You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

think- ago

The TL;DR is that they settled with the victim mentioned in the OP since they were afraid a further investigation could reveal that there had been other accusations as well.

Richard Scorer, of Slater and Gordon, representing alleged victims of Tolkien, told the hearing:

“It wasn’t settled because Archbishop Nichols wanted to ‘do the right thing’ by a victim of abuse. If you study the file, we suggest it is very plain that Mr Carrie’s claim, and those of other victims of John Tolkien, were settled for one reason and one reason alone – because in the absence of a settlement, the archdiocese would have been obliged to disclose that they had received a complaint, or possibly complaints in the plural, of sexual indecency by Father Tolkien in 1968.”

When more of Tolkien’s alleged victims contacted the church with civil claims in the early 2000s, after charges against him were dropped owing to ill health, Nichols, then the archbishop of Birmingham, told a lawyer acting on behalf of the diocese that he would “prefer not to disclose” the earlier complaint.

The inquiry heard that at least four other people made abuse allegations against Tolkien. It is understood that several civil claims over abuse committed by Tolkien have been settled by the church.

Source.

carmencita ago

As usual more sexual abuse of Our Children swept into the dust bin. They think it will never be found, or at least are hoping. No longer. We are exposing their cover ups, unfortunately some of these vile perpetrators have met their death. Is that the only way we can hope for safety of Our Children? Is that the only way that Victims can be assured that they will no longer brutally rape more Children again? May the High Level Clergy rot in hell. YES francis there is a hell and it's waiting for you. Hopefully sooner than later.

InnocentAngels ago

Off topic, but have you seen that Celine Dion has a gender neutral clothing line for kids? Another celebrity pushing their agenda. So disappointed.

carmencita ago

Not into her or her music, but not a bit surprised. So sad to have another person in the limelight getting this sick stuff out there. Really don't we have enough of this yet? Yuck.

InnocentAngels ago

I guess I was surprised to see her do it. I think she has a beautiful voice, but I'm not a huge fan of her style. She just didn't seem like the type to push it. Now she needs to stop being the diva she thinks she is and go gender neutral. Can you imagine that?

carmencita ago

Now I am wondering about her son. Did she have him naturally? Or is she another one of those that needed a beard? Never enough money. Now they are pushing her to do this garbage. She possibly has to do it in order to get more jobs. She is beyond loaded. Sick.

carmencita ago

Holy Cow. I had forgotten how many times she claimed to try. I always think that whatever they tells us about their families always has some lies in it. That's horrid about her Mother having so many Children. I don't like abortion, but that's not right either. Man.

InnocentAngels ago

She puts it all out there in this video. Pushing gender neutral identity, and how the world owns your children.A baby even has a tee on that says New Order. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=65&v=vSdSFKj-hOc

carmencita ago

Another Jolie and Madonna Mother Just what the world needs. She is either under their complete control or she is totally doing it for the money. This is so sad. Saw the tee. Scary. People hang on to your Children, Tight.

InnocentAngels ago

I would say she is controlled.. They don't get to the height she is without being their puppet. Terrible to think about how much control they are seeking. I hope I'll never see their New Order.

carmencita ago

Wonder where her son came from. Possibly stolen like Jolie and Madonna did. They don't have any morals. The fact that they are with the NWO, that's why they take other people's Children. They think they can take anything that belongs to us. That garbage all started with Hillary. It takes a village. And she did.

InnocentAngels ago

I wonder if there are pics of Celine pregnant. I'll have to look sometime. I wonder too if the child is really her biological child or adopted. I remember when Hillary said that. I bet they have been pushing it long before she made that statement though. What's funny about Madonna and Jolie is how they don't really want the fathers to have much to do with their children's life from what I have seen.

carmencita ago

Maybe because the men are not "in charge" so to speak of the nonsense with their new found feminism. It was odd that Brad took off I believe he did not like what she was doing with the children. Possibly they are not his anyway. It's all so screwed up. Just think of the wildest scenarios and that's probably the right answer. I saw on TV where Oprah interviewed Michelle O about her new book. She talked about her family's fertility problems I heard. Trying to fan the flames.

InnocentAngels ago

I would say that is a big part of it. Brad really got the bad end of the stick with her saying he was abusive to the kids. There was that about Rocco (Madonna and Guy Richie's son) wanting to live with his dad because of Madonna's treatment and lack of attention to him. No wonder so many celeb kids get so screwed up. I saw that about Michelle's book. Have we ever seen a pic of her pregnant? I don't know if that's true about the kids, but it makes you go hmm.

carmencita ago

I don't believe or disbelieve what is said about Malia and Sasha but I will say it is possible. There are many that have faked their pregnancies as well. I am sure she touched on that to kill all the rumors about the girls. Their lives are controlled and they seem like robots, follow the instructions.