This submission was linked from this v/pizzagate comment by @darkknight111.

^{Posted automatically (#9506) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.}

This submission was linked from this v/pizzagate comment by @darkknight111.

^{Posted automatically (#9501) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.}

https://mobile.twitter.com/search?q=bernie%20najarian&src=typed_query

Ran a search on the bastard.

https://mobile.twitter.com/Securityconcern Found the account.

Yeah that guy came back to Twitter a few days ago implying I use a fake name just because he has my complete life history on his computer and he calls me by my ex's last name. Then he says to sue us all. I was laughing my ass off. He's been butthurt about us for a pretty long time. He's a moron to think anyone will listen to a pedo about pizzagate being fake. He could have thought about that before writing two articles on it but he's too I'll to see it.

Look at his long winded writing style, quote methods, lefty viewpoints, and constant defending of lefty elites.

Looks very similar in writing style to one of the shills over here. Could this be the identity of AreWeSure? He is on the record not saying that merely being a pedophile is a crime as @BlackSmith21 has pulled out of him.

justpaste - https://archive.is/VuZOI and https://archive.is/POIqa

boywiki - https://archive.is/ScLvU

A pedophile's view of Our Children and what he thinks our view is of Our Children

Americans, at least those of European ethnic background, are more-or-less divided between what I call romanticists and ironics. Romanticists tend to see the world in black-and-white terms, a confrontation between angels and demons. Children, to them, are among the angels, at least in theory (in real life, the brats may get it, but in theory they’re beyond precious). Proper décor in the household is all about niceness, or in religious homes, inspiration. For ironics, events like the holocaust made sentimental fervor and passionate locals-first politics suspect. They may be moved by the cuteness and innocent sincerity of a child, but feel compelled to make worldly and ironic remarks to show they’re not going over to the sentimental side. Their home décor may include elements that acknowledge human cruelty or sexuality, even if children are present – they think of this material as a needed reality check and a defense against woolly jingoism.

YES Children are they angels. I make no apologies for thinking that they are. Brats? Of course someone that wants to defile an Angel Child would call them Brats. Moved by Innocent Sincerity of a Child? Exactly, Why Not? I can tell you what else I may be moved by. By the Guilt of a Narcissistic Pedophile Raper of Angelic Children. These are the Disgusting Views of a Demonic Mind that resorts to calling me and others of European Ethnic Background wrong for trying to protect Our Angelic Children from his Sick Perverted wants and needs that will suck the Life from Their Souls. Anyone with a Real Brain can pick out his Hatred for Our Children. The True and Deep Down Evil that makes him act on his Sick Crimes.

We see the world in black and white? Between angels and demons? YES. Evil and Good is Black and White to us. But not to you. To You it is Fuzzy. That's what makes you reconcile your Evil Deeds. Angels and Demons? YES. Again Good and Evil. Shut up you Perverted Pedo. We will not fall for your veiled lies.

A pederast is trying to debunk PG? Bless his heart!

The level of detail? There's very little as far as I could see having quickly scanned that wall of text. Example:

At first, many sleuths were eager to connect Hillary Clinton to anything linking her to a scandal about child abductions in Haiti (https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5aupnh/breaking_i_believe_i_have_connected_a_convicted/). A Baptist church organization from Idaho had sent missionaries to earthquake-stricken Haiti, promising a better life in the U.S. or the Dominican Republic for children who’d lost their parents. The main organizer, Laura Silsby, ignored Haitian law and attempted to smuggle 33 kids across the Dominican border without papers. Many of them, it turned out, had perfectly good Haitian families, who had been persuaded the kids would be better off in a new life (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1249280/Haiti-earthquake-Missionaries-led-Laura-Silsby-accused-stealing-orphans.html). The missionaries were taken into custody at the border. Ultimately, Silsby served four months in a Haitian prison, and probably would have been there much longer had Bill Clinton not flown to Haiti to intervene on her behalf. The Reddit, 4chan and Twitter think-tanks burned with ambition to link Hillary Clinton or her charitable Clinton Foundation, heavily involved in Haitian earthquake relief, with ‘child trafficking.’ This line of pursuit, however, literally wasn’t very sexy, since there seemed little doubt that Silsby’s ambition was to satisfy the intense Baptist demand for adoptable future Christians, not to provide bodies for sexual exploitation.

What about Silsby going on to Amber Alert? And the connections with the Maccoby's. The obvious CIA connections of that whole ring of people? Their generational links with third world 'adoption agencies' and other child related institutions? The Podesta Group's involvement with Amber Alert? With the boards that Heather Podesta sits on, like the Washington DC Police Foundation. The tales of corruption of the DC police chiefs, including the support of one chief for Alefantis when he himself has been accused of corruption in the case of the rape of an 11 year old?

I could go on. Just seems like a bog standard article on 'debunking' to me.