Wow, add on that pope Francis has been asked to resign...Was Nostradamus right in his predictions? Will this be the last pope?

I am very sorry @rickman, but I will have to remove the post, since the headline is blatantly false, and also your two sources have disinfo. (When both the body of the post and the headline would need to be edited, we remove the post, since titles cannot be edited here on Voat.)

1) Wikileaks doesn't / didn't say 'Obama, Clinton & Soros Overthrew Pope Benedict'.

2) In fact, there never was a Wikileaks report about this topic like your first source claims (' In a new report from Wikileaks, it’s now alleged that these three oversaw a coup to remove Pope Benedict.')

3) There is only an e-mail exchange between Sandy Newman and John Podesta (please see below), published by Wikileaks when the other hacked emails were published in 2016.

Sandy Newman suggests there should be a 'Catholic Spring', but John Podesta replies

'We created Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good to organize for a moment like this. But I think it lacks the leadership to do so now. Likewise Catholics United. Like most Spring movements, I think this one will have to be bottom up.'

So, in fact, he argues against the proposal to instigate a 'Catholic Spring' from above.

While I personally believe that an alliance of globalists within and outside the Church forced Pope Benedict to resign, these two particular emails published by Wikileaks don't confirm this, but, quite to the contrary, show that Podesta wasn't enthusiastic about the proposal to iniatiate a 'Catholic Spring', and obviously didn't want the two organizations mentioned to get involved.

(Whether this may have changed later is another matter, but the Wikileaks emails don't confirm your claim.)

Removing per Rules 2 and 3.

Thank you.

=======================================

Sandy Newman sandynewman@gmail.com wrote:

Hi, John, This whole controversy with the bishops opposing contraceptive coverage even though 98% of Catholic women (and their conjugal partners) have used contraception has me thinking . . . There needs to be a Catholic Spring, in which Catholics themselves demand the end of a middle ages dictatorship and the beginning of a little democracy and respect for gender equality in the Catholic church. Is contraceptive coverage an issue around which that could happen.

The Bishops will undoubtedly continue the fight. Does the Catholic Hospital Association support of the Administration's new policy, together with "the 98%" create an opportunity? Of course, this idea may just reveal my total lack of understanding of the Catholic church, the economic power it can bring to bear against nuns and priests who count on it for their maintenance, etc. Even if the idea isn't crazy, I don't qualify to be involved and I have not thought at all about how one would "plant the seeds of the revolution," or who would plant them. Just wondering . . . Hoping you're well, and getting to focus your time in the ways you want. Sandy

Sandy Newman, President Voices for Progress

From: John Podesta To: Sandy Newman Cc: Tara McGuinness Subject: Re: opening for a Catholic Spring? just musing . . .

Sent: Feb 11, 2012 8:45 AM We created Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good to organize for a moment like this. But I think it lacks the leadership to do so now. Likewise Catholics United. Like most Spring movements, I think this one will have to be bottom up.

*(my emphasis)

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/57579

@Vindicator

Every Pope is a pedophile or covers for pedophiles.

Catholicism's multi-theistic ideology should have been a warning sign...

Well if he was actually a Nazi or believed their ideas, he would have been one of the globalists most powerful enemies. It would make sense that they'd want him replaced with a fellow pederast.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6293

Re: opening for a Catholic Spring? just musing . . .

"plant the seeds of the revolution" ?

Doesn't sound like just musing to me.

I've wondered about this for a while... since it's obvious that the actual pope was ousted, and some agent has taken his place, what does this mean for Catholicism? I don't know much about religiousity, but my incredibly basic understanding is that the difference between Catholic Christians & the rest of Christians is that Catholics follow the pope. Well, there is no pope. Or, the pope isn't recognized by the church. Or, the pope is an agent against the church?

Where does that leave Catholicism? Is it no longer viable?

I don't know. I'm curious what Catholics, or former Catholics, think about this.

Catholicism was always a demonic belief system. The true Jesus tells people to get away from catholicism.

Uh Pope Benedict also had a paedo issue

“Podesta, a longtime Clinton adviser/confidante and hand-picked top activist for left-wing funder George Soros, revealed in a 2011 e-mail that he and other activists were working to effect a “Catholic Spring” revolution within the Catholic Church, an obvious reference to the disastrous “Arab Spring” coups organized that same year by the Obama-Clinton-Soros team that destabilized the Middle East and brought radical Islamist regimes and terrorist groups to power in the region.The Podesta e-mail is a response to another Soros-funded radical — Sandy Newman, founder of the “progressive” Voices for Progress. Newman had written to Podesta seeking advice on the best way to “plant the seeds of the revolution” in the Catholic Church, which he described as a “middle ages [sic] dictatorship.”

The Vatican has been dirty since its inception. It's never been a champion of Christianity. Becoming a religion was simply a strategy for controlling the truth that was spoken by other religious orders. It also helped wage war and maraude and loot, and also slaughter orders that held onto Christ's words.