This is the original link to my question on Quora:
"What is the LGBTQ+ community's moral reasoning behind their supposed rejection of pedophilia, and how does that same reasoning not apply to themselves?"
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-LGBTQ-communitys-moral-reasoning-behind-their-supposed-rejection-of-pedophilia-and-how-does-that-same-reasoning-not-apply-to-themselves
Here are some responses I received:
This question is mind bogglingly offensive.
Pedophillia is a criminal activity that involves a person who cannot give consent. All I know condemn it.
Consensual sex between consenting adults is not illegal in western countries.
Being true to one’s inborn sense of themselves and doing gender differently than expected is not a crime.
Consent is the difference.
Just in case you don't understand what pedophilia actually is, its sexual feelings towards children. CHILDREN!!
My question to you is why would you think someone in the LGBTQ community would accept someone like that?
>Only a pedophile would support and accept other pedophiles.
Children can't consent. Adults can. Therefore any sex involving a child is inherently rape, while the same is not true of sex involving only adults.
>If you can't understand this, you are the one with a problem.
Unsurprisingly, so far, I have not received any answer that articulates a strong rational basis for their rejection of pedophilia; most of them are emotionally-charged non-arguments laced with veiled ad hominems.
From all that I've seen from them so far, the LGBTQ+ community is a political movement, not really having anything to do with sexual orientation compared to their emphasis on political orientation. And with the lack of clarity of their moral stance, at least the Roman Catholic church has their moral doctrines plain and accessible so we can see how hypocritical and evil the Vatican really is.
Among the LGBTQ+ community's goals right now is to hide their inverted satanic morality from the general public as they continue to include more "minor-attracted persons," like a live frog in a boiling pan.
So when they say "we REJECT pedophilia," don't think it's all hunk-dory now and stop there; at that point, they're basically saying, "pay no attention to the man behind the curtain." Keep picking their brain and seek to understand what they really believe and expose it to the whole world.
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
@Sitnikoff, what does this have to do with the abuse of kids by the global elite? Please review the definition of pizzagate linked in the sidebar under Rule 1, and edit your post by this time tomorrow. How exactly does this help us bust elite child traffickers? It seems like it designed to stir drama and discredit the mountains of research we've amassed here.
Sitnikoff ago
I edited the most with more elaboration on the connection to the global elite. Is there anything else I should add?
Vindicator ago
This is what you added, correct?
While I agree with the premise, you haven't actually supported it with any linked evidence. You need to show the facts that convinced you, not just say you are convinced. Maybe links to previous threads showing the gay movement trying to lower the age of consent.
If that is too much trouble, you can always post theory submissions in v/pizzagatewhatever. You've still got 24 hours to add to this before we have to remove it.
Sitnikoff ago
I edited further, including more links and possible leads for people to look more into.
Vindicator ago
MUUUUCH better! I can remove the flair now.