Wondering who the shills are on Voat? I'm not one. Look no further than the PedosOnVoat.
I'm not willing to go click on this forum in any way but I stumbled onto this while looking at a forum called Qtards that I thought was funny. Then I noticed that the owner carlip apparently posts in PedosOnVoat.
Not going to even get into this as far as Q goes, but I did notice that in the forum that Jack Posobiec says to look at for the Q debunkery had a tranny on it writing a big old article so I think it's safe to say that the psy op is well staffed on both sides.
Why does Voat allow a forum called PedosOnVoat? WTAF
Because I took screenshots of the titles of two of his posts and one of them appeared to be a photo of two girls in underwear, I am making this post right now to let everyone know that carlip claims that it's a forum to out the pedos who are on voat and that it is safe to go on. Does anyone know if this is true? I'm going to guess not. Please someone debunk me so I don't have to turn in the entire forum to law enforcement.
https://imgur.com/a/GtmNZ5b
view the rest of the comments →
EricKaliberhall ago
Hey @EffYouJohnPodesta,
I'm going to delete this below standard submission per rule 1 relevance. Your total lack of respect for this research subverse is stunning. v/pizzagate is not your personal blog you self-centered cunt. If your objective is to get banned from this subverse, I believe you have succeeded.
@Vindicator @think-
EffYouJohnPodesta ago
It is impossible to post the evidence of what is in his two posts since I'm not going to click on it but there is a thumbnail of a photo of two girls in underwear as it is against the rules to post CP to the forum and I believe it's possible he's posting CP to that forum. The titles to me look like he's posting CP and he refuses to clarify calling me an SJW. Since nobody can prove this not to be the case I am left with reporting the subverse to law enforcement. Delete my post if you want, ban me if you want, I don't care. You guys can have your little Q party here if you want without critics and people who have actually been doing stuff to report pedophiles. You make nice posts, I make nice posts, look for more evidence to get probable cause and then report it to law enforcement. You however think that being sent death threats is a sign that you're a larper. Have a nice time in your uncle's basement Eric.
I give your comment a 24 hour flair for repeated disregard for subverse rules for moderators.
think- ago
@EricKaliberhall pulled the post because it doesn't adhere to Rule 1 (connection to elite pedophilia).
Btw., the post also doesn't adhere to Rule 2:
This means an actual link, not only a screenshot.
I can only shake my head about how you constantly show this community the middlefinger by deciding to not adhering to the most simple rules, @EffYouJohnPodesta.
That's pathetic, isn't it?
I'm not into Q, I have always said it's a psy-op, but I can tell you that I am annoyed about how you disregard the subverse rules. That were made by the community.
@Vindicator @Crensch @EricKaliberhall @ben_matlock
EffYouJohnPodesta ago
You guys have been attacking me on posts that I never anticipated and I've tried to follow all the rules but it seems like you flair all my posts, as I already explained, I'm happy to edit but it's this one that I do not think there is an actual way to edit. I already explained I didn't want to link to what I considered possible CP. Since nobody here could explain if it's true what he was saying and I have no way to independently verify this myself I just sent the link to the FBI to have them find out whether those pedos he is reporting on are posting actual CP to the forum. I don't know how you're able to verify this as a mod without getting in hot water legally but I know in my life I plan on making no clicks on any links that appear to be CP. I personally don't even ever want to see "normal" porn. TTYL
think- ago
Yes, and that's precisely why the post was pulled, not flaired.
And what part of 'this post doesn't cover elite pedophilia' didn't you understand?
No, you didn't. You choose to ignore the most simple rules here. Again and again.
I didn't say you should post a link to possible CP. I said each posts requires at least one link. This post shouldn't have posted to v/pizzagate in the first place.
No, we don't. Stop playing the victim, EYJP.
You have a formal ban warning now. I suggest to take some time, actually a good amount of time to study the rules carefullly.
I will take one for the team and ban you, if you should submit more posts that don't adhere to the rules.
Friendly reminder: The rules were made by the community. Each time you choose to ignore the rules, you show the communtiy the middlefinger.
