Survey finds six out of 10 Catholics give him a ‘fair’ or ‘poor” rating, while just three out of 10 say his handling of abuse has been ‘excellent’ or ‘good’
Confidence in Pope Francis’s handling of the sexual abuse scandal that has engulfed the Catholic church this year has fallen sharply among the faithful in the US, a new survey shows.
Francis, once seen as a charismatic and popular leader who drew huge crowds of Catholics and non-Catholics when he visited the US in September 2015, has also seen his personal ratings plummet.
More than a third of Catholics now say the pope is doing a “poor” job on the issue of sexual abuse – three times the number who delivered the same verdict in 2015, according to research by the Pew Research Center.
Even among those who say they attend mass weekly, the share giving Francis positive marks for his handling of the crisis has halved since 2015, down to 34% compared to 67% three years ago.
Quite astonishing, that 34% have still tunnel vision.
The proportion of Catholics who have a generally favourable opinion of Francis has fallen by 12 points this year, down to roughly seven in 10. Only three in 10 say they have a “very favourable” view of the pope.
Among the US public as a whole, including non-Catholics, about half hold a favourable view of Francis – the lowest rating he has received in Pew surveys since he was elected pope in 2013. His ratings are now on a par with his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI.
Francis has struggled to get on top of a wave of sexual abuse scandals that have broken into the open this year, not only in the US but also in Australia, Chile, Germany and the Netherlands.
In the US, a grand jury report into clerical abuse in Pennsylvania, released in August, found that 300 priests had harmed more than 1,000 children over several decades. The abuse was compounded by collusion and concealment by senior church figures and attempts to silence and intimidate survivors.
Francis made no comment for almost a week, but then issued a letter to the world’s 1.2 billion Catholics that publicly acknowledged the church’s failures in dealing with clerical sexual abuse.
I'm sure this will really help survivors. /s
Published in seven languages, the letter spoke of “sorrow and shame” and said: “Let us beg forgiveness for our own sins and the sins of others.”
That he even mentions forgiveness is really outrageous imo.
But it failed to propose any specific measures or sanctions against bishops who had been found to cover up abuse or had omitted to report it to police or other authorities.
The pope has also been accused of failing to act on abuse by two people who resigned in protest from a papal commission set up by the Vatican to make recommendations on the church’s role in child protection. One, Marie Collins, an abuse survivor from Ireland, said the issue was handled “with fine words in public and contrary actions behind closed doors”.
On a trip to Ireland in August, survivors criticised the pope for offering sympathetic words but no concrete actions.
Opponents of Pope Francis within the Vatican and the church have seized on his missteps to attack him. A retired Vatican diplomat, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, released an incendiary 11-page letter claiming Francis had known of abuse allegations against a high-ranking church figure from 2013, but failed to take action.
Viganò’s claims had the backing of the Vatican’s old guard, which bitterly resents Francis’s efforts to root out what it views as centuries of clerical tradition and he sees as hypocrisy and narcissism.
Source.
view the rest of the comments →
EffYouJohnPodesta ago
I wonder how many of the people helping with the adoption industry are actually from the Catholic church but are doing this intentionally to get more supply of children to abuse. I always thought anti-abortion promotion of adoption was mostly good until I realized how many children are stolen by CPS. The adoption at birth industry only dawned on me as being bad when I witnessed, on Facebook, a woman who was in a natural birth group with me posting about her surrogacy journey. She was selling her baby to a couple she didn't even know from another state for a $30,000 fee. They needed the money. When she couldn't get pregnant from donor egg and sperm from the intended parents, or from donor sperm and her own eggs implanted, she resorted to getting pregnant with her own husband's baby and selling it to the couple. I did some research a while back on the surrogacy industry and what I found was pretty suspicious. In some countries it is banned completely as it is considered child sales. And in many states in the U.S. it is illegal to act as a surrogate. It's a felony in some states.
I guess the supply is mostly older children from CPS, but I have heard that there were actually bounties on some certain younger babies.
This is also why the DNA registries exist in my opinion. The PKU testing done at birth would be fine and dandy except that the state stores our DNA in their database and they always have copies. They can come after certain children for the purposes of organ harvesting or MKU experiements through false CPS cases at any time.