Thanks for posting about Bill Maher, @gamepwn. :-)
Question: Has Q ever called out a pedo that we didn't research here before? There are a bunch of v/pizzagate posts about Bill Maher, as early as 2017.
To me, it seems he is only recycling old Pizzagate research, which is fine to an extent, as it spreads some awareness, but I'd really LOVE to see him expose pedos that were not already discussed here.
Question: Has Q ever called out a pedo that we didn't research here before?
Yes. Q dropped the Anderson Cooper pictures that led to anons here and on 8chan to link our research into the Tony Podesta artist that paints the dead kids to the Biltmore hotel pool.
Also...
Everything on this board started with the Podesta emails leaked to Wikileaks. Steve Piescenik said in November or December 2016 a group of whitehats, including Assange are responsible for helping Donald Trump stop Clinton and the deepstate from completely overthrowing the Constitution. FBIAnon leaked the pedo symbols on the FBI Record Vault for us. A year later, Q showed up and said a group of whitehats are helping Trump overthrow the globalist cabal, and he was going to be giving crumbs to provide as much transparency as possible.
You can believe that's all a BS psyop and it's just spy vs. spy.
But it's somewhat of a stretch to think there are two totally different groups of whitehats working with Trump to drain the swamp. I'd bet a substantial sum of money that the group Piesczenik referred to and the Q team are one and the same. We're here because of the pre-election leaks that started that effort.
You can believe that's all a BS psyop and it's just spy vs. spy.
Well, yes, I think it is a psy-op, as you know. I don't think Trump is draining the swamp in an universal sense, otherwise Q would attack Republican pedos as well.
'Draining the swamp' here only means that one deep state faction is trying to take out the other one, imo.
I've really gotten tired of Q.
Imo what happened was that one guy in the GOP (forgot the name, unfortunately) called out Hillary for having had Alinsky as a mentor - he mentioned that Alinsky dedicated his 'Rules for radicals' to Lucifer. There was a big uproar (that was in June or July 2016 IIRC).
I think this was when they got the idea they might want to take this further, and expose HRC and buddies, and use it for winning the elections.
Q/Trump isn't hurting any Republican pedos, like he never hurt Jeffrey Epstein, before a father complained, and like he made Acosta Secretary of Labour, although he was involved in giving Epstein the lenient plea deal.
Well, Trump made Jeb into a laughingstock, and Q has repeatedly said the two-party system is an illusion and that many on both sides are compromised. And arrests of human traffickers have gone up exponentially under Trump. As far as Acosta goes, there's a good chance Trump put him in charge of human trafficking to turn up the heat on what went down with Epstein. That certainly fits Trump's past modus operendi.
Republican voters became highly displeased with most of their elected officials under Bush, and they sent many of them packing. A lot of non-politicians inspired by Sarah Palin and the Tea Party ran for office during Obama era. I'd bet there are fewer pedos in office now than you think. Also, Republican leader types and constituents both tend to be big on guns. Have you ever heard of a pedo who was a Second Amendment proponent (who wasn't a Muslim radical or in a Mexican drug gang)?
view the rest of the comments →
think- ago
Thanks for posting about Bill Maher, @gamepwn. :-)
Question: Has Q ever called out a pedo that we didn't research here before? There are a bunch of v/pizzagate posts about Bill Maher, as early as 2017.
To me, it seems he is only recycling old Pizzagate research, which is fine to an extent, as it spreads some awareness, but I'd really LOVE to see him expose pedos that were not already discussed here.
Or did I miss something?
Vindicator ago
Yes. Q dropped the Anderson Cooper pictures that led to anons here and on 8chan to link our research into the Tony Podesta artist that paints the dead kids to the Biltmore hotel pool.
Also...
Everything on this board started with the Podesta emails leaked to Wikileaks. Steve Piescenik said in November or December 2016 a group of whitehats, including Assange are responsible for helping Donald Trump stop Clinton and the deepstate from completely overthrowing the Constitution. FBIAnon leaked the pedo symbols on the FBI Record Vault for us. A year later, Q showed up and said a group of whitehats are helping Trump overthrow the globalist cabal, and he was going to be giving crumbs to provide as much transparency as possible.
You can believe that's all a BS psyop and it's just spy vs. spy.
But it's somewhat of a stretch to think there are two totally different groups of whitehats working with Trump to drain the swamp. I'd bet a substantial sum of money that the group Piesczenik referred to and the Q team are one and the same. We're here because of the pre-election leaks that started that effort.
think- ago
Well, yes, I think it is a psy-op, as you know. I don't think Trump is draining the swamp in an universal sense, otherwise Q would attack Republican pedos as well.
'Draining the swamp' here only means that one deep state faction is trying to take out the other one, imo.
I've really gotten tired of Q.
Imo what happened was that one guy in the GOP (forgot the name, unfortunately) called out Hillary for having had Alinsky as a mentor - he mentioned that Alinsky dedicated his 'Rules for radicals' to Lucifer. There was a big uproar (that was in June or July 2016 IIRC).
I think this was when they got the idea they might want to take this further, and expose HRC and buddies, and use it for winning the elections.
Q/Trump isn't hurting any Republican pedos, like he never hurt Jeffrey Epstein, before a father complained, and like he made Acosta Secretary of Labour, although he was involved in giving Epstein the lenient plea deal.
Vindicator ago
Well, Trump made Jeb into a laughingstock, and Q has repeatedly said the two-party system is an illusion and that many on both sides are compromised. And arrests of human traffickers have gone up exponentially under Trump. As far as Acosta goes, there's a good chance Trump put him in charge of human trafficking to turn up the heat on what went down with Epstein. That certainly fits Trump's past modus operendi.
Q just commented about Acosta. He linked this tweet from the Associated Press and said,
Only time will tell.
think- ago
Well, then we have one Republican pedo. Since we know there must be more of them, why doesn't he call out the other ones?
Vindicator ago
Do we know of other Republicans in power who are pedos/pedo protectors?
think- ago
Well, this is why I said Q should tell us.
We know the statistics, how many males are into child rape, and we know there were Republicans involved in child rape in the Reagan and Bush area.
So there must still be some around.
Vindicator ago
Republican voters became highly displeased with most of their elected officials under Bush, and they sent many of them packing. A lot of non-politicians inspired by Sarah Palin and the Tea Party ran for office during Obama era. I'd bet there are fewer pedos in office now than you think. Also, Republican leader types and constituents both tend to be big on guns. Have you ever heard of a pedo who was a Second Amendment proponent (who wasn't a Muslim radical or in a Mexican drug gang)?