I would like to address an interesting thing about advertisement of children on social media... I have looked at a lot of content on Instagram and found that people who are advertising children seem to hold them in a strange way with both hands. Usually children are posed by themselves but suspected child trafickers like Rachel Chandler hold babies weird in photos. They are not happy pictures of children, they look strange.
Brooke Shields is somewhat of an interesting case. She posed nude in Playboy at about 10 or 11. These images are available uncensored in Google image search. They definitely fall under "exploitative". Why was Brooke Shields promoted so explicitly and publicly?
Do these pictures denote a transaction? Notice the placement of the hands.
https://imgur.com/a/FpKaJ34
view the rest of the comments →
NOMOCHOMO ago
Dude....It may be apophenia but I see a code(s) in the text of the New York Mag headline (2nd imgur photo)
"THE CIA CONNECTION AT CBS"
+
"Where you can BUY A BROWNSTONE for $20,000"
CIA sex blackmail programs are called "brownstone" operations
https://steemit.com/pizzagate/@rebelskum/what-is-operation-brownstone-a-brownstone-operation-is-it-real-more-than-likely
@rebelskum wrote about them
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5p6zh4/operation_brownstone_and_operation_brownstar_cias/
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
I think it's a made up cover and never actually published. The whole cover reads like parody. Tried to look it up, no luck.
NOMOCHOMO ago
I dont know about that. Here's a page from 2015 (pre pizzagate), citing it in a non-judgemental manner
http://www.holtuncensored.com/hu/2015/06/
(Photo at the bottom)
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Thanks, I still can't find the original mag cover or article, but that is not unusual as I stink at digging, it just seems kinda hinky.
NOMOCHOMO ago
Totally agree, I'm looking as well
I found an earlier blog from 2009 citing it along with many other troubling aspects of brooke shields' career
http://pseudoccultmedia.blogspot.com/2009/10/brooke-shields-doll-and-tate-modern.html?m=1
I think whoever posted it scanned a copy from a physical San Francisco library archive, it may not be "published" on the internet
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Interesting, thanks, again.
NOMOCHOMO ago
I owe you way more thanks for your archiving work. For the last 2 weeks archive.org and archive.is dont work for me. (I find it curious, but it forces me to archive things on my system)
Here is a 2012 article with the same photo
https://www.wedreamoficecream.com/blog/2012/05/07/201257seduced-by-a-real-life-lolita-brooke-shields-html
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
It has made me miserable for about 3 mos. now.
I agree, thank you for digging and you're welcome for archiving.