We are seeing a resurgence of public interest in this ongoing citizen investigation regarding the Podesta brothers, the Clintons, and many others as it relates to "Pizzagate" or as some others prefer to call it "Pedogate" (I prefer the former). With this we are seeing a lot of newcomers who are seeking truth and wanting to help shine some light on this darkness.
There are MOUNTAINS of existing circumstantial evidence that points towards these key players being heavily involved in some very sinister criminal behaviors. At best, we can call these people sexual deviants with many pedophilic proclivities. At worst, we can call these people child sex traffickers, rapists, occultist luciferians who participate in human sacrifice and possibly even cannibalism!
At this point, it is important to remember exactly HOW many of these revelations and connections were made possible. While there are various ways to make these connections to see the network of criminal activity it is important to remember the role that Wikileaks has played in all this. Wikileaks was the original publisher of the leaked Podesta emails, HRC emails, DNC emails, and the Stratfor emails. While combing through all these leaked emails citizen investigators started to notice the disturbingly frequent use of coded language that included terms like "Pizza, Cheese, Pasta, Walnut Sauce, ect".
Pizzagate/Pedogate can be proven to be a valid investigation WITH or WITHOUT the Wikileaks emails but I still believe it is important to acknowledge the vital role that Wikileaks and Julian Assange have played in helping "redpill" the masses on this topic. The point of this post is to provide an important reminder that NO ONE IS DENYING THE AUTHENTICITY OF THE LEAKED EMAILS!
Below are just a few examples of how the Wikileaks emails are in fact REAL EMAILS FROM HRC, PODESTA, DNC, Etc. Don't take my word for it, take it straight from the horses mouth!
Podesta confirms emails (Washington Post) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5iiCN_AiQXI
Podesta confirms emails (CNN) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUM3GssPbLs
HRC confirms emails (2016 Presidential Debate) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtJiksdZI5U&t=9s
Podesta confirms emails (CNN) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FhssYLar-E&t=1s
Podesta confirms emails (FOX) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10ptrtgNEEk
Jake Taper confirms emails (CNN) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTetHZ-r-hk
view the rest of the comments →
evilyehttheylive ago
Nothing is 100% credible. Everyone knows that. Not discounting your post, just stating obvious fact. Why spread such things around? Unless you have proof of one hundred percent reliability?
fogdryer ago
You a nonbeliever?
evilyehttheylive ago
Nonbeliever in what? Read what I wrote it's quite simple. Nothing is one hundred percent reliable. That is a fact of life. I also said I'm not discounting the post. To say that an online source, started by people we have never met is one hundred percent reliable is false. I didn't make the statement. The burden of proof to show one hundred percent reliability isn't on me. Of course WikiLeaks and many other sources of information have given us a lot. But they are not one hundred percent reliable.
So, am I a nonbeliever of what?
Blacksmith21 ago
I'm glad to see reasonable debate still goes on. @evilyehttheylive is right in that no "intelligence", evidence, or information is every 100%. It may be 99.5%, but there is always the "freak factor". The one random thing no one considered.
Using your choice of analytic methods, they will all come back saying the likelihood of disinformation is high (90%), but it's penetration low, (<10%).
It's too easy to shoot holes in stuff. We can disprove just about anything if it's a fraud, disinfo, misinfo, etc.
What's harder to weight is the reliability of the source. While I could never say Wikileaks is 100% accurate, because we do not know what may be disproved at some point, I would state that in their history they've never been proven wrong.
And when you have a 100% source, you "trust but verify" to quote Reagan.
What I do see here are a lot of the trustworthy old timers (like me), which is great to see. The Q noise has risen above PG topics, though there is no shortage of new information to sift through. And it is all related. Pizzagate is coming back up in discussion and "news".
Like the Wired article I posted about. They keep bringing it up. Why?