Part 1: A Sex Pyramid Scheme https://archive.is/sYB96
Now, more than a decade later, two unrelated civil lawsuits — one set for trial on Dec. 4 — could reveal more about Epstein’s crimes. The Dec. 4 case, in Palm Beach County state court, involves Epstein and Edwards, whom Epstein had accused of legal misdeeds in representing several victims. The case is noteworthy because it will mark the first time that Epstein’s victims will have their day in court, and several of them are scheduled to testify.
Jena-Lisa Jones, with her 18-month-old son, Raymond, says she was 14 when she was introduced to Jeffrey Epstein and was paid $200 by him to give him a massage at his home. Jones says Epstein told her to take off all of her clothes and that he fondled her during the massage.
A second lawsuit, known as the federal Crime Victims’ Rights suit, is still pending in South Florida after a decade of legal jousting. It seeks to invalidate the non-prosecution agreement in hopes of sending Epstein to federal prison. Wild, who has never spoken publicly until now, is Jane Doe No. 1 in “Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 vs. the United States of America,” a federal lawsuit that alleges Epstein’s federal non-prosecution agreement was illegal.
Part 2: Undermining the Case https://archive.is/uqIzG
Part 3: Another Kind of Justice https://archive.is/soTKF
Epstein's Connections https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article221897990.html Archive: https://archive.is/Cayww
The Timeline https://archive.is/D75PZ
view the rest of the comments →
think- ago
Acosta is an asshole. It makes me sick to think that he got his position as a Secretary of Labour as reward for what he did for Epstein.
gogogogostop ago
Looks like Trump is going to use Acosta like he used Rosenstein and Mueller. Let him get his neck deep in the trap.
think- ago
Elaborate?
gogogogostop ago
Maybe I'm being too hopeful. I should have said "might be" instead of "is".
Trump specifically used both Rosenstein and Mueller (and Sessions) for optics in order to keep the Dems thinking they had some control over the investigation, and played these guys like chess pieces to turn things in his favor.
With Acosta, I suspect that Trump is using him for optics as well, and probably something more is behind it too. He would have known about Acosta's part in Epstein's plea deal as well as the illegalities of that deal before he selected Acosta as his Labor Secretary. I feel quite certain that every move that Trump makes has been carefully planned out beforehand. Nothing is being done without good reason. I don't think he picked Acosta on a whim.
With that said, it's really just a question of how Acosta's position as Labor Secretary might be useful to Trump? I don't know much about politics, but I know that Acosta is responsible for labor issues, which includes issues relating to human trafficking, which is a big ticket item on Trump's fix-it list. At this point we can only speculate on how that might work into Trump's plans, but consider the fact that Acosta is a Deep State player, based on how he helped Epstein out with an illegal deal. He was working under Mueller when he made that deal with Epstein, so Mueller is implicated in that as well. Acosta is working for the Deep State, so he might be managing some illegal things for them in the Labor Dept., like covering up human trafficking issues involving certain businesses, etc. These issues will be coming up as Trump moves forward and starts investigations into that as part of his agenda.
Who really knows, but the probability is very high that there's a good reason why Trump put him where he is. Trump doesn't do things without a good reason.