You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

WhenEveMetEnki ago

Quite astonishing, that 34% have still tunnel vision.

To be fair, this is very difficult for Catholics; recent historical precedent (and we as a society have generally a very short memory) has established a framework wherein our faith or the Pope (supposedly infallible and chosen to represent God) is attacked, as JFK was for instance, and we demonstrate and act upon our faith in the Almighty by ignoring those attacks. I've never been particularly religious in the organized sense as I simply couldn't ignore the historical evil that has always coexisted within, but even for me it is nearly impossible to hear the things arising of late without wanting to dismiss it as an aberration being used by one sect to diminish and/or usurp another.

The alternative, that all we were raised to believe represented God and good is actually a cover for those so evil and detached from the morality we're taught comes from God and is inherent in all man, is almost too awful to grasp, despite the growing mountain of evidence.

Vindicator ago

established a framework wherein our faith or the Pope (supposedly infallible and chosen to represent God)

Uh, no. Catholics do not believe the pope is infallible. They believe that teaching of doctrine by the pope is infallible when he speaks ex cathedra, which has only happened a few times in history. The last time was in 1950, when Pope Pius XII affirmed the ancient tradition that the Virgin Mary was assumed bodily into heaven after her death, not buried in a grave.

Any Catholic who thinks the Church teaches a human being is "infallible" in the colloquial sense is a very poorly formed Catholic. The Church has always taught exactly the opposite -- that humans, while made in the likeness of God and precious in his eyes, are prone to evil and must be constantly alert to temptation and deception, both within and without.

WhenEveMetEnki ago

Jay and Jill were beautiful and handsome

This is a complex phrase, in which Subject A is described by adjective A and subject B by adjective B.

I was referring to the framework (a system of thinking that evolves much more than the literal teachings that contribute to it, along with the many imperfections of our minds) within which we view our faith as infallible and the Pope as chosen to represent God.

I suspect you know that's what I meant, unless you skimmed it very quickly.

Vindicator ago

No, I didn't catch that nuance. Thanks for clarifying :-)