Discussion of CPS Investigating Unfounded Cases in Chicago Tribune (pizzagate)

submitted ago by EffYouJohnPodesta

http://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/ct-life-leaving-kids-alone-moms-shamed-20180820-story.html#

http://archive.is/PhqsO

https://parentalrightsfoundation.org/neglect-dog-walking/ http://archive.is/mdnW1

To me this gets to a pretty crucial question of law which is why CPS even exists. They have in most places, completely anonymous reports, the ability to take your children with less than probable cause, the ability to terminate your rights with a standard of clear and convincing evidence / preponderance. You never get to find out who your accuser is for up to a year after a case is ruled out and possibly never otherwise, and they remove kids all the time in cases that have no criminal charges. If it doesn't rise to the level of criminal charges, the right to an attorney, etc. then it shouldn't be a case. Family courts operate without the absolute right to an appointed attorney. It's how the racket exists.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

@EffYouJohnPodesta, please edit this post to clearly articulate how it is relevant to the sexual abuse of kids by the global elite (Rule 1).

Also, I'm getting sick of flairing your posts because you can't bother to do this stuff. You know what the submission requirements are. You aren't new. You've had plenty of help from the community in editing previously flaired posts -- many of them in the past few weeks. It's not fair to users who honor the community submission requirements, or to mods who have to constantly ask you to edit. Nor is it fair to the others whom we have had to ban for repeated disregard for subverse submission rules for us to keep giving you edit flairs.

@think- @ben_matlock @EricKaliberhall

EffYouJohnPodesta ago

I've edited it and sent you a message.

Vindicator ago

Thank you for the edit, EYJP. Much better. I have removed the flair.

EffYouJohnPodesta ago

thank you