You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Conway ago

Hmm, Be multi-millionaire, 16 year olds pretending to be 18 constantly send nudes in hope of getting your millions... Be 18 in high school, freshmen girls constantly sending you nudes in hopes of getting paid...

It sounds good in theory but, practice maybe a little ruff. Could this be specifically for bill clinton and the podesta bros?

MolochHunter ago

i think the law only applies to the PRODUCERS, not the consumers, of child pornography

Conway ago

So your gonna have 16 year old girls, borrowing phones and sneaking a boob selfie as a way of extorting money out of people.

Think of it like slip and fall negligence laws before cameras where everywhere. They are good in theory keeps the store owners on the ball shoveling snow and cleaning up spills, gives them incentive to do so. The reality of it was, people would slip and hurt themselves on purpose just to sue the store..

3141592653 ago

You're worrying about all the wrong things. Suspicious...

Conway ago

Just seeing yet another avenue of revenue women can extort from men. Child support, alimony, marriage, now stuff like this and lets not forget California and it's mandated women on boards of directors..

MolochHunter ago

no, if the 16 yr old did that then THEY would be subject to a conviction of producing/trafficking child pornography

this law applies to those who make money off child pornography, not those who have spent money on child pornography

so a minor 'exploiting themselves' would be exempt from this law because technically as both the perp and the victim theyd be compensating themselves !

Conway ago

This has happened before, Girlfriend, takes pictures of self on boyfriends phone, boyfriend gets in trouble. Its her word vs his, If she did it, she is guilty of manufacturing child porn, if he did it, he is guilty of manufacturing child porn. Who does the court believe?

MolochHunter ago

the boyfriend shouldnt have a girlfriend of that age to start with, so theres more than child pornography to account for there

Conway ago

Meh, 17 16, he turns 18.. Be real..

MolochHunter ago

im certain a court would take that into account

Rawrination ago

You are naive and trusting. The courts are only there to protect our owners. If there is a way they can screw over a common person they will. Doubly so if it's a white male.