CROWDER NAILS IT! Must watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azqKAZr7rwA
Presidential candidate Kamala Harris is pushing single payer health care for her Presidential run platform. The same week she announces this in Iowa, New York passed a FULL TERM abortion law. Other states are following suit. California has already passed a mandatory vaccine law. From previous posts we learned that Vaccines can and do cause autism. "Vaccines might cause autism after all experts says" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kG3EmYhTy1g
"New CDC Statistics: 1 out of every 36 Children in the U.S. has Autism" https://healthimpactnews.com/2017/new-cdc-statistics-1-out-of-every-36-children-in-the-u-s-has-autism/
Under single payer (the Government) these two extreme laws could be forced on ALL STATES. Here's my theory: forced vaccination - increased autism - "neonatal test for autism" developed - mothers told to abort these babies, but carry them to term to harvest body parts = POPULATION REDUCTION + MONETIZED full term body parts harvesting = huge profit increase with NATIONWIDE FORCED full vaccination plus vaccine safety COVERUP!
PIZZAGATE RELATED: Full term abortion would LEGALIZE SRA. Then body parts harvested.
RELATED LINK:
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/3004706
view the rest of the comments →
think- ago
No, it wouldn't 'legalize' Satanic Ritual Abuse like you say in your OP. It would only make it easier to obtain babies for these rituals. Which would be terrible enough.
septimasexta ago
If they have their own people "deliver" the baby, it would be impossible to prove "murder" if caught. Aborted babies are routinely cut up for tissue and parts at abortion clinic. Under the New York law, midwives and "health workers" can be trained and licensed to do full term abortions. Only one person involved instead of the previous 3 doctors.
think- ago
Yes. But this doesn't mean that SRA is legalized.
Vindicator ago
That all depends on the intention of those who made the laws, who own and fund the abortion clinics and perform the abortions, if Marina Abramovich is to be believed. Remember, she said:
That statement could logically be written as "The intention, the context for what is made, and where it is made defines what is occult."
@septimasexta
think- ago
It's still not legal to perform satanic rituals, and kill babies for that purpose.
Vindicator ago
What? Of course it's legal to perform satanic rituals.
And it's legal for a Satanist to run an abortion factory.
think- ago
Satinic rituals: Yes. But OP talked about SRA = Satanic Ritual Abuse. Torturing children, and murder them for ritual purposes is not allowed.
Example: When someone gets a prescription from a doctor for cannabis, they will be able to legally obtain it.
But when a doctor prescribes cannabis to someone, and he does this as a personal favour for someone who wants to take it just for fun, it's illegal.
Vindicator ago
Yes. The point @septimasexta was making is that the combination of factors he outlined, including abortion at birth, would create opportunities for conducting SRA under the law. I think it's a bit naive to think that any agency would prosecute an abortionist or Planned Parenthood CEO arguing they were convincing women to abort their kids because they have evidence their intentions were wrong because they are card-carrying Satanists.
In my state, this used to be the case. But enough people got used to using it medically that proponents were able to change the law so now any adult can buy it for any reason they want...which is exactly what septima's point is. These initiatives constitute a slippery slope -- that ends in legal SRA.
think- ago
Agree.
Well, we haven't reached that point yet. As you say, the law had to be changed to make it legal for everyone.
= Currently it isn't legal.
That's not the point. OP said it was legal, but it isn't. That it would be difficult to prosecute it, or law enforcement might be hesitant to prosecute it, is a totally different matter.
septimasexta ago
It would require a court case to decide. So, IT'S LEGAL until proven otherwise by a jury.
think- ago
I think we'll have to agree to disagree on that.
septimasexta ago
Proof that the law is "grey." Proof that it would be settled in court on a case by case basis. I remember when sodomy was against the law. Other courts said it is legal. Regardless, individuals were still practicing it. I STAND MY GROUND.