Alum of Seattle Jesuit high school home to 17 pedophile priests since the 1930s was US Attorney fired by Bush -- commended by Comey, links to failure to prosecute voter fraud (pizzagate)

submitted ago by Vindicator

Jesuits West just released their list of 111 priests credibly accused of sex crimes against children:

See Nomochomo's post: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2901202

Well, I looked through the names on the list (pdf link!) and did a little cross referencing.

First, I noticed a pattern of priests starting out teaching in urban high schools in major cities prior to the dates of reported sexual abuse. In most of the cases, though the years of abuse coincide with posts in Alaska, or other podunk locales. Mostly Alaska.

While it is plausible that it took years of CP viewing and grooming kids before these pedos became confident enough to actually commit rape, it's somewhat hard to believe that these criminals only acted out once they got to the hinterlands. Perhaps wealthier, urban families of victims were more reluctant to report or didn't believe their kids?

Or, maybe this is a controlled release of information. In any case, the pattern is intereting.

I also noticed that compared to California and Oregon, there were very, very few mentions of Seattle area Jesuit high schools -- only one, really: Seattle Prep/Matteo Ricci. Which had 17 of the 111 over the years: Mark Falvey, Joseph Balfey, Francis Burris, Robert Corrigal, Francis Duffy, Harold Ernsdorff, John Fox, Harold Greif, Bernard Harris, James Hurley, John Hurley, Gordon Keys, David King, Edmund Robinson, Charles Saalfeld, John Coughlin, and Gary Ulenkhott.

Under the premise that pizzagate is largely an effort to gain control of people in power through the leverage of child rape, I decided to look up notable Seattle Prep alumni to see what might be found. Low and behold, there is a link to a questionable firing of a US Attorney John McKay by the Bush Administration:

McKay was appointed United States Attorney by President George W. Bush in October 2001. He had received a positive evaluation seven months before he was dismissed. Among his noteworthy achievements the successful prosecution of terrorist Ahmed Ressam. Deputy Attorney General James B. Comey gave McKay the additional responsibility of overseeing a pilot program for a computer system (called Law Enforcement Information Exchange) for his success he earned the United States Navy's highest civilian honor.[1]

The Seattle Times noted in February 2007, "One of the most persistent rumors in Seattle legal circles is that the Justice Department forced McKay, a Republican, to resign to appease Washington State Republicans angry over the 2004 governor's race. Some believe McKay's dismissal was retribution for his failure to convene a federal grand jury to investigate allegations of voter fraud in the race."[2]

Was McKay a victim of pedophiles at Seattle Prep -- and that history used as leverage to get him to stand down on voter fraud investigation?

We need more digging here!

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Are_we_sure ago

Was McKay a victim of pedophiles at Seattle Prep -- and that history used as leverage to get him to stand down on voter fraud investigation?

You're making a pretty big leap here are you not? It seems like you are making several.

  1. That McKay was abused at Seattle Prep.....Do you have any idea how unlikely this is? Even in a school with offending teachers, it would still be a small number of victims.

  2. That the pedophiles who abused him at a concern about a voter fraud case decades later?Or did somebody else learn of this history and use it as leverage?

  3. That he did stand down on a voter fraud case.

And this seems to be around the time of the US Attorneys Scandal in the Bush WhiteHouse.

Yup. This was smack dab in the middle of the US Attorney's Scandal. McKay wrote an article about this is 2017

The Bush administration fired me from the Justice Department over politics

As one of the nine US attorneys fired for political reasons in 2006 and 2007, I was an unwilling participant in what was, until now, the biggest scandal to shake the Justice Department since the "Saturday Night Massacre" firings during Watergate more than 40 years ago.

The US attorneys episode, which clouded President George W. Bush’s second term, revealed just how explosive it can be to violate norms that insulate criminal investigation and prosecution from politics. Eventually, almost everyone who took part in the decision — and then attempted to cover it up — lost their jobs and reputations. Unfortunately, the Trump administration seems to have forgotten those lessons in firing Comey.

For those who may have forgotten, or are too young to remember, the scandal began when the Bush administration unexpectedly asked for the resignations of nine US attorneys in 2006, a move that erupted into scandal in early 2007. The custom had long been that US attorneys, who are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate, submit their resignations only when a new president takes office. That norm exists so administrations aren’t tempted to punish and reward federal attorneys for politically motivated work.

Ideologues in the Bush administration were unhappy with that tradition, and targeted attorneys for various decisions that, in their view, had hurt Republicans. They also hoped to take advantage of a loophole in the Patriot Act that allowed the attorney general, rather than the president, to appoint interim US attorneys, thereby bypassing Senate confirmation.