Hey @Vindicator, is there a post I can look at that links Q to pizzagate/explains why it fits submission rules?
Seriously looking for info, I've seen a lot of good information from Q, but I don't understand how seemingly unsourced (or speculative: "vindication may be coming") claims relate to how ya'll define "pizzagate"
Thanks in advance, and sorry if this question offends anyone
Check the drops. It's mainly pics. I can recall at least 3 times. The last drop he did, the day before I had requested a PG drop to get new people up to date. This was on the old reddit board.
he won't answer you. he's a transparent gatekeeper Zio-shill trying to have PG, which is real, subsumed by Q, which is not. https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1905258
view the rest of the comments →
NOMOCHOMO ago
Hey @Vindicator, is there a post I can look at that links Q to pizzagate/explains why it fits submission rules?
Seriously looking for info, I've seen a lot of good information from Q, but I don't understand how seemingly unsourced (or speculative: "vindication may be coming") claims relate to how ya'll define "pizzagate"
Thanks in advance, and sorry if this question offends anyone
niggerfaggot1988 ago
Check the drops. It's mainly pics. I can recall at least 3 times. The last drop he did, the day before I had requested a PG drop to get new people up to date. This was on the old reddit board.
I like to think he read my post.
NOMOCHOMO ago
I've seen the pics/drops and there's some interesting/accurate stuff
But how does an anonymous source meet rule 2 of empiricism?
Its Pizzagate related, but it's like the NY Times quoting "unnamed officials within the administration"
I like to think a lot of things, but its not proof.
Not saying it doesn't exist, but I'm looking for an actual link? Or previous pizzagate post? Searchvoat doesn't let you search for "q"
SchlongKeyhote ago
he won't answer you. he's a transparent gatekeeper Zio-shill trying to have PG, which is real, subsumed by Q, which is not.
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1905258