Former SCOTUS Justice Anthony Kennedy Called Virtual Child Porn 'Free Speech' (pizzagate)

submitted ago by Oh_Well_ian

Supreme Court Strikes Down Ban on Virtual Child Pornography

'"The sexual abuse of a child is a most serious crime and an act repugnant to the moral instincts of a decent people," Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote in the majority decision. Nevertheless, he said, if the 1996 law were allowed to stand, the Constitution's First Amendment right to free speech would be "turned upside down. Congress may pass valid laws to protect children from abuse, and it has," Justice Kennedy wrote. "The prospect of crime, however, by itself does not justify laws suppressing protected speech."'

Although it is 'old news', this decision by the SCOTUS was pivotal and condoned the RIGHT of pedophiles to proliferate the internet with virtual child porn, which everybody knows is just one step from child porn made with real children.

Per Q, Anthony Kennedy was forced out of the SCOTUS, opening the door for another TRUMP appointment. This was a YUGE Swamp Takedown.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

dianemdeath ago

Reminder, SCOTUS interprets the law. They do not make the law. So in order to make child porn illegal, the legislative branch must make a law specifically against the making of child porn. You'd think this is a no-brainer but still, child porn is readily available to those who seek it. So we the people need to push specific laws through Congress to make child porn equal to "yelling fire in a crowded theater." Equally, I remember in the '90s, parents who took pictures of their naked children in a tub or on a bearskin rug where being prosecuted for child porn because the pictures were developed at the local kiosk and other film development places. Food for thought.

Atomized_Individual ago

Humans are witch hunt prone

Oh_Well_ian ago

Humans are witch hunt averse.

There is a reason there is only one example in American history.

This is why Satanic Witch Killary has run amuck her entire evil life.

Atomized_Individual ago

No, people delude themselves into thinking if they get rid of a particular type of other people, everything will be fine. It's a mass psychosis that takes hold. Look at now. Look at history.

Oh_Well_ian ago

nahh.. how about you provide an example of a widescale witch hunt in this country?

I have 3 that the (((msm))) and Deep State used to cover up government involvement in the Pedocracy:

1 ) FRANKLIN SCANDAL

2 ) MCMARTIN PRESCHOOL

3 ) PIZZAGATE

Atomized_Individual ago

Pagan witch burnings, muslim invasions 1 & 2. The Soviets, the Nazis, Mao, Pol pot. Red Scare / McCarthy. Straight White Males. Jewtards. And now you (pedotard) people think people should go to.prison over drawings.

Oh_Well_ian ago

You're not describing witch hunts. You're describing genocides.

Your hero's Podesta and HRC are going to hang, you shitbag.

Atomized_Individual ago

I'm an Alt-Right Identitarian, pedotard. You people need to deal with your own past trauma, not imprison people for drawings.

Oh_Well_ian ago

You're an apologist for Anthony Kennedy who is a Deep State pedophile.

I get it... You're addicted to child porn anime and when you're not jacking off to it you Concern Troll v/pizzagate.

You stick out like Michael Obama.

Atomized_Individual ago

Get therapy for your issues. You pedotards wouldn't be able to identify the age of a non-existent character in a drawing anyway.

Oh_Well_ian ago

kid fucker ^^^

Atomized_Individual ago

No, I'm not your dad.

Oh_Well_ian ago

Sorry faggot...

Your gaslighting, concern trolling and projection are not going to save you from judgement before God.

Do you cunts really think you can hide behind your twisted words?

Atomized_Individual ago

Gods were created by people, religitard.

Oh_Well_ian ago

God gave you everything and you sent back that gift long, long ago.

sad little man

Atomized_Individual ago

There aren't any gods. They're made up, like the easter bunny.

Oh_Well_ian ago

These are all the lies you tell yourself to justify your degeneracy.

There is one God. There is no 'they'.

Atomized_Individual ago

You people can never prove that. It's all make believe.

maurice ago

People can not prove or disprove "god". Those that "disprove "god" relegate the concept into some form of pseudo human.

Which philosophical ideology of "god" do we first concede is the one that shall be the first and foremost "god" that science shall use to debate the concept?

What criteria do bias scientists decide upon to test their theory?

So far, historically, I personally have noticed any and all atheists seem dead set on only attacking Christendom.

This is the endless circle argument. Academia is filled with parrot egos that find it easier to write off what is actually a personal journey and try to make the subjective into an objective, when in fact, "god" can not be quantified and placed into intellectual boxes to scientifically examine it.

Atomized_Individual ago

I call ALL religions bullshit, snowflake. And there is NO proof of ANY gods. Period.

maurice ago

Pot calling the kettle a snowflake?

You're welcome to your opinion. That is all it is, your personal opinion, backed by zero peer evidence.

Atomized_Individual ago

I'm not making a claim, you are. Your claim is that your very specific god or gods exist. That's an unsupported claim.

maurice ago

Your claim is there is no "god", yet you can not define the criteria you are trying to test.

A circle argument. Burden of proof is upon you, not me.

Would you like the scientific peer articles on synchronicity and quantum intuition? Perhaps peer psychological articles on mindfulness and positive thinking?

All the science backing many of the core principles of PHILOSOPHICAL teachings of many historical figures. Not RELIGIOUS dogma. These two are very different.

Atomized_Individual ago

My claim is simply that: "there is no proof of gods", and by that I mean the figures people build churches, mosques, synagogues and temples to worship. My claim stands. There is NO PROOF of gods.

maurice ago

You statement then is there is no pseudo human beings with supernatural abilities. To that I will concur.

Atomized_Individual ago

Which gods have been proven?

maurice ago

Again, if your only definition of "god" is a physical human-like being, I'll admit, none.

If you bother reading eastern philosophies, the concept of "god" is more in tune with a type of energy force. A universal consciousness, so to speak.

Those philosophical understandings are being tested and people are trying to devise lab experimentation to test the concepts.

As I said, read into mindfulness, positive thinking, quantum intuition, synchronicity. You can find peer articles that discuss test performed on Buddhist monks to film what they refer to as chi. You can find many other articles out there delving into modern understandings of energy manipulation, focused intent, etc(FYI, focused intent is prayer).

I'm not trying to debate the existence of physical humans that can snap their fingers and preform magick. I do not believe in such. There is no proof. To date, all magick, is nothing more than manipulations of scientific principles.

I'll agree all day and night, there is no magick man in the sky that watches like a pervert, making judgments based on whether or not you touch yourself, when you're alone.

Atomized_Individual ago

You're almost there. Keep going.

maurice ago

I've other things to do, so I'll leave you with a song.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqR1cjuPXUg&index=19&list=RDAHukwv_VX9A

Atomized_Individual ago

I'm not a fan of song

dundundunnnnn ago

Jesus is GOD and he did live.

He died.

He lives again.

This is made evident through the examination of ancient non-Christian sources.

Lucian of Samosata

Babylonian Talmud

Josephus, a first century Jewish historian

Pliny the Younger

Jesus did live. The only thing up for questioning is his divinity. If a guy dies and rises from the dead, I believe that is divine. You may not.