Survey finds six out of 10 Catholics give him a ‘fair’ or ‘poor” rating, while just three out of 10 say his handling of abuse has been ‘excellent’ or ‘good’
Confidence in Pope Francis’s handling of the sexual abuse scandal that has engulfed the Catholic church this year has fallen sharply among the faithful in the US, a new survey shows.
Francis, once seen as a charismatic and popular leader who drew huge crowds of Catholics and non-Catholics when he visited the US in September 2015, has also seen his personal ratings plummet.
More than a third of Catholics now say the pope is doing a “poor” job on the issue of sexual abuse – three times the number who delivered the same verdict in 2015, according to research by the Pew Research Center.
Even among those who say they attend mass weekly, the share giving Francis positive marks for his handling of the crisis has halved since 2015, down to 34% compared to 67% three years ago.
Quite astonishing, that 34% have still tunnel vision.
The proportion of Catholics who have a generally favourable opinion of Francis has fallen by 12 points this year, down to roughly seven in 10. Only three in 10 say they have a “very favourable” view of the pope.
Among the US public as a whole, including non-Catholics, about half hold a favourable view of Francis – the lowest rating he has received in Pew surveys since he was elected pope in 2013. His ratings are now on a par with his predecessor, Pope Benedict XVI.
Francis has struggled to get on top of a wave of sexual abuse scandals that have broken into the open this year, not only in the US but also in Australia, Chile, Germany and the Netherlands.
In the US, a grand jury report into clerical abuse in Pennsylvania, released in August, found that 300 priests had harmed more than 1,000 children over several decades. The abuse was compounded by collusion and concealment by senior church figures and attempts to silence and intimidate survivors.
Francis made no comment for almost a week, but then issued a letter to the world’s 1.2 billion Catholics that publicly acknowledged the church’s failures in dealing with clerical sexual abuse.
I'm sure this will really help survivors. /s
Published in seven languages, the letter spoke of “sorrow and shame” and said: “Let us beg forgiveness for our own sins and the sins of others.”
That he even mentions forgiveness is really outrageous imo.
But it failed to propose any specific measures or sanctions against bishops who had been found to cover up abuse or had omitted to report it to police or other authorities.
The pope has also been accused of failing to act on abuse by two people who resigned in protest from a papal commission set up by the Vatican to make recommendations on the church’s role in child protection. One, Marie Collins, an abuse survivor from Ireland, said the issue was handled “with fine words in public and contrary actions behind closed doors”.
On a trip to Ireland in August, survivors criticised the pope for offering sympathetic words but no concrete actions.
Opponents of Pope Francis within the Vatican and the church have seized on his missteps to attack him. A retired Vatican diplomat, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, released an incendiary 11-page letter claiming Francis had known of abuse allegations against a high-ranking church figure from 2013, but failed to take action.
Viganò’s claims had the backing of the Vatican’s old guard, which bitterly resents Francis’s efforts to root out what it views as centuries of clerical tradition and he sees as hypocrisy and narcissism.
Source.
view the rest of the comments →
WhenEveMetEnki ago
Quite astonishing, that 34% have still tunnel vision.
To be fair, this is very difficult for Catholics; recent historical precedent (and we as a society have generally a very short memory) has established a framework wherein our faith or the Pope (supposedly infallible and chosen to represent God) is attacked, as JFK was for instance, and we demonstrate and act upon our faith in the Almighty by ignoring those attacks. I've never been particularly religious in the organized sense as I simply couldn't ignore the historical evil that has always coexisted within, but even for me it is nearly impossible to hear the things arising of late without wanting to dismiss it as an aberration being used by one sect to diminish and/or usurp another.
The alternative, that all we were raised to believe represented God and good is actually a cover for those so evil and detached from the morality we're taught comes from God and is inherent in all man, is almost too awful to grasp, despite the growing mountain of evidence.
Vindicator ago
Uh, no. Catholics do not believe the pope is infallible. They believe that teaching of doctrine by the pope is infallible when he speaks ex cathedra, which has only happened a few times in history. The last time was in 1950, when Pope Pius XII affirmed the ancient tradition that the Virgin Mary was assumed bodily into heaven after her death, not buried in a grave.
Any Catholic who thinks the Church teaches a human being is "infallible" in the colloquial sense is a very poorly formed Catholic. The Church has always taught exactly the opposite -- that humans, while made in the likeness of God and precious in his eyes, are prone to evil and must be constantly alert to temptation and deception, both within and without.
WhenEveMetEnki ago
Jay and Jill were beautiful and handsome
This is a complex phrase, in which Subject A is described by adjective A and subject B by adjective B.
I was referring to the framework (a system of thinking that evolves much more than the literal teachings that contribute to it, along with the many imperfections of our minds) within which we view our faith as infallible and the Pope as chosen to represent God.
I suspect you know that's what I meant, unless you skimmed it very quickly.
Vindicator ago
No, I didn't catch that nuance. Thanks for clarifying :-)