I posted this in v/politics but I think this is really important and we need to follow what's happening here.
BIG problem happening right now. Transexualising children is having a HUGE push on twitter right now and they're using the hashtag #Butterfly and have made a TV show called Butterfly about transexual children. I'm sure most of you know what a butterfly and pre-pubescent children together means. They're using this tranny push to start the push for legalising paedophilia by getting these paedophilia symbols and child degeneracy into the public consciousness.
https://twitter.com/hashtag/Butterfly?src=tren
https://i.imgtc.com/JhkKas0.jpg
The shitty lib government is trying to pass a law that would allow minors to go through hormone therapy without their parent's permission.
Also, and totally coincidental I'm sure, the big UK VIP paedophile scandal, that included the ex (and now dead) Prime Minister Edward Heath that many were expecting to explode has just been re-covered up and one of the whistleblowing victims arrested. This scandal involves not only sexual abuse but also murder.
Inb4
getting paedophilia symbols and child degeneracy into the public consciousness does not directly mean paedophilia is being legalized or on the verge or being legalized.
Yeah, transexual 8 year old children leading fag marches isn't a sign of anything impending…. Note the sign "this is what FREEDOM looks like".
If a child can CONSENT and make decisions about their sexuality, it will probably already make baby raping legal without another law. If not, the precedent is already set and there will be (((no reason))) not to, as we've seen with every other fucking kike law in the US.
They cannot consent until 18 years for sexuality, they can't consent to sex changes before. Children cannot consent because they are too easily intimidated or manipulated into behaviors. Presuming that the majority of 'child transgenderism' is not a result of manipulation, this still leaves room for irreversible damage done to children who were manipulated. One will end up having to measure "victims" against each other. Which is worth more protection: the normal child that was intimidated into TRANS hormonal treatment, or the supposed TRANS that was disallowed sex hormone treatment? One must weigh also the economic cost, with transgender treatments working against the child's biology, however fascist or 'transphobic' one might call me for pointing this out. There is an economic argument to bolster the moral one of disallowance.
https://i.imgtc.com/iCjdxTS.png
One has to take the average behavior of children into consideration for the measurement of damage caused to them by adults; and one sees overwhelmingly that most children are normal - and there is nothing wrong with that, despite what resentment that causes. There are, let's presume, equal in proportion, parents who will force a transgender or prevent them from having surgery, as there are parents who will force, groom or manipulate a child into transgenderism. One of these are more expensive and it ruins the lives all the more for a victim within society. The normal kid which is groomed into sex change will suffer more greatly than a trans which cannot.
To the people who actually think this shit is normal. It blows my mind. How sub-human is the average fucking person?
You know what, I have no argument. Nothing that will prevent them from calling you "bigoted" and then you subsequently hiding away. You're going to have to deal with a government which allows any Jewish, Muslim, gay or transgender teacher, at any time, declaring your kid transgender and, if you don't comply with their 'treatment', then you lose your kid. That's on you. That's your choice. No one is going to see you as a 'victim' when you could have talked up about it now. No one is going to 'sympathize' when you're called a bigot daily. You didn't fight, you didn't care, you went in your little hovel and said "I don't care about the implications, I don't care about the consequences." You're the one that denied nature, the one that looked at the animal kingdom and said "I'm 30,000 leagues above that" while denying the very thing you see as true.
You can't even protect kids, that's how pathetic to this supposed 'morality' of liberalism you've become. YOU refuse to look at possible bad actors in high positions of power. YOU refuse to see the possible 'bad' in a conglomerate of media. YOU are confused how idiots could have so much power, while never considering their possible moral depravity. YOU let it continue while, when you actually start caring, you look around like lost sheep wondering how it could be happening. YOU defend your naivety with the same fervor with which they enforce yours and wipe your hands of it thereby.
The Jews really managed to kill off the best of our stock with the World Wars. Today's world is of a fully judified spirit, and the last great resistance to it died in 1945.
view the rest of the comments →
Mommyplayer571 ago
So sick. I really hate that transgender thing in kids. They just want to “belong” and join any group that will have them. Likely adults too on that.
siegnagel ago
Kids will do mostly what pleases their parents. I know a woman who has virtually groomed her little boys into being homosexual. She took a normal little boy who was into wrestling, transformers and so on took him to pride parades, getting his nails painted and so on. Her background picture on FB is now her 10 year old son with the caption 'the only gay in the village'. I said something about it, (I know her IRL) and I roasted by her liberal friends. The World upside down.
BeTidy ago
Someone I knew posted on facebook mocking a "friend" of hers for accusing her of making her son gay. She asked her "gay friends" on faceplant if it was possible for a person to be made into a homo. Of course they all used the useful political fiction of "its in the genes". Not long after I had a weekend away with a group including the lady, and she devoted her time to trying to get men to do "gay things" including painting one guys tonails. Turned out she was a leader of a University group called Gay Straight Alliance or something like that. Absolutely obviously devoting her life to having everyone she could influence to be gay. Dressed her boy up in her clothes, got him dolls. Her friend was right. I know another woman doing the same thing, but not so extreme. Takes her son to a special ballet group where they dress boys up in Tutus. Another friend's new wife is divorced with a boy. She's dressing him up. Has him wear a beauty queen sash and tiara for photos. Guaranteed way to get rid of her old husband who no doubt disapproves. Disapprove of your son "being gay" and don't expect custody time. That's NZ, I would guess we'd be pretty bad for that now, I suspect worse than the US and Australia anyway.