You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

carmencita ago

Thanks EYJP for bring this up. I don't know much about QAnon. I have always said I am just too busy on here, but we should all be curious as to whether Q was for real at the beginning and now is not. Which means that he/she may have been disposed of or locked up. Or if from all along was CIA or Mossad connections, etc. We all should have open minds and want to know the truth behind this Anon. I don't know for sure about Webb either, although there are many that have doubts about his sincerity. As I said, I don't know much about either, but was hoping to learn more. Thanks again.

EffYouJohnPodesta ago

Just to assume Q was never legit, if GW is correct about who it might be, then it's been a PsyOp. I saw this on another article I pulled up after finding the Wikileaks tweet a few days ago that basically said they agreed Q was an insider group pulling a fast one on activists. https://www.thedailybeast.com/inside-the-q-group-the-directorate-hunting-down-edward-snowden?ref=scroll

It basically makes me wonder why this would connect back to trying to hunt Snowden since I don't follow Q and I don't know what is being dropped. I did watch it for a while in the beginning but the NLP combined with the MK Ultra trigger words and symbols being frequently used, combined with other fake stuff that people were saying would immediately happen and didn't turned me off immediately.

I was more surprised that I hadn't even seen the Wikileaks tweet than anything. It's like 6 months old now I think.

EricKaliberhall ago

I did watch it for a while in the beginning but the NLP combined with the MK Ultra trigger words and symbols being frequently used, combined with other fake stuff that people were saying would immediately happen and didn't turned me off immediately.

Why do you use alts referencing Q if what you say is true? You are so full of shit you fucking shill cunt.

EffYouJohnPodesta ago

I'm shocked after two weeks you are still upset that I'm here, I've been here for two years. Get over it, you have like 75% of the people here following Q and approximately two dissenters. Too bad Wikileaks disagrees with you though. That must be tough.

EricKaliberhall ago

Too bad Wikileaks disagrees with you though. That must be tough.

The same Wikileaks that doxxed ICE employees. Yeah, very tough.

You are a shill and I will call you out on it. Get over it... Cunt.

EffYouJohnPodesta ago

So I went and looked at the Wikileaks ICE database you're referring to. It did not bother me but maybe I'm a retard. Personally I think if Wikileaks lets people know who cops are that is fine. Are ICE agents legally allowed to hide who they are? Are you against ICwatch also? Are the identities of ICE employees supposed to be legally hidden from public information because I don't see actual doxxing, just outing their LinkedIns. It might be uncomfortable for them but if it's not a legal requirement for them to hide their status then what is the problem?

EffYouJohnPodesta ago

So you're saying Wikileaks is bullshit now?

EricKaliberhall ago

I'm saying you are full of bullshit.

EffYouJohnPodesta ago

OK, thanks for letting me know you think that. Have a nice day.