Well, duh...
Tech giants 'could stop child porn online if they wanted to', says chief of National Crime Agency is the headline in this Telegraph article, the majority of which is behind a paywall. But I think we get the gist of it with what we can see:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/09/30/tech-firms-must-do-tackle-rise-ofchild-abuse-images-shared-online/
Tech firms could end the proliferation of indecent images of children online instead of tolerating it, the National Crime Agency (NCA) chief leading the fight against child abuse has said.
Rob Jones said the firms had the technology to be more proactive to prevent images reaching the web in the first place to stop crime happening and to hunt down paedophiles grooming children.
In an interview with The Telegraph, he warned their approach was too reactive and there was a danger of online child abuse being normalised in society by the continued proliferation of thousands of images that were too easy to access on the “open” web.
Further information in these other articles published earlier in the year:
Internet firms are failing to tackle child abuse images, police chief says
National Crime Agency also reveals rise in sexual attacks on and interest in children
Tech companies 'must stop paedophiles uploading child sex abuse images', National Crime Agency says
“Why wouldn’t we stop tens of thousands of children getting exploited and abused if we have the means to do it?”
Well Rob, that's what we've been asking for years now on these forums.
view the rest of the comments →
derram ago
https://archive.fo/AM5Rh :
https://archive.fo/1s5hk :
https://archive.fo/3ypiI :
This has been an automated message.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
telegraph - https://archive.is/eXjHk
nytimes - https://archive.is/C678K
lifesitenews - https://archive.is/4QjVd
foxnews - https://archive.is/dbB0L
nbcnews - https://archive.is/g3wZb