may have only had that option to get Epstein into court. There was no real way to make most of the charges stick due to law jurisdictions and rules and blah-blah's and a whole load of bullshit put in place to benefit rich criminals. IE.. no conviction, aquittement and impossiblity to get tried AGAIN for the same crimes. (again.. Ricjh criminals putting backdoors and loopholes in place to assure they dont go to prison..)
2nd thing.. Trump has been against human trafficking since the start. With Acosta's well known role in the 'deal', is it compatible that he would get into Trump's cabinet? Keeping enemies closer? Or hiding your hand until it's time to testify... (how do you get evidence accepted?)
So hard to be sure what's happening anymore..
Yep. This is why I am tracking it closely. It makes no sense. Check out this recent piece by Imperator Rex (who was forced off Twitter for debunking the Russian collusion farce over a year ago and has since been proven right):
You'd think with all of these claims, they would have been able to make at least one criminal claim stick over the years. In my opinion, it basically leaves two possibilities:
Trump isn't a criminal and has been trying to drain the swamp for decades.
Trump is a criminal who has been working for decades as an FBI informant
The problem with the second possibility is that during the 2016 Presidential campaign, the FBI and DOJ were controlled by very bad folks who literally committed treason to weaponize the intelligence apparatus against him. If they had criminal dirt on him, they would not have needed to risk hanging by the neck until dead to cobble together the FISA fiasco. It's not logical.
The only thorn in that idea.. is DId Trump find a find to give Mueller and Rodenstein a better deal and turn them against 'The Cabal'.. Rodenstein knew Cohn back from the McCarthy WITCH HUNT (sound familiar?) If so everything is a psyop that the Clintons/Rothschild's didnt see coming..and the only real question after that is.. Will Trump give back the presidency or will he start a Borgiastic Dynasty that wont make the same greedy mistakes that the last couple of Dynasties made..
Roger Clinton abnd Hillary Clinton knew the Gambino's very well.. I've always thrown a jaundiced eye over the idea that.. the Pizzagate distribution system (ie use parlours to distribute product) seem so similiar to the PIzza Connection case of New York in the 80's..(yes Rudy was in the thick of that making his name, grinding his teeth.. on RICO laws..)
Will Trump give back the presidency or will he start a Borgiastic Dynasty that wont make the same greedy mistakes that the last couple of Dynasties made..
Yep, this is indeed the question. Power can corrupt anyone who wields it too long and without sufficient scrutiny and we must keep an eagle eye out to make sure that doesn't happen. We are the media, now.
Did you by chance watch the videos by Steve Piesczenik about how Trump got into power? Where he comes straight out and says that a group of whitehats in the military and alphabet agencies would not allow the corrupt Clinton to take the reins of government even if Trump lost the election?
Trump did not win the presidency on his own. He had help from the inside pulling off that miracle against the MSM and Clinton cabal. I highly doubt those folks would allow him to overthrow the Constitution. Nor would his supporters, who are united in their love of our founding principles. It would destroy the brand he is so proud of forever and leave his kids a legacy of shame.
No, I think logically, he wants the glory of being right up there with George Washington on Mt. Rushmore. That's what fits his life story. He can't achieve that as a tyrant.
view the rest of the comments →
Kahlypso79 ago
2 things. . . Acosta when he made the sweetheart deal.. may have only had that option to get Epstein into court. There was no real way to make most of the charges stick due to law jurisdictions and rules and blah-blah's and a whole load of bullshit put in place to benefit rich criminals. IE.. no conviction, aquittement and impossiblity to get tried AGAIN for the same crimes. (again.. Ricjh criminals putting backdoors and loopholes in place to assure they dont go to prison..) 2nd thing.. Trump has been against human trafficking since the start. With Acosta's well known role in the 'deal', is it compatible that he would get into Trump's cabinet? Keeping enemies closer? Or hiding your hand until it's time to testify... (how do you get evidence accepted?) So hard to be sure what's happening anymore..
Vindicator ago
Yep. This is why I am tracking it closely. It makes no sense. Check out this recent piece by Imperator Rex (who was forced off Twitter for debunking the Russian collusion farce over a year ago and has since been proven right):
He notes the long-standing pattern of the MSM trying (and failing) to tie Trump to criminals: https://quodverum.com/2019/03/75/endgame-potus-trump-s-vindication-nears.html
Here's video of Trump testifying before Congress in 1993 about the mob: https://twitter.com/JFNYC1/status/1113423492077301761
You'd think with all of these claims, they would have been able to make at least one criminal claim stick over the years. In my opinion, it basically leaves two possibilities:
The problem with the second possibility is that during the 2016 Presidential campaign, the FBI and DOJ were controlled by very bad folks who literally committed treason to weaponize the intelligence apparatus against him. If they had criminal dirt on him, they would not have needed to risk hanging by the neck until dead to cobble together the FISA fiasco. It's not logical.
Kahlypso79 ago
The only thorn in that idea.. is DId Trump find a find to give Mueller and Rodenstein a better deal and turn them against 'The Cabal'.. Rodenstein knew Cohn back from the McCarthy WITCH HUNT (sound familiar?) If so everything is a psyop that the Clintons/Rothschild's didnt see coming..and the only real question after that is.. Will Trump give back the presidency or will he start a Borgiastic Dynasty that wont make the same greedy mistakes that the last couple of Dynasties made..
Roger Clinton abnd Hillary Clinton knew the Gambino's very well.. I've always thrown a jaundiced eye over the idea that.. the Pizzagate distribution system (ie use parlours to distribute product) seem so similiar to the PIzza Connection case of New York in the 80's..(yes Rudy was in the thick of that making his name, grinding his teeth.. on RICO laws..)
Vindicator ago
Yep, this is indeed the question. Power can corrupt anyone who wields it too long and without sufficient scrutiny and we must keep an eagle eye out to make sure that doesn't happen. We are the media, now.
Did you by chance watch the videos by Steve Piesczenik about how Trump got into power? Where he comes straight out and says that a group of whitehats in the military and alphabet agencies would not allow the corrupt Clinton to take the reins of government even if Trump lost the election?
Trump did not win the presidency on his own. He had help from the inside pulling off that miracle against the MSM and Clinton cabal. I highly doubt those folks would allow him to overthrow the Constitution. Nor would his supporters, who are united in their love of our founding principles. It would destroy the brand he is so proud of forever and leave his kids a legacy of shame.
No, I think logically, he wants the glory of being right up there with George Washington on Mt. Rushmore. That's what fits his life story. He can't achieve that as a tyrant.