@Vindicator @Crensch @EricKaliberhall @ben_matlock
EffYouJohnPodesta ago
I can't follow your rules no matter how hard I try because you interpret everything I do as giving you the middle finger. Ban me if you want, I don't want to be banned, but I can't fix your point of view.
Crensch ago
Because you're either fantastically stupid, or setting yourself up to be banned on purpose.
Because you're either fantastically stupid, or setting yourself up to be banned on purpose.
Why didn't you take your happy ass to somewhere else if you're having such issues? Hmmm... could it be that you're setting the stage for some drama?
Don't worry, if you're a shill, your name is in employment records, and you'll be hunted down like those that pay you. If you're not a shill, your life expectancy is low anyway, because you're too stupid to follow directions, and some gloriously dangerous product you try to use will kill you.
At least we're all comfortable in knowing that any problems where you're concerned will soon be no more.
think- ago
Well, then you obviously didn't try hard, did you?
It's actually very simple:
Start with Rule 1.
Check: Is the post about pedophilia? Yes => Might be suitable for v/pizzagate. No (like posts about trafficking or sexual harassment of adults => Cannot be posted to v/pizzagate.
Check: Is the post about elites? Yes => Might be suitable for v/pizzagate. No => Cannot be posted to v/pizzagate.
If you check both criteria above, and get 2 x 'Yes' => Post can be submitted to v/pizzagate. If you get at least 1 x 'No' => Post cannot be submitted to v/pizzagate.
That's simple. But for unknown reasons, this seems to be too difficult for you.
And submitting again and again posts that don't adhere to Rule 1 when it's really simple to check a draft, and will only take 1-2 minutes to do so, is showing the communtiy the middle finger.
And then we have Rule 2 which says every post should contain a link.
Check: Does the post contain at least one link?
Yes => Can be posted to v/pizzagate. No => Cannot be posted to v/pizzagate.
As I said, please stop playing the victim card. Everybody can overlook something from time to time, but even after we kindly asked again and again to please adhere to the rules, you just post your stuff, without checking it.
It begs the question now whether you've been doing it on purpose to provoke a ban, @EffYouJohnPodesta.
Over and out.
think-
@Vindicator @Crensch @EricKaliberhall @ben_matlock
Vindicator ago
Great flow chart! Someone should make a graphic of it, and we should include it in the CSS rule warning that pops up when you submit a post!
@Heygeorge, would this be possible?
think- ago
Thanks, @Vindicator! Great idea! :-) I'll try to add stuff from other rules as well.
But I'd need someone who does a graphic. @ben_matlock might know how to do it.
Ben? :-)
heygeorge ago
Ha! As you guys get it worked out, let me know. @Vindicator
EffYouJohnPodesta ago
I've been posting the same stuff here for 2 years, occasionally you guys have flaired a post, until recently when Eric attacked me for following ES. It's in your head that I'm a shill, so you flair every post of mine, almost every single one, for the past month. For that reason alone I'm not posting again as a submission to avoid a ban. You're all behaving incredibly abusively. You can think what you want about me. I no longer really care. I've posted proof of what I said yesterday about my network going out during the re-check of my cop trafficking kiddo post to my twitter. I never said your mods did it. You guys have a clique and I'm not in it. This will be the last response to any of your stupid responses. I understand none of you like me any more because you think I'm a shill because of Jenny Moore who is someone I never knew. And I don't really care.
Vindicator ago
Just which Moderator Rule are you suggesting @EricKaliberhall violated, EffYou? That is a serious claim, and you had better be able to back it up. The Moderator Rules are linked in the sidebar. I'm waiting.
@think- @Crensch
EffYouJohnPodesta ago
I thought there was a 24 hour grace period flair in place. Is that not a mod rule? If so I apologize.
Vindicator ago
The 24 Hour Grace flair is not a rule binding moderators. It's a policy change -- a way of administering the submission rules -- that @think- and I willingly instituted despite the fact that it takes MUCH more time and effort from mods, to help people learn to make better posts with the help of the community. It was never intended to be a license to post whatever you want for 24 hours and "see what sticks". In fact, @Crensch and @kevdude both were skeptical it was a good idea and predicted it would be abused to wear down mods and allow forum sliding.