Here is the full thread containing her research. Most of which I find to be a stretch at best. The video @(8:39) she uses as proof that he is OTO is pretty weak. A baby reflected in his sunglasses in the Brock pic? That's just retarded. A halloween picture? The rest of it is just her playing word games and a post of a tarot card he made on instagram. She is into crystals, clairvoyance and natural healing using tinctures. All of which mean that the same argument she leveraged against Kappy could then reasonably be applied to her according to that logic. OMG she's a witch! That's just dumb.
I think a lot of people with good intentions make connections via assumptions that don't really hold up under scrutiny. Other people then spread these conclusions as fact and the whole thing devolves into parties from one personality camp attacking people in another camp and accusing them of being shills. I think a huge part of the problem in discovering the truth to all this shit is that people seem to choose one person to be a standard bearer for truth and then support them no matter what evidence is presented.
Is it possible that Kappy is or was in OTO? Absolutely. Are there red flags present? Yes, as evidenced by @letsdothis3. Does any of this definitively prove that Kappy is anything other than what he says? I don't believe it does. Being related to people who have connections to other people who are shady as fuck is not definitive proof that the person in question is implicitly involved in said shady activities. I am not going completely discount someone because there are red flags around them. There are red flags around literally everyone when it comes to this subject. That is why it is important to pay attention to who (of these public figures) is attacking who, when and about what.
It's also ok to disagree about these people. Noone has the complete picture and we are all seeing this from our own perspective which means we all have blind spots.
I think a huge part of the problem in discovering the truth to all this shit is that people seem to choose one person to be a standard bearer for truth and then support them no matter what evidence is presented.
This is so very, very true.
We also need to realize that if/when these occult groups start to be exposed and dismantled, there are going to be people who come forward to give information -- people who were not free to do so in the past. We are idiots if we lynch them when they speak up, just because they were involved. By definition, a whistleblower was part of something bad at one point. We need to ask tough questions, but we also need to weigh testimony wisely and examine whether a person's contributions are overall good or destructive.
view the rest of the comments →
dreamwarrior23 ago
I think he's controlled op, just like CDAN, but they still provide the same amount of truth as guys like Janda, Stone, Corsi, etc.
kazza64 ago
someone just told me he's OTO
think- ago
Kappy is OTO?! Who told you - would love to look into this. Would you maybe have a link? Thanks!
@Vindicator @EricKaliberhall @SandHog @MolochHunter @letsdothis3
Imnotshocked ago
https://twitter.com/sacred_smoke/status/1062366907842605056?s=20
SandHog ago
Here is the full thread containing her research. Most of which I find to be a stretch at best. The video @(8:39) she uses as proof that he is OTO is pretty weak. A baby reflected in his sunglasses in the Brock pic? That's just retarded. A halloween picture? The rest of it is just her playing word games and a post of a tarot card he made on instagram. She is into crystals, clairvoyance and natural healing using tinctures. All of which mean that the same argument she leveraged against Kappy could then reasonably be applied to her according to that logic. OMG she's a witch! That's just dumb.
I think a lot of people with good intentions make connections via assumptions that don't really hold up under scrutiny. Other people then spread these conclusions as fact and the whole thing devolves into parties from one personality camp attacking people in another camp and accusing them of being shills. I think a huge part of the problem in discovering the truth to all this shit is that people seem to choose one person to be a standard bearer for truth and then support them no matter what evidence is presented.
Is it possible that Kappy is or was in OTO? Absolutely. Are there red flags present? Yes, as evidenced by @letsdothis3. Does any of this definitively prove that Kappy is anything other than what he says? I don't believe it does. Being related to people who have connections to other people who are shady as fuck is not definitive proof that the person in question is implicitly involved in said shady activities. I am not going completely discount someone because there are red flags around them. There are red flags around literally everyone when it comes to this subject. That is why it is important to pay attention to who (of these public figures) is attacking who, when and about what.
It's also ok to disagree about these people. Noone has the complete picture and we are all seeing this from our own perspective which means we all have blind spots.
@think-
Vindicator ago
This is so very, very true.
We also need to realize that if/when these occult groups start to be exposed and dismantled, there are going to be people who come forward to give information -- people who were not free to do so in the past. We are idiots if we lynch them when they speak up, just because they were involved. By definition, a whistleblower was part of something bad at one point. We need to ask tough questions, but we also need to weigh testimony wisely and examine whether a person's contributions are overall good or destructive.
truthdemon ago
Yeah but a millstone would still be waiting for them connected to a sugar mill