Whatever opinion of him you might hold, he interrupted a Congressional hearing and in front of all the MSM cameras brought up pedophiles controlling the government and even brought up Jeffery Epstein's island. This happened today.
https://www.pscp.tv/RealAlexJones/1yNxaXOVdybJj?t=6
At 24:33 he brought up Jeffery Epstein and his pedophile blackmail.
At 24:47 he says this.
"Half of this government is run off pedophilia"
I'm surprised Alex! I'm very torn on him but damn! He interrupted MSM and brought this up. He brought up Pizzagate and pedophile blackmail.
Edit: Alex Jones just got banned from Twitter. The broadcast is gone!
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/06/twitter-permanently-bans-alex-jones-and-infowars-accounts.html
view the rest of the comments →
Blacksmith21 ago
Competing hypothesis: What if AJ was from a good element of Mossad and is trying to get the word out about the pedos? Unit 8200? Israel's "NSA"?
Make sure you've seen this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7AsXqaFaxQ
think- ago
Good elements in Mossad?! That was a good one! LOL
Blacksmith21 ago
You are obviously clouded by confirmation bias. That sucks considering you are a mod.
think- ago
Ah, I must have stepped on your dick, @Blacksmith21. Lol.
Blacksmith21 ago
You already did that once. Or do I need to remind you, again? Stop being intellectually dishonest with yourself.
think- ago
Interesting reaction to my casual remark above.
I wonder why you try to spread disinfo, Blacksmith. It's clear that AJ is a limited hangout, and while there may be different factions in Mossad, you clearly don't make a career there as a 'good guy'.
But if you should have insider knowledge that says otherwise, I apologize of course. /sarc
Blacksmith21 ago
I have no idea which side AJ falls on. What would be his motivation for bringing everything Deep State to the surface? What would be the goal in challenging a shill like Rubio? There a lot of inconsistent facts associated with his current act.
And if offering a "competing hypothesis" is "spreading disinfo" as you say, then maybe it is time to scrutinize your actions? An intelligence analyst should be free as possible from confirmation bias, congruence bias, and distinction bias, or at least be aware of their existence when evaluating a scenario.
What I am hearing from you is "don't believe this guy he is spreading disinfo" for simply offering an alternate HYPOTHESIS not presented as factual in any form.
But of course, you are an expert on insider knowledge...
Time for some introspection, @think-
Just because you don't like my alternate theories, doesn't mean I (or anyone else) am spreading disinformation. In fact, if anyone should be up-to-speed on my accuracy pertaining to matters of military and intel here, it should be you.
think- ago
Suggesting that Alex Jones is a 'good Mossad guy' isn't a cogent, reasonable alternate viewpoint.
If you can present stories about white hats in Mossad, and their good deeds, I am all ears though.
After AJ's Social Media accounts have been taken down, and he got portrayed as a right-wing nutbag even more by MSM, their narrative that PG is a job by extreme right elements got 'confirmed' by his act. They can use it for bashing PG in the future.
Blacksmith21 ago
And based on the latest Q, I change my position. It's new "intel". I'm all in on Q, so time to dig in. AJ is bad Mossad.
@think-
The timeline from flash to bang is moving faster now. I thought the AJ/IW story would take a couple weeks to play out. I guess not. You can't be right without being wrong sometimes.
think- ago
Ok, I appreciate that. Thanks for letting me know, @Blacksmith21.
If you should consider doing a post about the Q drop on this, would you please ping me in? That would be great! Thanks.
Blacksmith21 ago
I'm sure the shills would love that. I'll leave the post for someone else.
think- ago
LOL. Ok. I will check the GA sub tomorrow to see whether someone has done a post. Cheers.