I did a bit more testing. It seems to be a limitation of Google's database.
You get the same 2007 cut off for searches such as "Katy Perry" or "Kim Kardashian" as well.
I don't think most people are aware that google images only goes back to 2008. Seems noteworthy.
Specifically, under tools, I left start range blank and set end range to 2007. I get 0 results for VPN via Atlanta & CA. I also tried it under private browsing with same results.
You get plenty of results for before 2007?
I was thinking it might be regional censorship, but I'm not so sure after I tested CA too.
idk what this is, except most likely scrubbing of some kind.
I'm on my phone so I didn't do date ranges. Instead I put his name and 2007 and saw some older photos of him, some with Kimberly, etc. Then I changed the year to 2009 just to see and got a lot of photos. More recent stuff too, not just 2009. I thought you were looking at how he physically changed, but that's weird if the search is doing that to you.
Gavin Newsom rings a lot of bells. Lieutenant Governor of CA now running for Gov. Married to and divorced from Kim Guilfoyle. Former mayor of San Francisco and connected to J Paul Getty and Nancy Pelosi and now Alefantis? More digging needs to be done on Gavin Newsom and his possible connection to pedophilia and human trafficking. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavin_Newsom
Don't worry about getting into the weeds on this sub. We want to discover and document anything little that could be significant. Maybe the number has meaning, and maybe it doesn't. Someone here might know.
Dsonophorus ago
go to google images and search for all Gavin Newsom images before 2008 then set the range to before 2007
What did you notice?
Shizy ago
I noticed he looks more thin and frail. Did he start smoking crack?
Dsonophorus ago
I get essentially endless results for before 2008 I get 0 search results for before 2007
This may be info on google censoring if your results are different. I ran the query on Firefox browser with VPN to Atlanta.
Shizy ago
Weird? Why is that you think?
Dsonophorus ago
I did a bit more testing. It seems to be a limitation of Google's database. You get the same 2007 cut off for searches such as "Katy Perry" or "Kim Kardashian" as well.
I don't think most people are aware that google images only goes back to 2008. Seems noteworthy.
Shizy ago
Hmmmm, that's really odd!
Dsonophorus ago
Specifically, under tools, I left start range blank and set end range to 2007. I get 0 results for VPN via Atlanta & CA. I also tried it under private browsing with same results.
You get plenty of results for before 2007? I was thinking it might be regional censorship, but I'm not so sure after I tested CA too.
idk what this is, except most likely scrubbing of some kind.
Shizy ago
I'm on my phone so I didn't do date ranges. Instead I put his name and 2007 and saw some older photos of him, some with Kimberly, etc. Then I changed the year to 2009 just to see and got a lot of photos. More recent stuff too, not just 2009. I thought you were looking at how he physically changed, but that's weird if the search is doing that to you.
shewhomustbeobeyed ago
ballotpedia - https://archive.is/1kbjA
wiki - https://archive.is/rauph
lamplight ago
Gavin Newsom rings a lot of bells. Lieutenant Governor of CA now running for Gov. Married to and divorced from Kim Guilfoyle. Former mayor of San Francisco and connected to J Paul Getty and Nancy Pelosi and now Alefantis? More digging needs to be done on Gavin Newsom and his possible connection to pedophilia and human trafficking. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavin_Newsom
MichaelClayton ago
He personally legalized gay marriage in SF, the first place in US history to do so.
SamsonOption ago
https://media.giphy.com/media/4HcQrwwy23Vc9otP72/giphy.gif
Curiouser and Curiouser...
Factfinder2 ago
Also, $654 is a strange amount.
IShallNotFear ago
Yes, I wonder if it has any meaning to it? That might be getting too far into the weeds though.
Factfinder2 ago
Don't worry about getting into the weeds on this sub. We want to discover and document anything little that could be significant. Maybe the number has meaning, and maybe it doesn't. Someone here might know.
SamsonOption ago
https://media.giphy.com/media/4HcQrwwy23Vc9otP72/giphy.gif
someone might
Diggernicks ago
I'm not worried
http://imgur.com/bBD5VyQ.jpg