Let me start off by saying that I'm not going to come out of the gate here and be like "Oh My God, look it's a pedo symbol, the pedophiles control Dollar Tree, they're taking over the world, yada yada yada...". I never want to be like that. This is going to be more of a question than an rushing-out-of-the-gate statement.
Knowing what we know about the pedophile code symbols, (there's a link on that page to download the file which shows the heart within another heart) -
When I saw this, I got irked. I don't usually get shook, but the words underneath got to me - "Baby Love".
Is it all just because of the subject matter considering the rest of the back wall was filled with gift bags for little children's parties or am I right for being irked?
view the rest of the comments →
sodePllAlliK ago
I think more is needed than just a picture of a logo somewhere. BTW I'm not discounting the image at all. If someone were to dig up some pedo-related dirt on top people in DT, or those connected to that logo, then that would be what I consider "smoke," which is all most of us are capable of finding. The "Big inside the little" symbolism seems to be the most prevalent and common theme in logos related to these parasites.
YogSoggoth ago
You can Wiki it. Brothers Donald and Richard Kaufman originally opened a wholesale candy store, Kaufman Brothers, in Pittsfield, Massachusetts in 1922. During the 1940s, the brothers acquired a wholesale toy company from a candy client who owed them money for outstanding debts. KB toys bought by Toys are us, Bain capitol, long history of trying to be next to children. Look at the current status of Toys are us.
sodePllAlliK ago
But where are the links to pedophilia?
YogSoggoth ago
First of all, I did not make a post, but a comment. Now that you are under my radar, the obvious connections are correlated by financial means to have access to kids and pass the debt to the taxpayer. You would have to have some understanding of the financial world to comprehend what I am talking about.
sodePllAlliK ago
Haha "first of all" wtf are you talking about with the "post/comment" shit? 2nd, I'm not "under" anything or anyone. If anything, I'm over your radar haha. Fucking weirdo. Lastly, don't bother backing any of your claims with sources or references, because I'm clearly too stupid to have any comprehension of "the financial world." Actually, I don't even know what those words mean.
YogSoggoth ago
Wiki has truth and fiction, true. You can easily find the same information from other sources to back it up though. I assume you are behind a computer device. One of my strong points is following the money and families behind companies and corporations. If you do not understand the rules (post/comment), then go to the right of the opening page. You attacking someone who makes a harmless post is weird, and your use of unnecessary profanity to defend yourself is very suspect. On, under, ... certainly not above.