You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Podge512 ago

Cc1914 ago

Are you saying because “Gawker” is in this post it’s not true? What do you make of these subs then?

Podge512 ago

I'm saying Gawker's concern for children is disingenuous because they're actually pro child rape as the article I provided amply demonstrates and are merely using the exploitation of Voat's freedom of speech/expression philosophy by paedophiles to post abhorrent, but not technically illegal, pictures of children (YouTube has the same problem; there are numerous videos of little girls doing gymnastics on that site which are indubitably ice cream for nonces, but aren't technically illegal or in violation of their ToS and thus cannot be removed but I'm not aware of any righteous indignation from Gawker regarding Elsagate or the aforementioned 'gymnastics' videos) as an excuse to attack this site. The subs referred to have been exposed and roundly condemned here in the past.

Cc1914 ago

So like back in the day when we use to expose pedophiles on the internet and we would search night and day looking for these degenerates and all we had to do was click on over to vjailbait and find thousands of them ?