You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

Alright, HennyPenny, since you insist on pushing this as related to human sacrifice, I will flair it as Disinformation.

There is no archaeological evidence that the Arch of Triumph at Palmyra, which was built hundreds of years after the temples were built there and is not an "entrance" to any of them, was anything but a typical victory arch like those erected by Roman conquerors all over the Mediterranean.

This is Fake News you are pushing. Here is what was said about the ISIS destruction of the arch at the time:

Maamoun Abdulkarim told Reuters that sources in Palmyra had confirmed that the Arch of Triumph, a jewel in the exquisite collection of ruins in the oasis city, had been blown up...“It’s as though there is a curse that has befallen this city and I expect only news that will shock us. If the city remains in their hands the city is doomed,” Abdulkarim told Reuters.

“It is now wanton destruction ... their acts of vengeance are no longer ideologically driven because they are now blowing up buildings with no religious meaning,” he added.

HennyPenny ago

This Arch led to the Temple of Baal which was active during the Arch's construction and afterwards The arch was built 202 AD. http://endtimesforecaster.blogspot.com/2016/09/nyc-and-arch-of-triumph-for-whom-will.html The temple would have been closed during the persecution of pagans in the late Roman Empire in a campaign against the temples of the East made by Maternus Cynegius, Praetorian Prefect of Oriens, between 25 May 385 to 19 March 388.[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_of_Bel

Vindicator ago

Sorry. The Wikipedia article you just linked says otherwise.

Its ruins were considered among the best preserved at Palmyra,[4] until they were further destroyed by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria in August 2015.[5] The arched main entrance into the temple is still intact,[6] as well as its exterior walls and fortified gate.

The entrance arch to the temple is a different structure, and it is still standing. Your link has a picture of it.

Why are you pushing this disinfo so hard, even after you've been shown -- with your own links -- this is BS?