On Video: Whistleblower says Bergoglio allows Catholic elite in Rome access to child sex slaves from Argentina (pizzagate)

submitted ago by Factfinder2

These are two video interviews conducted in Portuguese by another whistleblower, Natacha Jaitt, whose revelations were discussed in this Voat thread:

Argentinian Prostitute Documented Pedophile Crimes of Pope's Boyfriend Gustavo Vera: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2710995

Related Voat thread:

Does Pope Bergoglio Have a Boyfriend? https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2698993

https://www.barnhardt.biz/2018/09/12/nuclear-bombshell-argentinian-whistleblower-interview-bergoglio-allows-the-catholic-elite-in-rome-to-have-access-to-gustavo-veras-child-sex-slaves/ Archive: https://archive.fo/Ujpz2

Notes on first interview:

"Artem Reshetnyak (Ukrainian) introduces himself. He’s lives in Argentina and is engaged to a known escort named Lucilla, who is originally from Uruguay. They’ve been together for 3 years.

He ran a blog from Summer 2013 – Fall 2017 where he publicly denounced the pedophilic and sex trafficking network led by Gustavo Vera. He conducted his own investigation for these posts

He says an official came to his home (where he lived with Lucilla) and gave a warning: his girlfriend had to stop promoting herself (as a prostitute) – Gustavo’s orders – and if he didn’t stop talking about Gustavo online they would kill him. He doesn’t share the name of this officer.

He wrote an article about how the media gives a false impression on the nature of human trafficking, focusing on the adult female victims and not mentioning the children and male victims. Says homosexual and pedophilic sex slavery is more common.

He agrees with Jaitt when she says that La Alameda promises to help victims working in poor conditions in illegal sweatshops, but instead takes advantage of them. He was contacted by an informant (who he wants to keep confidential) who divulged information on the criminal activities of the organization: sex trafficking, pedophilia, blackmail.

He started working with Martes Rojos, a Latino organization dedicated to ending sex trafficking in the most vulnerable neighborhoods.

Natacha says everything he’s reporting confirms what she’s been working on – La Alameda subjugates the very people they’re claiming to liberate. Artem agrees and says that Gustavo Vera manages this network, he’s directly involved in its operation. The video cuts off as he is talking about sharing data against Vera."

Notes on second interview:

"Sources of income that fund Gustavo Vera: Bergoglio and also extorting sweatshops using illegal hiring practices (Gustavo’s mafia gets paid to not alert authorities to the crimes of these businesses)

Another source of funds is selling drugs. Uses the organization to gain an advantage over local gangs, just like La Alameda is used to shut down brothel competition. They selectively target areas and then install their own network. This network is not like the local gang culture, which abides by a traditional code of conduct, e.g. the La Alameda mafia sells drugs to school children, because once they are hooked on drugs they are easier for La Alameda manipulate.

Lucia Perez, the victim of abuse and ultimately murder at the hand of Gustavo’s mafia.

Children are kidnapped (one group that does the kidnapping – the Stolen Childhood Network, which claims to be a group to help children) from the poorer neighborhoods and are victims of the pedophile network which also brings in a lot of income.

Natasha repeats the idea that these children are targeted because they have no resources, no power, the judicial system is not concerned with maintaining their safety or upholding the law in their case. She equates it to the prostitution and pedophilia networks run in the soccer leagues. Artem agrees with everything she’s saying.

The headquarters of the human trafficking operation is the in the Northern part of the country but the network has an international reach: Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay, Chile, Peru, Spain, Italy, including Rome. There’s a big demand for blonde European children.

There are many other important people involved in addition to Gustavo Vera – Juan Carr (runs The Solidarity Network) whose organization pretends to look for missing children but actually kidnaps children. They give false hope to families who have missing children, when they find the child they keep the child as a sex slave.

Bergoglio provides funding and protection for La Alameda and allows the Catholic elite in Rome to have access to the children. Creating centers for disadvantaged children makes the children dependent on them, because they have no resources other than the Church."

