We are seeing a resurgence of public interest in this ongoing citizen investigation regarding the Podesta brothers, the Clintons, and many others as it relates to "Pizzagate" or as some others prefer to call it "Pedogate" (I prefer the former). With this we are seeing a lot of newcomers who are seeking truth and wanting to help shine some light on this darkness.
There are MOUNTAINS of existing circumstantial evidence that points towards these key players being heavily involved in some very sinister criminal behaviors. At best, we can call these people sexual deviants with many pedophilic proclivities. At worst, we can call these people child sex traffickers, rapists, occultist luciferians who participate in human sacrifice and possibly even cannibalism!
At this point, it is important to remember exactly HOW many of these revelations and connections were made possible. While there are various ways to make these connections to see the network of criminal activity it is important to remember the role that Wikileaks has played in all this. Wikileaks was the original publisher of the leaked Podesta emails, HRC emails, DNC emails, and the Stratfor emails. While combing through all these leaked emails citizen investigators started to notice the disturbingly frequent use of coded language that included terms like "Pizza, Cheese, Pasta, Walnut Sauce, ect".
Pizzagate/Pedogate can be proven to be a valid investigation WITH or WITHOUT the Wikileaks emails but I still believe it is important to acknowledge the vital role that Wikileaks and Julian Assange have played in helping "redpill" the masses on this topic. The point of this post is to provide an important reminder that NO ONE IS DENYING THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE LEAKED EMAILS!
Below are just a few examples of how the Wikileaks emails are in fact REAL EMAILS FROM HRC, PODESTA, DNC, Etc. Don't take my word for it, take it straight from the horses mouth!
Podesta confirms emails (Washington Post) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5iiCN_AiQXI
Podesta confirms emails (CNN) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUM3GssPbLs
HRC confirms emails (2016 Presidential Debate) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtJiksdZI5U&t=9s
Podesta confirms emails (CNN) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FhssYLar-E&t=1s
Podesta confirms emails (FOX) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10ptrtgNEEk
Jake Taper confirms emails (CNN) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTetHZ-r-hk
view the rest of the comments →
Are_we_sure ago
Wikileaks was not the original publisher of the HRC emails. They were released by the State Department.
This is utter nonsense and there's not a single use of code in the Podesta emails. This suggestion of this code came from a single anonymous user. It was a hoax pure and simple. For example what do you think pasta with walnut sauce means?
Basically the emails were so boring with some embarrassing political high jinks here and there, that people had to make up a scandal. And they did and people bought it.
Psalm144-1 ago
"Ps do you think I'll do better playing dominoes on cheese than on pasta?'
Apparently resident shill AWS thinks that is not code word. Showing once again, AWS is either retarded or full blown spirit-cooking shill!
Are_we_sure ago
It's absolutely not code. It's an odd phrasing but make clear sense in its context.
I don't understand something so it must be code is not evidence. Your suspicion is not evidence, In fact, you're engaging in a common logical fallacy called argument from incredulity.
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/196/Argument-from-Incredulity
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Argument_from_incredulity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_fallacy
awakenaware ago
"odd phrasing but make clear sense in this context" Ok?! What context. Please explain how the odd phrasing makes clear sense. I'll bet you can't. Because your full of shit. You just make statements like this all the time as the shill pedo apologist you clearly are. It's such an obvious tactic. You say their is no evidence of such and such, when there is.. and then you say there is evidence to support your stance, but you don't cite that evidence. Yawn.
Psalm144-1 ago
@awakenaware Shills gonna shill.... Imagine how pathetic of an existence it must be for @are_we_sure . Wake up everyday and take instructions from your deep state handler on how to try and discourage people from researching this very real issue. Even though I resent AWS's actions I still pray for their soul. I imagine that Are_we_sure probably got sucked into this whirlwind via some other, possibly unrelated, circumstance and before they knew it they were trying to help cover up these unspeakable actions of our global "leaders". What a shitty life to live! I truly feel sorry for you AWS!