Whatever opinion of him you might hold, he interrupted a Congressional hearing and in front of all the MSM cameras brought up pedophiles controlling the government and even brought up Jeffery Epstein's island. This happened today.
https://www.pscp.tv/RealAlexJones/1yNxaXOVdybJj?t=6
At 24:33 he brought up Jeffery Epstein and his pedophile blackmail.
At 24:47 he says this.
"Half of this government is run off pedophilia"
I'm surprised Alex! I'm very torn on him but damn! He interrupted MSM and brought this up. He brought up Pizzagate and pedophile blackmail.
Edit: Alex Jones just got banned from Twitter. The broadcast is gone!
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/06/twitter-permanently-bans-alex-jones-and-infowars-accounts.html
view the rest of the comments →
Blacksmith21 ago
Competing hypothesis: What if AJ was from a good element of Mossad and is trying to get the word out about the pedos? Unit 8200? Israel's "NSA"?
Make sure you've seen this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7AsXqaFaxQ
think- ago
Good elements in Mossad?! That was a good one! LOL
Blacksmith21 ago
You are obviously clouded by confirmation bias. That sucks considering you are a mod.
think- ago
Ah, I must have stepped on your dick, @Blacksmith21. Lol.
Blacksmith21 ago
You already did that once. Or do I need to remind you, again? Stop being intellectually dishonest with yourself.
think- ago
Interesting reaction to my casual remark above.
I wonder why you try to spread disinfo, Blacksmith. It's clear that AJ is a limited hangout, and while there may be different factions in Mossad, you clearly don't make a career there as a 'good guy'.
But if you should have insider knowledge that says otherwise, I apologize of course. /sarc
Blacksmith21 ago
I have no idea which side AJ falls on. What would be his motivation for bringing everything Deep State to the surface? What would be the goal in challenging a shill like Rubio? There a lot of inconsistent facts associated with his current act.
And if offering a "competing hypothesis" is "spreading disinfo" as you say, then maybe it is time to scrutinize your actions? An intelligence analyst should be free as possible from confirmation bias, congruence bias, and distinction bias, or at least be aware of their existence when evaluating a scenario.
What I am hearing from you is "don't believe this guy he is spreading disinfo" for simply offering an alternate HYPOTHESIS not presented as factual in any form.
But of course, you are an expert on insider knowledge...
Time for some introspection, @think-
Just because you don't like my alternate theories, doesn't mean I (or anyone else) am spreading disinformation. In fact, if anyone should be up-to-speed on my accuracy pertaining to matters of military and intel here, it should be you.
think- ago
Suggesting that Alex Jones is a 'good Mossad guy' isn't a cogent, reasonable alternate viewpoint.
If you can present stories about white hats in Mossad, and their good deeds, I am all ears though.
After AJ's Social Media accounts have been taken down, and he got portrayed as a right-wing nutbag even more by MSM, their narrative that PG is a job by extreme right elements got 'confirmed' by his act. They can use it for bashing PG in the future.
Blacksmith21 ago
Let's dope through this....and again, I am not saying he is good/bad/American/Israeli, etc. There is a lot of information all over the place. Let's baseline a few things (I only have about 20 min then offline for most of the day) - we may have to continue this later.
Ground rules (R):
R1: Civil discourse only
R2: Quality citations only
Ground truths (T):
T1: AJ has been one of the earliest promoters of "conspiracy theories" - including many discussed within v/pizzagate and v/greatawakening - Sandy Hook, LV, Pizzagate;
T2: In general, AJs positions on controversial subject are mirrored here with minor difference, i.e. Sand Hook was a false flag operation;
T3: AJ social media shut down by entities known to be heavily associated with the Deep State and the US CIA;
T4: AJ has made a wide variety of statements which could indicate a wide variety of affiliations;
T5: CIA, Mossad, MI-6, and many other Western foreign intelligence agencies have been compromised and operate as part of the global Deep State. But, none of these intelligence agencies have been 100% corrupted by the Deep State.
Questions (Q):
Q1: If AJ is a limited hangout, then why shut down his operations? Who benefits - cui bono? Who loses the most? The single most important question (follow the money);
Q2: What's the possibility that AJ is not affiliated with anyone and is only in it for the money and all of the "associations" are just used to build more "mystery" = audience?
Q3: If AJ is "bad" Mossad (T5) then why are his loudest critics frequently associated with Deep State elements?
Regarding your question, I can lay ore out later, as I do have to run. This isn't exactly the response you want, as this was Unit 8200 (NSA) not Mossad, but this operation wouldn't have been possible without Mossad's involvement. I'll give you the day to read up on the genesis of Stuxnet and how we dealt a massive blow to Iran's uranium enrichment operations with the help of Israel's intelligence services:
https://www.businessinsider.com/us-israel-allies-2017-2
https://www.businessinsider.com/zero-days-stuxnet-cyber-weapon-2016-7
SchlongKeyhote ago
LOL! "muh Iran", huh?
So you're cool with Israel stealing our nuclear material (ruining the surrounding area in the process) to obtain THEIR bomb in the sixties,
and you think it's America's duty to prevent Iran using a bomb against Israel
and you don't acknowledge AJ's most outlandish claims of all ("Arabs control Hollywood") are meant to cover for Jews.
As I have always said, you are a KIKESHILL 100%, indeed by now a crude parody of one
Shizy ago
Shave your neck beard!