This is a large information drop. See article for additional names, documentation and links.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

thekla ago

If you will permit me some patience in this. About two weeks ago Francis preached the tactic of "silence" in the face of all the homosexual and pederasty revelations in his church. It was, to say the least, shocking. But in looking deeper we find it is nothing new. That is his pattern. This is from 2012 or so.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=329&v=WqM3WeRl7Z4

Factfinder2 ago

In Argentina, he was a deadly silencer of opposition. That's no doubt what has prompted whistleblower Archbishop Vigano to issue a dead man's switch: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2718425

What's reallly odd about Bergoglio is his apparent switch from conservative in Argentina to progressive now that he's pope. You have to wonder whether he's an actor in a larger plan.

thekla ago

I'm not convinced he was a conservative in fact. Argentina, in is known for a particular sort of theology, Liberation Theology. We know it best in the form of Jeremiah Wright. Recognize that name? If you don't, think Obama's pastor in Chicago. That's the sort of theology he had. It could be that Francis was still "silent" even in that, meaning he didn't parade it about.

Recall that photo from Q 1953?

Evo Morales gave that cross as a gift to Francis on his first trip back to South America. Francis wasn’t pleased with it. You can read about it in the article I've linked. But here’s the deal.

  1. Morales had to have felt comfortable in giving that gift to him. There was something in Francis that permitted him to do this. Something that allowed him to say, “This is right for this man.” You don't just give that sort of a gift to a pope unless you know you can. You don't want to make the Pope mad. Morales thought he was safe to do it.
  2. Francis was a priest in South America for many years before he was a Pope visiting from Italy.
  3. That means Morales would likely have heard him once or several times as a priest, bishop, or cardinal.
  4. When Francis the Pope rejected the gift he was recognizing what should be according to Roman Catholic tradition. The cross was not right with that.
  5. However, how a man speaks and what he does as a priest toward his people speaks more loudly as to what he really believes.
  6. Morales gave him that sort of cross because Francis spoke that sort of theology. He acted like a Communist with the government. He was a Communist.

The new Pope was “outed” in that picture. Not by what he rejected, but by what one of his former parishioners gave him as a gift. He is a Communist. An infidel.

http://time.com/3952444/pope-francis-crucifix-hammer-and-sickle/

See, that picture is mirroring. Evo Morales is reflecting back to Francis who he truly is.

Factfinder2 ago

Bergoglio turned liberation theologists over to the military junta. You're saying that was for show--that he was pretending to be conservative? Could be.

thekla ago

"Bergoglio turned liberation theologists over to the military junta." I wouldn't put it that way. His theological form is classified as Liberation Theology. That is important to understand how he sees his place in the world regarding politics. Liberation Theology is more at home with Socialism, which is the forerunner to Communism. That's what has him by the willies right now. His Liberation Theology is what makes him say thing like, "Who am I to condemn?" about gays. Then it leads him to think he must be silent in the face of overwhelming evidence of pedo- and priest- pederasty abuse. His silence was a condemnation in the past. This is what he needs to face. It is now a condemnation of sorts to many who recognize it for what it is, failure to speak for the innocent. That is his pattern. Liberation Theology is the Obama "Lead from Behind" sort of stuff. Sometimes people need to be called out for what they have done wrong.

I think what this is doing is leading up to something sinister. Softening people to accepting a gay priesthood, and eventually pedophilia. After all, if they cannot be cured, if they are "born that way," if they cannot be condemned, then they must be accepted. An now Francis has called his critic the devil. Is this not a familiar patter over all?

Factfinder2 ago

I think what this is doing is leading up to something sinister. Softening people to accepting a gay priesthood, and eventually pedophilia. After all, if they cannot be cured, if they are "born that way," if they cannot be condemned, then they must be accepted

Obviously true. Doesn't look like it's going to pan out for Bergo, though. People are beginning to come to their senses.